Cargando…
A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of ovulation detection by the DuoFertility(®) monitor compared with transvaginal ultrasound in infertile women with regular menstrual cycles. METHODS: Eight infertile patients, aged 27–40 years, with a body mass index of 19–29, regular...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S59080 |
_version_ | 1782327557643829248 |
---|---|
author | Rollason, Jennie CB Outtrim, Joanne G Mathur, Raj S |
author_facet | Rollason, Jennie CB Outtrim, Joanne G Mathur, Raj S |
author_sort | Rollason, Jennie CB |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of ovulation detection by the DuoFertility(®) monitor compared with transvaginal ultrasound in infertile women with regular menstrual cycles. METHODS: Eight infertile patients, aged 27–40 years, with a body mass index of 19–29, regular menses, normal ovaries on pelvic ultrasound scan, and normal early follicular luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin were recruited from infertility clinics in primary and secondary care for this pilot, prospective, observational study. The patients were asked to use the DuoFertility monitor for the whole cycle, with investigators and patients blind to DuoFertility data. Daily urine LH monitoring commenced on cycle day 8, with daily transvaginal ultrasound following the first positive LH until ovulation was observed. Ovulation was further confirmed by serum progesterone. The main outcome measure was detection of ovulation by the DuoFertility monitor, and correlation between day of ovulation assessed by DuoFertility and ultrasound. RESULTS: DuoFertility identified ovulation as having occurred within one day of that determined via ultrasound in all cycles. The sensitivity of ovulation detection was 100% (95% confidence interval 82–100). The specificity could not be concluded from the data. CONCLUSION: In infertile women with regular cycles, the DuoFertility monitor appears to accurately identify ovulatory cycles and the day of ovulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4106957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41069572014-07-29 A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women Rollason, Jennie CB Outtrim, Joanne G Mathur, Raj S Int J Womens Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of ovulation detection by the DuoFertility(®) monitor compared with transvaginal ultrasound in infertile women with regular menstrual cycles. METHODS: Eight infertile patients, aged 27–40 years, with a body mass index of 19–29, regular menses, normal ovaries on pelvic ultrasound scan, and normal early follicular luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone, and prolactin were recruited from infertility clinics in primary and secondary care for this pilot, prospective, observational study. The patients were asked to use the DuoFertility monitor for the whole cycle, with investigators and patients blind to DuoFertility data. Daily urine LH monitoring commenced on cycle day 8, with daily transvaginal ultrasound following the first positive LH until ovulation was observed. Ovulation was further confirmed by serum progesterone. The main outcome measure was detection of ovulation by the DuoFertility monitor, and correlation between day of ovulation assessed by DuoFertility and ultrasound. RESULTS: DuoFertility identified ovulation as having occurred within one day of that determined via ultrasound in all cycles. The sensitivity of ovulation detection was 100% (95% confidence interval 82–100). The specificity could not be concluded from the data. CONCLUSION: In infertile women with regular cycles, the DuoFertility monitor appears to accurately identify ovulatory cycles and the day of ovulation. Dove Medical Press 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4106957/ /pubmed/25075200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S59080 Text en © 2014 Rollason et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Rollason, Jennie CB Outtrim, Joanne G Mathur, Raj S A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title | A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title_full | A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title_fullStr | A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title_short | A pilot study comparing the DuoFertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
title_sort | pilot study comparing the duofertility(®) monitor with ultrasound in infertile women |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075200 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S59080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rollasonjenniecb apilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen AT outtrimjoanneg apilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen AT mathurrajs apilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen AT rollasonjenniecb pilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen AT outtrimjoanneg pilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen AT mathurrajs pilotstudycomparingtheduofertilitymonitorwithultrasoundininfertilewomen |