Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)

Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tien-Hsing, Wo, Hung-Ta, Chang, Po-Cheng, Wang, Chun-Chieh, Wen, Ming-Shien, Chou, Chung-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25036181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418
_version_ 1782327187676856320
author Chen, Tien-Hsing
Wo, Hung-Ta
Chang, Po-Cheng
Wang, Chun-Chieh
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chou, Chung-Chuan
author_facet Chen, Tien-Hsing
Wo, Hung-Ta
Chang, Po-Cheng
Wang, Chun-Chieh
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chou, Chung-Chuan
author_sort Chen, Tien-Hsing
collection PubMed
description Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESRD who have received and not received an ICD. A search was conducted on January 31, 2013 of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected for inclusion based on the following criteria. 1) Randomized controlled trial. 2) ESRD patients with heart failure. 3) Device therapy (ICD, CRT-defibrillator [CRT-D]) used to treat heart failure. 4) Primary outcome is survival analysis. 5) Retrospective study if survival analysis was performed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was 2-year survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and a χ(2)-based test of homogeneity was performed. Three studies were included in the analysis. The combined OR for OS was 2.245 (95% CI 1.871 to 2.685, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher OS than those without an ICD. The combined OR for 2-year survival was 2.312 (95% CI 1.921 to 2.784, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher 2-year survival rate than those without an ICD. The use of ICD in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in the OS and the 2-year survival rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4103758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41037582014-07-21 A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) Chen, Tien-Hsing Wo, Hung-Ta Chang, Po-Cheng Wang, Chun-Chieh Wen, Ming-Shien Chou, Chung-Chuan PLoS One Research Article Data on the effectiveness of implantable implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with respect to reducing mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are lacking. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the mortality of patients with ESRD who have received and not received an ICD. A search was conducted on January 31, 2013 of Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected for inclusion based on the following criteria. 1) Randomized controlled trial. 2) ESRD patients with heart failure. 3) Device therapy (ICD, CRT-defibrillator [CRT-D]) used to treat heart failure. 4) Primary outcome is survival analysis. 5) Retrospective study if survival analysis was performed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was 2-year survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and a χ(2)-based test of homogeneity was performed. Three studies were included in the analysis. The combined OR for OS was 2.245 (95% CI 1.871 to 2.685, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher OS than those without an ICD. The combined OR for 2-year survival was 2.312 (95% CI 1.921 to 2.784, P<0.001), indicating that patients with an ICD had a significantly higher 2-year survival rate than those without an ICD. The use of ICD in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in the OS and the 2-year survival rate. Public Library of Science 2014-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4103758/ /pubmed/25036181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418 Text en © 2014 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Tien-Hsing
Wo, Hung-Ta
Chang, Po-Cheng
Wang, Chun-Chieh
Wen, Ming-Shien
Chou, Chung-Chuan
A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Receiving Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs)
title_sort meta-analysis of mortality in end-stage renal disease patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (icds)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25036181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099418
work_keys_str_mv AT chentienhsing ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wohungta ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT changpocheng ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wangchunchieh ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wenmingshien ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT chouchungchuan ametaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT chentienhsing metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wohungta metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT changpocheng metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wangchunchieh metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT wenmingshien metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds
AT chouchungchuan metaanalysisofmortalityinendstagerenaldiseasepatientsreceivingimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorsicds