Cargando…
A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25036181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418 |
_version_ | 1782327187676856320 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tien-Hsing Wo, Hung-Ta Chang, Po-Cheng Wang, Chun-Chieh Wen, Ming-Shien Chou, Chung-Chuan |
author_facet | Chen, Tien-Hsing Wo, Hung-Ta Chang, Po-Cheng Wang, Chun-Chieh Wen, Ming-Shien Chou, Chung-Chuan |
author_sort | Chen, Tien-Hsing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESRD who have received and not received an ICD. A search was conducted on January 31, 2013 of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected for inclusion based on the following criteria. 1) Randomized controlled trial. 2) ESRD patients with heart failure. 3) Device therapy (ICD, CRT-defibrillator [CRT-D]) used to treat heart failure. 4) Primary outcome is survival analysis. 5) Retrospective study if survival analysis was performed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was 2-year survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and a χ(2)-based test of homogeneity was performed. Three studies were included in the analysis. The combined OR for OS was 2.245 (95% CI 1.871 to 2.685, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher OS than those without an ICD. The combined OR for 2-year survival was 2.312 (95% CI 1.921 to 2.784, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher 2-year survival rate than those without an ICD. The use of ICD in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in the OS and the 2-year survival rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4103758 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41037582014-07-21 A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) Chen, Tien-Hsing Wo, Hung-Ta Chang, Po-Cheng Wang, Chun-Chieh Wen, Ming-Shien Chou, Chung-Chuan PLoS One Research Article Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESRD who have received and not received an ICD. A search was conducted on January 31, 2013 of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected for inclusion based on the following criteria. 1) Randomized controlled trial. 2) ESRD patients with heart failure. 3) Device therapy (ICD, CRT-defibrillator [CRT-D]) used to treat heart failure. 4) Primary outcome is survival analysis. 5) Retrospective study if survival analysis was performed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was 2-year survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and a χ(2)-based test of homogeneity was performed. Three studies were included in the analysis. The combined OR for OS was 2.245 (95% CI 1.871 to 2.685, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher OS than those without an ICD. The combined OR for 2-year survival was 2.312 (95% CI 1.921 to 2.784, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher 2-year survival rate than those without an ICD. The use of ICD in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in the OS and the 2-year survival rate. Public Library of Science 2014-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4103758/ /pubmed/25036181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418 Text en © 2014 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Tien-Hsing Wo, Hung-Ta Chang, Po-Cheng Wang, Chun-Chieh Wen, Ming-Shien Chou, Chung-Chuan A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title | A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title_full | A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title_fullStr | A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title_full_unstemmed | A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title_short | A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) |
title_sort | meta-analysis of mortality in end-stage renal disease patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (icds) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103758/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25036181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentienhsing ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wohungta ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT changpocheng ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wangchunchieh ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wenmingshien ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT chouchungchuan ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT chentienhsing metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wohungta metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT changpocheng metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wangchunchieh metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT wenmingshien metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds AT chouchungchuan metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds |