Cargando…
The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196 |
_version_ | 1782327429990187008 |
---|---|
author | Lechler, Philipp Frink, Michael Gulati, Aashish Murray, David Renkawitz, Tobias Bücking, Benjamin Ruchholtz, Steffen Boese, Christoph Kolja |
author_facet | Lechler, Philipp Frink, Michael Gulati, Aashish Murray, David Renkawitz, Tobias Bücking, Benjamin Ruchholtz, Steffen Boese, Christoph Kolja |
author_sort | Lechler, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but the precise effect of rotation is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a novel method of assessing rotation-corrected femoral offset (FO(RC)), tested its clinical application in 222 AP hip radiographs following proximal femoral nailing, and validated it in 25 cases with corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: The mean FO(RC) was 57 (29–93) mm, which differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the mean FO(P) 49 (22–65) mm and from the mean femoral offset determined by the standard method: 49 (23–66) mm. FO(RC) correlated closely with femoral offset assessed by CT (FO(CT)); the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the assessment of FO(RC) by AP hip radiographs correlating the repeated measurements of 1 observer and of 2 independent blinded observers was 1.0 and 1.0, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Hip rotation affects the FO(P) on plain AP radiographs of the hip in a predictable way and should be adequately accounted for. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4105770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41057702014-08-07 The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs Lechler, Philipp Frink, Michael Gulati, Aashish Murray, David Renkawitz, Tobias Bücking, Benjamin Ruchholtz, Steffen Boese, Christoph Kolja Acta Orthop Hip and Pelvis BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but the precise effect of rotation is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a novel method of assessing rotation-corrected femoral offset (FO(RC)), tested its clinical application in 222 AP hip radiographs following proximal femoral nailing, and validated it in 25 cases with corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: The mean FO(RC) was 57 (29–93) mm, which differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the mean FO(P) 49 (22–65) mm and from the mean femoral offset determined by the standard method: 49 (23–66) mm. FO(RC) correlated closely with femoral offset assessed by CT (FO(CT)); the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the assessment of FO(RC) by AP hip radiographs correlating the repeated measurements of 1 observer and of 2 independent blinded observers was 1.0 and 1.0, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Hip rotation affects the FO(P) on plain AP radiographs of the hip in a predictable way and should be adequately accounted for. Informa Healthcare 2014-08 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4105770/ /pubmed/24954484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip and Pelvis Lechler, Philipp Frink, Michael Gulati, Aashish Murray, David Renkawitz, Tobias Bücking, Benjamin Ruchholtz, Steffen Boese, Christoph Kolja The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title | The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title_full | The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title_fullStr | The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title_short | The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
title_sort | influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs |
topic | Hip and Pelvis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lechlerphilipp theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT frinkmichael theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT gulatiaashish theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT murraydavid theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT renkawitztobias theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT buckingbenjamin theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT ruchholtzsteffen theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT boesechristophkolja theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT lechlerphilipp influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT frinkmichael influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT gulatiaashish influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT murraydavid influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT renkawitztobias influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT buckingbenjamin influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT ruchholtzsteffen influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs AT boesechristophkolja influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs |