Cargando…

Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks

INTRODUCTION: The Apixaban for the Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE), Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY), and Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deitelzweig, Steve, Amin, Alpesh, Jing, Yonghua, Makenbaeva, Dinara, Wiederkehr, Daniel, Lin, Jay, Graham, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4107424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25135394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-013-0020-5
_version_ 1782327593698066432
author Deitelzweig, Steve
Amin, Alpesh
Jing, Yonghua
Makenbaeva, Dinara
Wiederkehr, Daniel
Lin, Jay
Graham, John
author_facet Deitelzweig, Steve
Amin, Alpesh
Jing, Yonghua
Makenbaeva, Dinara
Wiederkehr, Daniel
Lin, Jay
Graham, John
author_sort Deitelzweig, Steve
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Apixaban for the Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE), Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY), and Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trials demonstrated that the oral anticoagulants (OACs), apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively, are efficacious for stroke prevention among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Based on clinical trial results this study evaluated medical costs of clinical events associated with use of individual OACs relative to those of warfarin in NVAF patients with moderate and high stroke risk. METHODS: Rates for primary and secondary efficacy and safety outcomes (i.e., clinical events) among NVAF patients with CHADS(2) = 2 and ≥3 were determined from the three OAC trials. One-year incremental costs among patients with clinical events from a US payer perspective were obtained from the literature and inflation adjusted to 2010 costs. Medical costs for clinical events associated with each OAC vs. warfarin were estimated and compared. RESULTS: For NVAF patients with moderate stroke risk (CHADS(2) = 2) differences in clinical event medical costs vs. warfarin were −$298, −$143, and +$117 per patient year for apixaban, dabigatran (150 mg), and rivaroxaban, respectively (negative numbers indicate cost reduction). For NVAF patients with high stroke risk (CHADS(2) ≥ 3) differences in clinical event medical costs vs. warfarin were −$697, +$2, and −$100 for apixaban, dabigatran (150 mg), and rivaroxaban, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medical cost differences associated with OACs vs. warfarin vary according to stroke risk. Of the three OACs, apixaban demonstrated consistent medical cost reductions vs. warfarin for NVAF patients with moderate and high stroke risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4107424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41074242014-07-24 Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks Deitelzweig, Steve Amin, Alpesh Jing, Yonghua Makenbaeva, Dinara Wiederkehr, Daniel Lin, Jay Graham, John Cardiol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Apixaban for the Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE), Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY), and Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET-AF) trials demonstrated that the oral anticoagulants (OACs), apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban, respectively, are efficacious for stroke prevention among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. Based on clinical trial results this study evaluated medical costs of clinical events associated with use of individual OACs relative to those of warfarin in NVAF patients with moderate and high stroke risk. METHODS: Rates for primary and secondary efficacy and safety outcomes (i.e., clinical events) among NVAF patients with CHADS(2) = 2 and ≥3 were determined from the three OAC trials. One-year incremental costs among patients with clinical events from a US payer perspective were obtained from the literature and inflation adjusted to 2010 costs. Medical costs for clinical events associated with each OAC vs. warfarin were estimated and compared. RESULTS: For NVAF patients with moderate stroke risk (CHADS(2) = 2) differences in clinical event medical costs vs. warfarin were −$298, −$143, and +$117 per patient year for apixaban, dabigatran (150 mg), and rivaroxaban, respectively (negative numbers indicate cost reduction). For NVAF patients with high stroke risk (CHADS(2) ≥ 3) differences in clinical event medical costs vs. warfarin were −$697, +$2, and −$100 for apixaban, dabigatran (150 mg), and rivaroxaban, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Medical cost differences associated with OACs vs. warfarin vary according to stroke risk. Of the three OACs, apixaban demonstrated consistent medical cost reductions vs. warfarin for NVAF patients with moderate and high stroke risks. Springer Healthcare 2013-08-17 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4107424/ /pubmed/25135394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-013-0020-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Deitelzweig, Steve
Amin, Alpesh
Jing, Yonghua
Makenbaeva, Dinara
Wiederkehr, Daniel
Lin, Jay
Graham, John
Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title_full Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title_fullStr Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title_full_unstemmed Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title_short Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
title_sort medical costs of oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation patients with different stroke risks
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4107424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25135394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40119-013-0020-5
work_keys_str_mv AT deitelzweigsteve medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT aminalpesh medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT jingyonghua medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT makenbaevadinara medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT wiederkehrdaniel medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT linjay medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks
AT grahamjohn medicalcostsoforalanticoagulantsvswarfarinforatrialfibrillationpatientswithdifferentstrokerisks