Cargando…

Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men

BACKGROUND: Despite rising international rates of obesity, men remain reluctant to participate in weight loss research. There is a lack of evidence to guide the development of effective weight loss interventions that engage men. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive process eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan, Philip J, Scott, Hayley A, Young, Myles D, Plotnikoff, Ronald C, Collins, Clare E, Callister, Robin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25011421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0089-9
_version_ 1782327449638404096
author Morgan, Philip J
Scott, Hayley A
Young, Myles D
Plotnikoff, Ronald C
Collins, Clare E
Callister, Robin
author_facet Morgan, Philip J
Scott, Hayley A
Young, Myles D
Plotnikoff, Ronald C
Collins, Clare E
Callister, Robin
author_sort Morgan, Philip J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite rising international rates of obesity, men remain reluctant to participate in weight loss research. There is a lack of evidence to guide the development of effective weight loss interventions that engage men. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive process evaluation of the SHED-IT (Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Information Technology) weight loss program for men, as delivered in the SHED-IT community weight loss trial, and to identify key components associated with success. METHODS: In an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial, 159 overweight and obese men (BMI 25.0-40.0 kg/m(2)) were randomised to one of two gender-tailored weight loss interventions with no face-to-face contact, or a control group. The interventions were informed by Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) with men encouraged to complete a Support Book containing SCT-based tasks including goal setting, reward setting, creation of social support strategies and self-monitoring of: i) weight, ii) physical activity, and iii) diet. At post-test, compliance with SCT tasks was examined and men also completed a process evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: Both SHED-IT intervention groups demonstrated greater weight loss during the intervention compared to the control, with no difference between intervention groups. Most men engaged with the SCT tasks although compliance declined over time and utilisation of social support networks and reward selection was poor. In a multiple regression model, the number of goals set (β [95% CI] = -0.3 [-0.6, -0.1], p = 0.01) and the number of weight records documented (β [95% CI] = -0.2 [-0.4, -0.0], p = 0.03) independently predicted weight loss. The process evaluation indicated that men found the programs to be supportive, enjoyable and beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation provides valuable information to inform the development of obesity treatment strategies that engage men. Future studies with men should include a strong focus on self-monitoring and goal setting to enhance behaviour change and improve treatment effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000699066.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4105870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41058702014-07-23 Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men Morgan, Philip J Scott, Hayley A Young, Myles D Plotnikoff, Ronald C Collins, Clare E Callister, Robin Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Despite rising international rates of obesity, men remain reluctant to participate in weight loss research. There is a lack of evidence to guide the development of effective weight loss interventions that engage men. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive process evaluation of the SHED-IT (Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Information Technology) weight loss program for men, as delivered in the SHED-IT community weight loss trial, and to identify key components associated with success. METHODS: In an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial, 159 overweight and obese men (BMI 25.0-40.0 kg/m(2)) were randomised to one of two gender-tailored weight loss interventions with no face-to-face contact, or a control group. The interventions were informed by Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) with men encouraged to complete a Support Book containing SCT-based tasks including goal setting, reward setting, creation of social support strategies and self-monitoring of: i) weight, ii) physical activity, and iii) diet. At post-test, compliance with SCT tasks was examined and men also completed a process evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: Both SHED-IT intervention groups demonstrated greater weight loss during the intervention compared to the control, with no difference between intervention groups. Most men engaged with the SCT tasks although compliance declined over time and utilisation of social support networks and reward selection was poor. In a multiple regression model, the number of goals set (β [95% CI] = -0.3 [-0.6, -0.1], p = 0.01) and the number of weight records documented (β [95% CI] = -0.2 [-0.4, -0.0], p = 0.03) independently predicted weight loss. The process evaluation indicated that men found the programs to be supportive, enjoyable and beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: This process evaluation provides valuable information to inform the development of obesity treatment strategies that engage men. Future studies with men should include a strong focus on self-monitoring and goal setting to enhance behaviour change and improve treatment effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000699066. BioMed Central 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4105870/ /pubmed/25011421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0089-9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Morgan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Morgan, Philip J
Scott, Hayley A
Young, Myles D
Plotnikoff, Ronald C
Collins, Clare E
Callister, Robin
Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title_full Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title_fullStr Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title_full_unstemmed Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title_short Associations between program outcomes and adherence to Social Cognitive Theory tasks: process evaluation of the SHED-IT community weight loss trial for men
title_sort associations between program outcomes and adherence to social cognitive theory tasks: process evaluation of the shed-it community weight loss trial for men
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4105870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25011421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0089-9
work_keys_str_mv AT morganphilipj associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen
AT scotthayleya associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen
AT youngmylesd associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen
AT plotnikoffronaldc associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen
AT collinsclaree associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen
AT callisterrobin associationsbetweenprogramoutcomesandadherencetosocialcognitivetheorytasksprocessevaluationofthesheditcommunityweightlosstrialformen