Cargando…

Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach

Where malaria is transmitted by zoophilic vectors, two types of malaria control strategies have been proposed based on animals: using livestock to divert vector biting from people (zooprophylaxis) or as baits to attract vectors to insecticide sources (insecticide-treated livestock). Opposing finding...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franco, Ana O., Gomes, M. Gabriela M., Rowland, Mark, Coleman, Paul G., Davies, Clive R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101699
_version_ 1782327534456668160
author Franco, Ana O.
Gomes, M. Gabriela M.
Rowland, Mark
Coleman, Paul G.
Davies, Clive R.
author_facet Franco, Ana O.
Gomes, M. Gabriela M.
Rowland, Mark
Coleman, Paul G.
Davies, Clive R.
author_sort Franco, Ana O.
collection PubMed
description Where malaria is transmitted by zoophilic vectors, two types of malaria control strategies have been proposed based on animals: using livestock to divert vector biting from people (zooprophylaxis) or as baits to attract vectors to insecticide sources (insecticide-treated livestock). Opposing findings have been obtained on malaria zooprophylaxis, and despite the success of an insecticide-treated livestock trial in Pakistan, where malaria vectors are highly zoophilic, its effectiveness is yet to be formally tested in Africa where vectors are more anthropophilic. This study aims to clarify the different effects of livestock on malaria and to understand under what circumstances livestock-based interventions could play a role in malaria control programmes. This was explored by developing a mathematical model and combining it with data from Pakistan and Ethiopia. Consistent with previous work, a zooprophylactic effect of untreated livestock is predicted in two situations: if vector population density does not increase with livestock introduction, or if livestock numbers and availability to vectors are sufficiently high such that the increase in vector density is counteracted by the diversion of bites from humans to animals. Although, as expected, insecticide-treatment of livestock is predicted to be more beneficial in settings with highly zoophilic vectors, like South Asia, we find that the intervention could also considerably decrease malaria transmission in regions with more anthropophilic vectors, like Anopheles arabiensis in Africa, under specific circumstances: high treatment coverage of the livestock population, using a product with stronger or longer lasting insecticidal effect than in the Pakistan trial, and with small (ideally null) repellency effect, or if increasing the attractiveness of treated livestock to malaria vectors. The results suggest these are the most appropriate conditions for field testing insecticide-treated livestock in an Africa region with moderately zoophilic vectors, where this intervention could contribute to the integrated control of malaria and livestock diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4106824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41068242014-07-23 Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach Franco, Ana O. Gomes, M. Gabriela M. Rowland, Mark Coleman, Paul G. Davies, Clive R. PLoS One Research Article Where malaria is transmitted by zoophilic vectors, two types of malaria control strategies have been proposed based on animals: using livestock to divert vector biting from people (zooprophylaxis) or as baits to attract vectors to insecticide sources (insecticide-treated livestock). Opposing findings have been obtained on malaria zooprophylaxis, and despite the success of an insecticide-treated livestock trial in Pakistan, where malaria vectors are highly zoophilic, its effectiveness is yet to be formally tested in Africa where vectors are more anthropophilic. This study aims to clarify the different effects of livestock on malaria and to understand under what circumstances livestock-based interventions could play a role in malaria control programmes. This was explored by developing a mathematical model and combining it with data from Pakistan and Ethiopia. Consistent with previous work, a zooprophylactic effect of untreated livestock is predicted in two situations: if vector population density does not increase with livestock introduction, or if livestock numbers and availability to vectors are sufficiently high such that the increase in vector density is counteracted by the diversion of bites from humans to animals. Although, as expected, insecticide-treatment of livestock is predicted to be more beneficial in settings with highly zoophilic vectors, like South Asia, we find that the intervention could also considerably decrease malaria transmission in regions with more anthropophilic vectors, like Anopheles arabiensis in Africa, under specific circumstances: high treatment coverage of the livestock population, using a product with stronger or longer lasting insecticidal effect than in the Pakistan trial, and with small (ideally null) repellency effect, or if increasing the attractiveness of treated livestock to malaria vectors. The results suggest these are the most appropriate conditions for field testing insecticide-treated livestock in an Africa region with moderately zoophilic vectors, where this intervention could contribute to the integrated control of malaria and livestock diseases. Public Library of Science 2014-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4106824/ /pubmed/25050703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101699 Text en © 2014 Franco et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Franco, Ana O.
Gomes, M. Gabriela M.
Rowland, Mark
Coleman, Paul G.
Davies, Clive R.
Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title_full Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title_fullStr Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title_full_unstemmed Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title_short Controlling Malaria Using Livestock-Based Interventions: A One Health Approach
title_sort controlling malaria using livestock-based interventions: a one health approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101699
work_keys_str_mv AT francoanao controllingmalariausinglivestockbasedinterventionsaonehealthapproach
AT gomesmgabrielam controllingmalariausinglivestockbasedinterventionsaonehealthapproach
AT rowlandmark controllingmalariausinglivestockbasedinterventionsaonehealthapproach
AT colemanpaulg controllingmalariausinglivestockbasedinterventionsaonehealthapproach
AT daviescliver controllingmalariausinglivestockbasedinterventionsaonehealthapproach