Cargando…

Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical healing rates, implant failure, implant removal, and the need for surgical revision with regards to plate type in midshaft clavicle fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates utilizing modern plating techniques. METHODS: This retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilde, Alex K, Jones, Clifford B, Sietsema, Debra L, Hoffmann, Martin F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24993508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0055-x
_version_ 1782327263825494016
author Gilde, Alex K
Jones, Clifford B
Sietsema, Debra L
Hoffmann, Martin F
author_facet Gilde, Alex K
Jones, Clifford B
Sietsema, Debra L
Hoffmann, Martin F
author_sort Gilde, Alex K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical healing rates, implant failure, implant removal, and the need for surgical revision with regards to plate type in midshaft clavicle fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates utilizing modern plating techniques. METHODS: This retrospective exploratory cohort review took place at a level I teaching trauma center and a single large private practice office. A total of 155 skeletally mature individuals with 156 midshaft clavicle fractures between March 2002 and March 2012 were included in the final results. Fractures were identified by mechanism of injury and classified based on OTA/AO criteria. All fractures were fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates. Primary outcome measurements included implant failure, malunion, nonunion, and implant removal. Secondary outcome measurements included pain with the visual analog scale and range of motion. Statistically significant testing was set at 0.05, and testing was performed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskall-Wallis. RESULTS: Implant failure occurred more often in reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates (p = 0.029). Malunions and nonunions occurred more often in fractures fixed with reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates, but it was not statistically significant. Implant removal attributed to irritation or implant prominence was observed in 14 patients. Statistically significant levels of pain were seen in patients requiring implant removal (p = 0.001) but were not associated with the plate type. CONCLUSIONS: Anteroinferior clavicular fracture fixation with 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates results in excellent healing rates with low removal rates in accordance with the published literature. Given higher rates of failure, 2.7-mm reconstruction plates should be discouraged in comparison to stiffer and more reliable 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4104465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41044652014-07-22 Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study Gilde, Alex K Jones, Clifford B Sietsema, Debra L Hoffmann, Martin F J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical healing rates, implant failure, implant removal, and the need for surgical revision with regards to plate type in midshaft clavicle fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates utilizing modern plating techniques. METHODS: This retrospective exploratory cohort review took place at a level I teaching trauma center and a single large private practice office. A total of 155 skeletally mature individuals with 156 midshaft clavicle fractures between March 2002 and March 2012 were included in the final results. Fractures were identified by mechanism of injury and classified based on OTA/AO criteria. All fractures were fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates. Primary outcome measurements included implant failure, malunion, nonunion, and implant removal. Secondary outcome measurements included pain with the visual analog scale and range of motion. Statistically significant testing was set at 0.05, and testing was performed using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, Mann–Whitney U, and Kruskall-Wallis. RESULTS: Implant failure occurred more often in reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates (p = 0.029). Malunions and nonunions occurred more often in fractures fixed with reconstruction plates as compared to dynamic compression plates, but it was not statistically significant. Implant removal attributed to irritation or implant prominence was observed in 14 patients. Statistically significant levels of pain were seen in patients requiring implant removal (p = 0.001) but were not associated with the plate type. CONCLUSIONS: Anteroinferior clavicular fracture fixation with 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates results in excellent healing rates with low removal rates in accordance with the published literature. Given higher rates of failure, 2.7-mm reconstruction plates should be discouraged in comparison to stiffer and more reliable 2.7-mm dynamic compression plates. BioMed Central 2014-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4104465/ /pubmed/24993508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0055-x Text en Copyright © 2014 Gilde et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gilde, Alex K
Jones, Clifford B
Sietsema, Debra L
Hoffmann, Martin F
Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title_full Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title_short Does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? A retrospective cohort study
title_sort does plate type influence the clinical outcomes and implant removal in midclavicular fractures fixed with 2.7-mm anteroinferior plates? a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24993508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0055-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gildealexk doesplatetypeinfluencetheclinicaloutcomesandimplantremovalinmidclavicularfracturesfixedwith27mmanteroinferiorplatesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jonescliffordb doesplatetypeinfluencetheclinicaloutcomesandimplantremovalinmidclavicularfracturesfixedwith27mmanteroinferiorplatesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sietsemadebral doesplatetypeinfluencetheclinicaloutcomesandimplantremovalinmidclavicularfracturesfixedwith27mmanteroinferiorplatesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hoffmannmartinf doesplatetypeinfluencetheclinicaloutcomesandimplantremovalinmidclavicularfracturesfixedwith27mmanteroinferiorplatesaretrospectivecohortstudy