Cargando…

APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)

Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Culley, Theresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Botanical Society of America 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055
_version_ 1782327152064069632
author Culley, Theresa M.
author_facet Culley, Theresa M.
author_sort Culley, Theresa M.
collection PubMed
description Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. The most frequent form of self-plagiarism in APPS submissions is text recycling, which depending on the extent and location of copied text, has consequences ranging from authors being required to rewrite duplicated text or add citations, to automatic rejection of a manuscript without review. Ultimately, avoidance of self-plagiarism will result in original articles that improve upon, and do not simply replicate, the existing literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4103480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Botanical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41034802014-09-08 APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) Culley, Theresa M. Appl Plant Sci Editorial Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. The most frequent form of self-plagiarism in APPS submissions is text recycling, which depending on the extent and location of copied text, has consequences ranging from authors being required to rewrite duplicated text or add citations, to automatic rejection of a manuscript without review. Ultimately, avoidance of self-plagiarism will result in original articles that improve upon, and do not simply replicate, the existing literature. Botanical Society of America 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4103480/ /pubmed/25202643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055 Text en © 2014 Culley. Published by the Botanical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA).
spellingShingle Editorial
Culley, Theresa M.
APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title_full APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title_fullStr APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title_full_unstemmed APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title_short APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
title_sort apps’s stance on self-plagiarism: just say no(1)
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202643
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055
work_keys_str_mv AT culleytheresam appssstanceonselfplagiarismjustsayno1