Cargando…

Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common complaint in adults. Lactitol is an osmotic disaccharide laxative that increases fecal volume and stimulates peristalsis. In this paper, we present the first meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of lactitol for adult constipation. METHODS: We searched MEDL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Larry E, Tennilä, Julia, Ouwehand, Arthur C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050074
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58952
_version_ 1782327215407497216
author Miller, Larry E
Tennilä, Julia
Ouwehand, Arthur C
author_facet Miller, Larry E
Tennilä, Julia
Ouwehand, Arthur C
author_sort Miller, Larry E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common complaint in adults. Lactitol is an osmotic disaccharide laxative that increases fecal volume and stimulates peristalsis. In this paper, we present the first meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of lactitol for adult constipation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE(®) and Embase, with no date or language restrictions, for studies of lactitol supplementation on adult constipation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on pre- to posttreatment changes in stool frequency and consistency with lactitol among all studies, as well as a comparison of efficacy and tolerance outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lactitol versus lactulose. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies representing 663 distinct patients were included in the final analysis, including five single-arm studies, four RCTs comparing lactitol with lactulose, one RCT comparing lactitol with placebo, and one nonrandomized controlled trial comparing lactitol with stimulant laxatives. Weekly stool frequency was significantly increased with lactitol compared with baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.56, P<0.001). Stool consistency also improved over the supplementation period with lactitol (SMD: 1.04, P<0.001). Approximately one-third of patients experienced an adverse event; however, symptoms were generally mild and rarely (5%) resulted in study withdrawal. In RCTs of lactitol versus lactulose, lactitol was slightly more effective than lactulose in increasing weekly stool frequency (SMD: 0.19, P=0.06). No statistically significant differences between lactitol and lactulose were identified in any other efficacy or tolerance outcome. Lactitol demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerance in individual studies when compared to stimulant laxatives and placebo. CONCLUSION: Lactitol supplementation is well tolerated and improves symptoms of adult constipation. The efficacy and tolerance of lactitol and lactulose are similar, with a trend for more frequent stools with lactitol. Limited evidence suggests lactitol is superior to stimulant laxatives and placebo for relieving constipation symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4103919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41039192014-07-21 Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Miller, Larry E Tennilä, Julia Ouwehand, Arthur C Clin Exp Gastroenterol Review BACKGROUND: Constipation is a common complaint in adults. Lactitol is an osmotic disaccharide laxative that increases fecal volume and stimulates peristalsis. In this paper, we present the first meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerance of lactitol for adult constipation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE(®) and Embase, with no date or language restrictions, for studies of lactitol supplementation on adult constipation. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on pre- to posttreatment changes in stool frequency and consistency with lactitol among all studies, as well as a comparison of efficacy and tolerance outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lactitol versus lactulose. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies representing 663 distinct patients were included in the final analysis, including five single-arm studies, four RCTs comparing lactitol with lactulose, one RCT comparing lactitol with placebo, and one nonrandomized controlled trial comparing lactitol with stimulant laxatives. Weekly stool frequency was significantly increased with lactitol compared with baseline (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.56, P<0.001). Stool consistency also improved over the supplementation period with lactitol (SMD: 1.04, P<0.001). Approximately one-third of patients experienced an adverse event; however, symptoms were generally mild and rarely (5%) resulted in study withdrawal. In RCTs of lactitol versus lactulose, lactitol was slightly more effective than lactulose in increasing weekly stool frequency (SMD: 0.19, P=0.06). No statistically significant differences between lactitol and lactulose were identified in any other efficacy or tolerance outcome. Lactitol demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerance in individual studies when compared to stimulant laxatives and placebo. CONCLUSION: Lactitol supplementation is well tolerated and improves symptoms of adult constipation. The efficacy and tolerance of lactitol and lactulose are similar, with a trend for more frequent stools with lactitol. Limited evidence suggests lactitol is superior to stimulant laxatives and placebo for relieving constipation symptoms. Dove Medical Press 2014-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4103919/ /pubmed/25050074 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58952 Text en © 2014 Miller et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed
spellingShingle Review
Miller, Larry E
Tennilä, Julia
Ouwehand, Arthur C
Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and tolerance of lactitol supplementation for adult constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050074
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEG.S58952
work_keys_str_mv AT millerlarrye efficacyandtoleranceoflactitolsupplementationforadultconstipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tennilajulia efficacyandtoleranceoflactitolsupplementationforadultconstipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ouwehandarthurc efficacyandtoleranceoflactitolsupplementationforadultconstipationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis