Cargando…

Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit

INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common reasons for emergency surgery within the abdominal cavity in Poland. AIM: To compare outcomes of surgical treatment of AA using both classical (OA) and laparoscopic methods (LA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 299 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pragacz, Krzysztof, Barczyński, Marcin, Kuchciński, Rafał, Zieliński, Andrzej, Nawrot, Ireneusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097692
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.42511
_version_ 1782327417666273280
author Pragacz, Krzysztof
Barczyński, Marcin
Kuchciński, Rafał
Zieliński, Andrzej
Nawrot, Ireneusz
author_facet Pragacz, Krzysztof
Barczyński, Marcin
Kuchciński, Rafał
Zieliński, Andrzej
Nawrot, Ireneusz
author_sort Pragacz, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common reasons for emergency surgery within the abdominal cavity in Poland. AIM: To compare outcomes of surgical treatment of AA using both classical (OA) and laparoscopic methods (LA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 299 patients (157 men and 142 women) operated on in 2008–2011 due to AA. The following comparisons between LA and OA were done: mean operative time, mean hospital stay after surgery, conversion rate, proportion of LA to OA in successive years. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 170 (56.9%) patients (74 men and 96 women), whereas OA was done in 89 (29.8%) patients (44 men and 45 women). In 13.4% of patients (24 men and 16 women) conversion from LA to OA was done. Mean operating time was 53.4 ±16.1 min (range: 25–100 min) for LA, and 55.4 ±20.2 min (range: 20–140 min) for OA; p = 0.64. Mean hospital stay after LA was 4.0 ±1.2 days (range: 2–9 days), while it was 6.0 ±4.2 days (range: 2–28 days) after OA; p < 0.001. Laparoscopic appendectomy was 24.1% of all appendectomies performed in the year 2008, 54.1% in the year 2009, and in consecutive years 71.7% in 2010 and 65.6% in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy method did not require longer surgery times and entailed shorter hospital stays as compared with OA. In our opinion, LA should be the preferred approach in surgical treatment of AA in adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41056822014-08-05 Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit Pragacz, Krzysztof Barczyński, Marcin Kuchciński, Rafał Zieliński, Andrzej Nawrot, Ireneusz Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common reasons for emergency surgery within the abdominal cavity in Poland. AIM: To compare outcomes of surgical treatment of AA using both classical (OA) and laparoscopic methods (LA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 299 patients (157 men and 142 women) operated on in 2008–2011 due to AA. The following comparisons between LA and OA were done: mean operative time, mean hospital stay after surgery, conversion rate, proportion of LA to OA in successive years. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 170 (56.9%) patients (74 men and 96 women), whereas OA was done in 89 (29.8%) patients (44 men and 45 women). In 13.4% of patients (24 men and 16 women) conversion from LA to OA was done. Mean operating time was 53.4 ±16.1 min (range: 25–100 min) for LA, and 55.4 ±20.2 min (range: 20–140 min) for OA; p = 0.64. Mean hospital stay after LA was 4.0 ±1.2 days (range: 2–9 days), while it was 6.0 ±4.2 days (range: 2–28 days) after OA; p < 0.001. Laparoscopic appendectomy was 24.1% of all appendectomies performed in the year 2008, 54.1% in the year 2009, and in consecutive years 71.7% in 2010 and 65.6% in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendectomy method did not require longer surgery times and entailed shorter hospital stays as compared with OA. In our opinion, LA should be the preferred approach in surgical treatment of AA in adults. Termedia Publishing House 2014-05-08 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4105682/ /pubmed/25097692 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.42511 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sekcja Wideochirurgii TChP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Pragacz, Krzysztof
Barczyński, Marcin
Kuchciński, Rafał
Zieliński, Andrzej
Nawrot, Ireneusz
Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title_full Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title_fullStr Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title_short Utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
title_sort utility of the laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of acute appendicitis in a single surgical unit
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097692
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.42511
work_keys_str_mv AT pragaczkrzysztof utilityofthelaparoscopicapproachtosurgicaltreatmentofacuteappendicitisinasinglesurgicalunit
AT barczynskimarcin utilityofthelaparoscopicapproachtosurgicaltreatmentofacuteappendicitisinasinglesurgicalunit
AT kuchcinskirafał utilityofthelaparoscopicapproachtosurgicaltreatmentofacuteappendicitisinasinglesurgicalunit
AT zielinskiandrzej utilityofthelaparoscopicapproachtosurgicaltreatmentofacuteappendicitisinasinglesurgicalunit
AT nawrotireneusz utilityofthelaparoscopicapproachtosurgicaltreatmentofacuteappendicitisinasinglesurgicalunit