Cargando…

Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection

BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moojen, Dirk Jan F, Zwiers, Jasper H, Scholtes, Vanessa AB, Verheyen, Cees CPM, Poolman, Rudolf W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24930545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729
_version_ 1782327429743771648
author Moojen, Dirk Jan F
Zwiers, Jasper H
Scholtes, Vanessa AB
Verheyen, Cees CPM
Poolman, Rudolf W
author_facet Moojen, Dirk Jan F
Zwiers, Jasper H
Scholtes, Vanessa AB
Verheyen, Cees CPM
Poolman, Rudolf W
author_sort Moojen, Dirk Jan F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are necessary for optimal treatment. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients with acute THA infection, we retrospectively reviewed 68 patients treated in 2 large teaching hospitals. Hospital S used a protocol in which each patient received a single surgical debridement and only additional surgery if infectious symptoms persisted (group S; n = 33). In hospital M, patients always received multiple surgical debridements (group M; n = 35). Both groups received systemic antibiotic treatment. Removal of the implant or persistent infection at follow-up was considered failure of treatment. Mean follow-up of the patients was 5 (2–11) years. RESULTS: Mean time between implantation and debridement was 19 days. 4 patients in group S were considered failure, as opposed to 10 patients in group M (p = 0.09). 9 patients in group S had additional surgery, which resulted in 3 of the 4 failures. At final follow-up, 30 patients in group S and 33 patients in group M had a good clinical result (p = 0.6). INTERPRETATION: In patients with acute THA infection, a single debridement with only additional surgery on indication appears to be at least as successful for retention of the primary implant and control of infection as a strategy with multiple surgical debridements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41057692014-08-07 Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection Moojen, Dirk Jan F Zwiers, Jasper H Scholtes, Vanessa AB Verheyen, Cees CPM Poolman, Rudolf W Acta Orthop Hip and Pelvis BACKGROUND: Treatment of an acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection aims at control of the infection with retention of the implant by surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment. There is no clear evidence whether a single surgical debridement is sufficient or whether multiple procedures are necessary for optimal treatment. METHODS: From a prospective database of patients with acute THA infection, we retrospectively reviewed 68 patients treated in 2 large teaching hospitals. Hospital S used a protocol in which each patient received a single surgical debridement and only additional surgery if infectious symptoms persisted (group S; n = 33). In hospital M, patients always received multiple surgical debridements (group M; n = 35). Both groups received systemic antibiotic treatment. Removal of the implant or persistent infection at follow-up was considered failure of treatment. Mean follow-up of the patients was 5 (2–11) years. RESULTS: Mean time between implantation and debridement was 19 days. 4 patients in group S were considered failure, as opposed to 10 patients in group M (p = 0.09). 9 patients in group S had additional surgery, which resulted in 3 of the 4 failures. At final follow-up, 30 patients in group S and 33 patients in group M had a good clinical result (p = 0.6). INTERPRETATION: In patients with acute THA infection, a single debridement with only additional surgery on indication appears to be at least as successful for retention of the primary implant and control of infection as a strategy with multiple surgical debridements. Informa Healthcare 2014-08 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4105769/ /pubmed/24930545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited.
spellingShingle Hip and Pelvis
Moojen, Dirk Jan F
Zwiers, Jasper H
Scholtes, Vanessa AB
Verheyen, Cees CPM
Poolman, Rudolf W
Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title_full Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title_fullStr Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title_full_unstemmed Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title_short Similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
title_sort similar success rates for single and multiple debridement surgery for acute hip arthroplasty infection
topic Hip and Pelvis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24930545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.927729
work_keys_str_mv AT moojendirkjanf similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection
AT zwiersjasperh similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection
AT scholtesvanessaab similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection
AT verheyenceescpm similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection
AT poolmanrudolfw similarsuccessratesforsingleandmultipledebridementsurgeryforacutehiparthroplastyinfection