Cargando…
Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis and symptomatic varus malalignment. We hypothesized that different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for the various wedge sizes in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-230 |
_version_ | 1782327336642805760 |
---|---|
author | Golovakhа, Мaxim L Orljanski, Weniamin Benedetto, Karl-Peter Panchenko, Sergey Büchler, Philippe Henle, Philipp Aghayev, Emin |
author_facet | Golovakhа, Мaxim L Orljanski, Weniamin Benedetto, Karl-Peter Panchenko, Sergey Büchler, Philippe Henle, Philipp Aghayev, Emin |
author_sort | Golovakhа, Мaxim L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis and symptomatic varus malalignment. We hypothesized that different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for the various wedge sizes in a finite element (FE) analysis. METHODS: Four types of fixation were compared: 1) first and 2) second generation Puddu plates, and 3) TomoFix plate with and 4) without bone graft. Cortical and cancellous bone was modelled and five different opening wedge sizes were studied for each model. Outcome measures included: 1) stresses in bone, 2) relative displacement of the proximal and distal tibial fragments, 3) stresses in the plates, 4) stresses on the upper and lower screw surfaces in the screw channels. RESULTS: The highest load for all fixation types occurred in the plate axis. For the vast majority of the wedge sizes and fixation types the shear stress (von Mises stress) was dominating in the bone independent of fixation type. The relative displacements of the tibial fragments were low (in μm range). With an increasing wedge size this displacement tended to increase for both Puddu plates and the TomoFix plate with bone graft. For the TomoFix plate without bone graft a rather opposite trend was observed. For all fixation types the occurring stresses at the screw-bone contact areas pulled at the screws and exceeded the allowable threshold of 1.2 MPa for at least one screw surface. Of the six screw surfaces that were studied, the TomoFix plate with bone graft showed a stress excess of one out of twelve and without bone graft, five out of twelve. With the Puddu plates, an excess stress occurred in the majority of screw surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: The different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for different opening wedge sizes. Based on the computational simulations, none of the studied osteosynthesis fixation types warranted an intransigent full weight bearing per se. The highest fixation stability was observed for the TomoFix plates and the lowest for the first generation Puddu plate. These findings were revealed in theoretical models and need to be validated in controlled clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4105235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41052352014-07-22 Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis Golovakhа, Мaxim L Orljanski, Weniamin Benedetto, Karl-Peter Panchenko, Sergey Büchler, Philippe Henle, Philipp Aghayev, Emin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a well-established procedure for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis and symptomatic varus malalignment. We hypothesized that different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for the various wedge sizes in a finite element (FE) analysis. METHODS: Four types of fixation were compared: 1) first and 2) second generation Puddu plates, and 3) TomoFix plate with and 4) without bone graft. Cortical and cancellous bone was modelled and five different opening wedge sizes were studied for each model. Outcome measures included: 1) stresses in bone, 2) relative displacement of the proximal and distal tibial fragments, 3) stresses in the plates, 4) stresses on the upper and lower screw surfaces in the screw channels. RESULTS: The highest load for all fixation types occurred in the plate axis. For the vast majority of the wedge sizes and fixation types the shear stress (von Mises stress) was dominating in the bone independent of fixation type. The relative displacements of the tibial fragments were low (in μm range). With an increasing wedge size this displacement tended to increase for both Puddu plates and the TomoFix plate with bone graft. For the TomoFix plate without bone graft a rather opposite trend was observed. For all fixation types the occurring stresses at the screw-bone contact areas pulled at the screws and exceeded the allowable threshold of 1.2 MPa for at least one screw surface. Of the six screw surfaces that were studied, the TomoFix plate with bone graft showed a stress excess of one out of twelve and without bone graft, five out of twelve. With the Puddu plates, an excess stress occurred in the majority of screw surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: The different fixation devices generate different fixation stability profiles for different opening wedge sizes. Based on the computational simulations, none of the studied osteosynthesis fixation types warranted an intransigent full weight bearing per se. The highest fixation stability was observed for the TomoFix plates and the lowest for the first generation Puddu plate. These findings were revealed in theoretical models and need to be validated in controlled clinical settings. BioMed Central 2014-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4105235/ /pubmed/25012591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-230 Text en Copyright © 2014 Golovakha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Golovakhа, Мaxim L Orljanski, Weniamin Benedetto, Karl-Peter Panchenko, Sergey Büchler, Philippe Henle, Philipp Aghayev, Emin Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title | Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_full | Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_short | Comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
title_sort | comparison of theoretical fixation stability of three devices employed in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a finite element analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-230 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golovakhamaximl comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT orljanskiweniamin comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT benedettokarlpeter comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT panchenkosergey comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT buchlerphilippe comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT henlephilipp comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis AT aghayevemin comparisonoftheoreticalfixationstabilityofthreedevicesemployedinmedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomyafiniteelementanalysis |