Cargando…
APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1)
Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. Th...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Botanical Society of America
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055 |
_version_ | 1782327152064069632 |
---|---|
author | Culley, Theresa M. |
author_facet | Culley, Theresa M. |
author_sort | Culley, Theresa M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. The most frequent form of self-plagiarism in APPS submissions is text recycling, which depending on the extent and location of copied text, has consequences ranging from authors being required to rewrite duplicated text or add citations, to automatic rejection of a manuscript without review. Ultimately, avoidance of self-plagiarism will result in original articles that improve upon, and do not simply replicate, the existing literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4103480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Botanical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41034802014-09-08 APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) Culley, Theresa M. Appl Plant Sci Editorial Should authors be able to reuse the same text in multiple papers without citing the earlier source? Known as self-plagiarism, this practice is strongly discouraged in Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) because it violates professional standards, is potentially deceptive, and lacks originality. The most frequent form of self-plagiarism in APPS submissions is text recycling, which depending on the extent and location of copied text, has consequences ranging from authors being required to rewrite duplicated text or add citations, to automatic rejection of a manuscript without review. Ultimately, avoidance of self-plagiarism will result in original articles that improve upon, and do not simply replicate, the existing literature. Botanical Society of America 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4103480/ /pubmed/25202643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055 Text en © 2014 Culley. Published by the Botanical Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA). |
spellingShingle | Editorial Culley, Theresa M. APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title | APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title_full | APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title_fullStr | APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title_full_unstemmed | APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title_short | APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no(1) |
title_sort | apps’s stance on self-plagiarism: just say no(1) |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202643 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT culleytheresam appssstanceonselfplagiarismjustsayno1 |