Cargando…
Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24930545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729 |
_version_ | 1782327429743771648 |
---|---|
author | Moojen, Dirk Jan F Zwiers, Jasper H Scholtes, Vanessa AB Verheyen, Cees CPM Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_facet | Moojen, Dirk Jan F Zwiers, Jasper H Scholtes, Vanessa AB Verheyen, Cees CPM Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_sort | Moojen, Dirk Jan F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are necessary for optimal treatment. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients with acute THA infection, we retrospectively reviewed 68 patients treated in 2 large teaching hospitals. Hospital S used a protocol in which each patient received a single surgical debridement and only additional surgery if infectious symptoms persisted (group S; n = 33). In hospital M, patients always received multiple surgical debridements (group M; n = 35). Both groups received systemic antibiotic treatment. Removal of the implant or persistent infection at follow-up was considered failure of treatment. Mean follow-up of the patients was 5 (2–11) years. RESULTS: Mean time between implantation and debridement was 19 days. 4 patients in group S were considered failure, as opposed to 10 patients in group M (p = 0.09). 9 patients in group S had additional surgery, which resulted in 3 of the 4 failures. At final follow-up, 30 patients in group S and 33 patients in group M had a good clinical result (p = 0.6). INTERPRETATION: In patients with acute THA infection, a single debridement with only additional surgery on indication appears to be at least as successful for retention of the primary implant and control of infection as a strategy with multiple surgical debridements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4105769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41057692014-08-07 Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection Moojen, Dirk Jan F Zwiers, Jasper H Scholtes, Vanessa AB Verheyen, Cees CPM Poolman, Rudolf W Acta Orthop Hip and Pelvis BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are necessary for optimal treatment. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients with acute THA infection, we retrospectively reviewed 68 patients treated in 2 large teaching hospitals. Hospital S used a protocol in which each patient received a single surgical debridement and only additional surgery if infectious symptoms persisted (group S; n = 33). In hospital M, patients always received multiple surgical debridements (group M; n = 35). Both groups received systemic antibiotic treatment. Removal of the implant or persistent infection at follow-up was considered failure of treatment. Mean follow-up of the patients was 5 (2–11) years. RESULTS: Mean time between implantation and debridement was 19 days. 4 patients in group S were considered failure, as opposed to 10 patients in group M (p = 0.09). 9 patients in group S had additional surgery, which resulted in 3 of the 4 failures. At final follow-up, 30 patients in group S and 33 patients in group M had a good clinical result (p = 0.6). INTERPRETATION: In patients with acute THA infection, a single debridement with only additional surgery on indication appears to be at least as successful for retention of the primary implant and control of infection as a strategy with multiple surgical debridements. Informa Healthcare 2014-08 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4105769/ /pubmed/24930545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip and Pelvis Moojen, Dirk Jan F Zwiers, Jasper H Scholtes, Vanessa AB Verheyen, Cees CPM Poolman, Rudolf W Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title | Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title_full | Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title_fullStr | Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title_short | Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
title_sort | similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection |
topic | Hip and Pelvis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24930545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moojendirkjanf similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection AT zwiersjasperh similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection AT scholtesvanessaab similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection AT verheyenceescpm similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection AT poolmanrudolfw similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection |