Cargando…

On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care

BACKGROUND: For most women, participation in decision-making during maternity care has a positive impact on their childbirth experiences. Shared decision-making (SDM) is widely advocated as a way to support people in their healthcare choices. The aim of this study was to identify quality criteria an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J, Korstjens, Irene, de Jonge, Ank, de Vries, Raymond, Lagro-Janssen, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25008286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-223
_version_ 1782327284956397568
author Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J
Korstjens, Irene
de Jonge, Ank
de Vries, Raymond
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine
author_facet Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J
Korstjens, Irene
de Jonge, Ank
de Vries, Raymond
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine
author_sort Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For most women, participation in decision-making during maternity care has a positive impact on their childbirth experiences. Shared decision-making (SDM) is widely advocated as a way to support people in their healthcare choices. The aim of this study was to identify quality criteria and professional competencies for applying shared decision-making in maternity care. We focused on decision-making in everyday maternity care practice for healthy women. METHODS: An international three-round web-based Delphi study was conducted. The Delphi panel included international experts in SDM and in maternity care: mostly midwives, and additionally obstetricians, educators, researchers, policy makers and representatives of care users. Round 1 contained open-ended questions to explore relevant ingredients for SDM in maternity care and to identify the competencies needed for this. In rounds 2 and 3, experts rated statements on quality criteria and competencies on a 1 to 7 Likert-scale. A priori, positive consensus was defined as 70% or more of the experts scoring ≥6 (70% panel agreement). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 45 quality criteria statements and 4 competency statements. SDM in maternity care is a dynamic process that starts in antenatal care and ends after birth. Experts agreed that the regular visits during pregnancy offer opportunities to build a relationship, anticipate situations and revisit complex decisions. Professionals need to prepare women antenatally for unexpected, urgent decisions in birth and revisit these decisions postnatally. Open and respectful communication between women and care professionals is essential; information needs to be accurate, evidence-based and understandable to women. Experts were divided about the contribution of professional advice in shared decision-making and about the partner’s role. CONCLUSIONS: SDM in maternity care is a dynamic process that takes into consideration women’s individual needs and the context of the pregnancy or birth. The identified ingredients for good quality SDM will help practitioners to apply SDM in practice and educators to prepare (future) professionals for SDM, contributing to women’s positive birth experience and satisfaction with care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4104734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41047342014-07-22 On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J Korstjens, Irene de Jonge, Ank de Vries, Raymond Lagro-Janssen, Antoine BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: For most women, participation in decision-making during maternity care has a positive impact on their childbirth experiences. Shared decision-making (SDM) is widely advocated as a way to support people in their healthcare choices. The aim of this study was to identify quality criteria and professional competencies for applying shared decision-making in maternity care. We focused on decision-making in everyday maternity care practice for healthy women. METHODS: An international three-round web-based Delphi study was conducted. The Delphi panel included international experts in SDM and in maternity care: mostly midwives, and additionally obstetricians, educators, researchers, policy makers and representatives of care users. Round 1 contained open-ended questions to explore relevant ingredients for SDM in maternity care and to identify the competencies needed for this. In rounds 2 and 3, experts rated statements on quality criteria and competencies on a 1 to 7 Likert-scale. A priori, positive consensus was defined as 70% or more of the experts scoring ≥6 (70% panel agreement). RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 45 quality criteria statements and 4 competency statements. SDM in maternity care is a dynamic process that starts in antenatal care and ends after birth. Experts agreed that the regular visits during pregnancy offer opportunities to build a relationship, anticipate situations and revisit complex decisions. Professionals need to prepare women antenatally for unexpected, urgent decisions in birth and revisit these decisions postnatally. Open and respectful communication between women and care professionals is essential; information needs to be accurate, evidence-based and understandable to women. Experts were divided about the contribution of professional advice in shared decision-making and about the partner’s role. CONCLUSIONS: SDM in maternity care is a dynamic process that takes into consideration women’s individual needs and the context of the pregnancy or birth. The identified ingredients for good quality SDM will help practitioners to apply SDM in practice and educators to prepare (future) professionals for SDM, contributing to women’s positive birth experience and satisfaction with care. BioMed Central 2014-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4104734/ /pubmed/25008286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-223 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nieuwenhuijze et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J
Korstjens, Irene
de Jonge, Ank
de Vries, Raymond
Lagro-Janssen, Antoine
On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title_full On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title_fullStr On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title_full_unstemmed On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title_short On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
title_sort on speaking terms: a delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4104734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25008286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-223
work_keys_str_mv AT nieuwenhuijzemariannej onspeakingtermsadelphistudyonshareddecisionmakinginmaternitycare
AT korstjensirene onspeakingtermsadelphistudyonshareddecisionmakinginmaternitycare
AT dejongeank onspeakingtermsadelphistudyonshareddecisionmakinginmaternitycare
AT devriesraymond onspeakingtermsadelphistudyonshareddecisionmakinginmaternitycare
AT lagrojanssenantoine onspeakingtermsadelphistudyonshareddecisionmakinginmaternitycare