Cargando…

Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that “silence”, i.e., not voicing safety concerns, is common among health care professionals (HCPs). Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and thus to prevent harm and also to improve a culture of teamwork and safety. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwappach, David LB, Gehring, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25017121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-303
_version_ 1782327381337309184
author Schwappach, David LB
Gehring, Katrin
author_facet Schwappach, David LB
Gehring, Katrin
author_sort Schwappach, David LB
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research suggests that “silence”, i.e., not voicing safety concerns, is common among health care professionals (HCPs). Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and thus to prevent harm and also to improve a culture of teamwork and safety. The aim of our study was to explore factors that affect oncology staff’s decision to voice safety concerns or to remain silent and to describe the trade-offs they make. METHODS: In a qualitative interview study with 32 doctors and nurses from 7 oncology units we investigated motivations and barriers to speaking up towards co-workers and supervisors. An inductive thematic content analysis framework was applied to the transcripts. Based on the individual experiences of participants, we conceptualize the choice to voice concerns and the trade-offs involved. RESULTS: Preventing patients from serious harm constitutes a strong motivation to speaking up but competes with anticipated negative outcomes. Decisions whether and how to voice concerns involved complex considerations and trade-offs. Many respondents reflected on whether the level of risk for a patient “justifies” the costs of speaking up. Various barriers for voicing concerns were reported, e.g., damaging relationships. Contextual factors, such as the presence of patients and co-workers in the alarming situation, affect the likelihood of anticipated negative outcomes. Speaking up to well-known co-workers was described as considerably easier whereas “not knowing the actor well” increases risks and potential costs of speaking up. CONCLUSIONS: While doctors and nurses felt strong obligation to prevent errors reaching individual patients, they were not engaged in voicing concerns beyond this immediacy. Our results offer in-depth insight into fears and conditions conducive of silence and voicing and can be used for educational interventions and leader reinforcement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41055192014-07-23 Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns Schwappach, David LB Gehring, Katrin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Research suggests that “silence”, i.e., not voicing safety concerns, is common among health care professionals (HCPs). Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and thus to prevent harm and also to improve a culture of teamwork and safety. The aim of our study was to explore factors that affect oncology staff’s decision to voice safety concerns or to remain silent and to describe the trade-offs they make. METHODS: In a qualitative interview study with 32 doctors and nurses from 7 oncology units we investigated motivations and barriers to speaking up towards co-workers and supervisors. An inductive thematic content analysis framework was applied to the transcripts. Based on the individual experiences of participants, we conceptualize the choice to voice concerns and the trade-offs involved. RESULTS: Preventing patients from serious harm constitutes a strong motivation to speaking up but competes with anticipated negative outcomes. Decisions whether and how to voice concerns involved complex considerations and trade-offs. Many respondents reflected on whether the level of risk for a patient “justifies” the costs of speaking up. Various barriers for voicing concerns were reported, e.g., damaging relationships. Contextual factors, such as the presence of patients and co-workers in the alarming situation, affect the likelihood of anticipated negative outcomes. Speaking up to well-known co-workers was described as considerably easier whereas “not knowing the actor well” increases risks and potential costs of speaking up. CONCLUSIONS: While doctors and nurses felt strong obligation to prevent errors reaching individual patients, they were not engaged in voicing concerns beyond this immediacy. Our results offer in-depth insight into fears and conditions conducive of silence and voicing and can be used for educational interventions and leader reinforcement. BioMed Central 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4105519/ /pubmed/25017121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-303 Text en Copyright © 2014 Schwappach and Gehring; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schwappach, David LB
Gehring, Katrin
Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title_full Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title_fullStr Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title_full_unstemmed Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title_short Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
title_sort trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25017121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-303
work_keys_str_mv AT schwappachdavidlb tradeoffsbetweenvoiceandsilenceaqualitativeexplorationofoncologystaffsdecisionstospeakupaboutsafetyconcerns
AT gehringkatrin tradeoffsbetweenvoiceandsilenceaqualitativeexplorationofoncologystaffsdecisionstospeakupaboutsafetyconcerns