Cargando…

Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of malaria vector populations provides information about disease transmission risk, as well as measures of the effectiveness of vector control. The Suna trap is introduced and evaluated with regard to its potential as a new, standardized, odour-baited tool for mosquito monitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiscox, Alexandra, Otieno, Bruno, Kibet, Anthony, Mweresa, Collins K, Omusula, Philemon, Geier, Martin, Rose, Andreas, Mukabana, Wolfgang R, Takken, Willem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24998771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-257
_version_ 1782327382976233472
author Hiscox, Alexandra
Otieno, Bruno
Kibet, Anthony
Mweresa, Collins K
Omusula, Philemon
Geier, Martin
Rose, Andreas
Mukabana, Wolfgang R
Takken, Willem
author_facet Hiscox, Alexandra
Otieno, Bruno
Kibet, Anthony
Mweresa, Collins K
Omusula, Philemon
Geier, Martin
Rose, Andreas
Mukabana, Wolfgang R
Takken, Willem
author_sort Hiscox, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monitoring of malaria vector populations provides information about disease transmission risk, as well as measures of the effectiveness of vector control. The Suna trap is introduced and evaluated with regard to its potential as a new, standardized, odour-baited tool for mosquito monitoring and control. METHODS: Dual-choice experiments with female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in a laboratory room and semi-field enclosure, were used to compare catch rates of odour-baited Suna traps and MM-X traps. The relative performance of the Suna trap, CDC light trap and MM-X trap as monitoring tools was assessed inside a human-occupied experimental hut in a semi-field enclosure. Use of the Suna trap as a tool to prevent mosquito house entry was also evaluated in the semi-field enclosure. The optimal hanging height of Suna traps was determined by placing traps at heights ranging from 15 to 105 cm above ground outside houses in western Kenya. RESULTS: In the laboratory the mean proportion of An. gambiae s.l. caught in the Suna trap was 3.2 times greater than the MM-X trap (P < 0.001), but the traps performed equally in semi-field conditions (P = 0.615). As a monitoring tool , the Suna trap outperformed an unlit CDC light trap (P < 0.001), but trap performance was equal when the CDC light trap was illuminated (P = 0.127). Suspending a Suna trap outside an experimental hut reduced entry rates by 32.8% (P < 0.001). Under field conditions, suspending the trap at 30 cm above ground resulted in the greatest catch sizes (mean 25.8 An. gambiae s.l. per trap night). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the Suna trap equals that of the CDC light trap and MM-X trap when used to sample An. gambiae inside a human-occupied house under semi-field conditions. The trap is effective in sampling mosquitoes outside houses in the field, and the use of a synthetic blend of attractants negates the requirement of a human bait. Hanging a Suna trap outside a house can reduce An. gambiae house entry and its use as a novel tool for reducing malaria transmission risk will be evaluated in peri-domestic settings in sub-Saharan Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41055272014-07-23 Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control Hiscox, Alexandra Otieno, Bruno Kibet, Anthony Mweresa, Collins K Omusula, Philemon Geier, Martin Rose, Andreas Mukabana, Wolfgang R Takken, Willem Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Monitoring of malaria vector populations provides information about disease transmission risk, as well as measures of the effectiveness of vector control. The Suna trap is introduced and evaluated with regard to its potential as a new, standardized, odour-baited tool for mosquito monitoring and control. METHODS: Dual-choice experiments with female Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in a laboratory room and semi-field enclosure, were used to compare catch rates of odour-baited Suna traps and MM-X traps. The relative performance of the Suna trap, CDC light trap and MM-X trap as monitoring tools was assessed inside a human-occupied experimental hut in a semi-field enclosure. Use of the Suna trap as a tool to prevent mosquito house entry was also evaluated in the semi-field enclosure. The optimal hanging height of Suna traps was determined by placing traps at heights ranging from 15 to 105 cm above ground outside houses in western Kenya. RESULTS: In the laboratory the mean proportion of An. gambiae s.l. caught in the Suna trap was 3.2 times greater than the MM-X trap (P < 0.001), but the traps performed equally in semi-field conditions (P = 0.615). As a monitoring tool , the Suna trap outperformed an unlit CDC light trap (P < 0.001), but trap performance was equal when the CDC light trap was illuminated (P = 0.127). Suspending a Suna trap outside an experimental hut reduced entry rates by 32.8% (P < 0.001). Under field conditions, suspending the trap at 30 cm above ground resulted in the greatest catch sizes (mean 25.8 An. gambiae s.l. per trap night). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of the Suna trap equals that of the CDC light trap and MM-X trap when used to sample An. gambiae inside a human-occupied house under semi-field conditions. The trap is effective in sampling mosquitoes outside houses in the field, and the use of a synthetic blend of attractants negates the requirement of a human bait. Hanging a Suna trap outside a house can reduce An. gambiae house entry and its use as a novel tool for reducing malaria transmission risk will be evaluated in peri-domestic settings in sub-Saharan Africa. BioMed Central 2014-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4105527/ /pubmed/24998771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-257 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hiscox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hiscox, Alexandra
Otieno, Bruno
Kibet, Anthony
Mweresa, Collins K
Omusula, Philemon
Geier, Martin
Rose, Andreas
Mukabana, Wolfgang R
Takken, Willem
Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title_full Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title_fullStr Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title_full_unstemmed Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title_short Development and optimization of the Suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
title_sort development and optimization of the suna trap as a tool for mosquito monitoring and control
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24998771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-257
work_keys_str_mv AT hiscoxalexandra developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT otienobruno developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT kibetanthony developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT mweresacollinsk developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT omusulaphilemon developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT geiermartin developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT roseandreas developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT mukabanawolfgangr developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol
AT takkenwillem developmentandoptimizationofthesunatrapasatoolformosquitomonitoringandcontrol