Cargando…

The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lechler, Philipp, Frink, Michael, Gulati, Aashish, Murray, David, Renkawitz, Tobias, Bücking, Benjamin, Ruchholtz, Steffen, Boese, Christoph Kolja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196
_version_ 1782327429990187008
author Lechler, Philipp
Frink, Michael
Gulati, Aashish
Murray, David
Renkawitz, Tobias
Bücking, Benjamin
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Boese, Christoph Kolja
author_facet Lechler, Philipp
Frink, Michael
Gulati, Aashish
Murray, David
Renkawitz, Tobias
Bücking, Benjamin
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Boese, Christoph Kolja
author_sort Lechler, Philipp
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but the precise effect of rotation is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a novel method of assessing rotation-corrected femoral offset (FO(RC)), tested its clinical application in 222 AP hip radiographs following proximal femoral nailing, and validated it in 25 cases with corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: The mean FO(RC) was 57 (29–93) mm, which differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the mean FO(P) 49 (22–65) mm and from the mean femoral offset determined by the standard method: 49 (23–66) mm. FO(RC) correlated closely with femoral offset assessed by CT (FO(CT)); the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the assessment of FO(RC) by AP hip radiographs correlating the repeated measurements of 1 observer and of 2 independent blinded observers was 1.0 and 1.0, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Hip rotation affects the FO(P) on plain AP radiographs of the hip in a predictable way and should be adequately accounted for.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41057702014-08-07 The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs Lechler, Philipp Frink, Michael Gulati, Aashish Murray, David Renkawitz, Tobias Bücking, Benjamin Ruchholtz, Steffen Boese, Christoph Kolja Acta Orthop Hip and Pelvis BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FO(P)) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but the precise effect of rotation is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We developed a novel method of assessing rotation-corrected femoral offset (FO(RC)), tested its clinical application in 222 AP hip radiographs following proximal femoral nailing, and validated it in 25 cases with corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: The mean FO(RC) was 57 (29–93) mm, which differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the mean FO(P) 49 (22–65) mm and from the mean femoral offset determined by the standard method: 49 (23–66) mm. FO(RC) correlated closely with femoral offset assessed by CT (FO(CT)); the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.97). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the assessment of FO(RC) by AP hip radiographs correlating the repeated measurements of 1 observer and of 2 independent blinded observers was 1.0 and 1.0, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Hip rotation affects the FO(P) on plain AP radiographs of the hip in a predictable way and should be adequately accounted for. Informa Healthcare 2014-08 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4105770/ /pubmed/24954484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited.
spellingShingle Hip and Pelvis
Lechler, Philipp
Frink, Michael
Gulati, Aashish
Murray, David
Renkawitz, Tobias
Bücking, Benjamin
Ruchholtz, Steffen
Boese, Christoph Kolja
The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title_full The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title_fullStr The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title_full_unstemmed The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title_short The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
title_sort influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs
topic Hip and Pelvis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931196
work_keys_str_mv AT lechlerphilipp theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT frinkmichael theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT gulatiaashish theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT murraydavid theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT renkawitztobias theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT buckingbenjamin theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT ruchholtzsteffen theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT boesechristophkolja theinfluenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT lechlerphilipp influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT frinkmichael influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT gulatiaashish influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT murraydavid influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT renkawitztobias influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT buckingbenjamin influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT ruchholtzsteffen influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs
AT boesechristophkolja influenceofhiprotationonfemoraloffsetinplainradiographs