Cargando…

Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope is taught to medical students as it is a lifesaving procedure. However, it is a difficult technique to learn and the consequences of intubation failure are potentially serious. The Airtraq optical laryngoscope is a relatively novel intubati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Hong, Feng, Yi, Zhou, Yanyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4107482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-144
_version_ 1782327602756714496
author Zhao, Hong
Feng, Yi
Zhou, Yanyan
author_facet Zhao, Hong
Feng, Yi
Zhou, Yanyan
author_sort Zhao, Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope is taught to medical students as it is a lifesaving procedure. However, it is a difficult technique to learn and the consequences of intubation failure are potentially serious. The Airtraq optical laryngoscope is a relatively novel intubation device, which allows visualization of the glottic plane without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes, possessing advantages over Macintosh for novice personnel. We introduced a teaching mode featured with a progressive evaluation scheme for preparation and performance of tracheal intubation with medical students in this prospective randomized crossover trial who had no prior airway management experience to find the superior one. METHODS: Twenty-six medical students of the 8-year programme in the 6th year participated in this trial, when they did their one-week rotation in the department of anaesthesiology. Each of the students intubated 6 patients, who were scheduled for surgeries under general anaesthesia, each laryngoscope for 3 patients respectively. One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients scheduled for surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo tracheal intubation using Macintosh (n = 75) or Airtraq (n =74) laryngoscope. The progressive evaluation scheme was applied to each intubation attempt. RESULTS: Intubation success rate was significantly higher in Airtraq group than Macintosh group (87.8% vs. 66.7%, P < 0.05). Duration of glottis exposure was significantly shorter in Airtraq group compared to Macintosh group (50 ± 19 s vs. 81 ± 27 s, P < 0.001). A grade I Cormack and Lehane glottic view was obtained in 94.6% of patients in the Airtraq group versus 32% of patients in the Macintosh group (P <0.001). Duration of intubation in Airtraq group was significantly shorter (68 ± 21 s vs. 96 ± 22 s, P < 0.05) compared to Macintosh group. CONCLUSIONS: Airtraq laryngoscope is easier to master for novice personnel with a higher intubation success rate and shorter intubation duration compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number is ChiCTR-TRC-13003987, approval date Dec 12, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4107482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41074822014-07-24 Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope Zhao, Hong Feng, Yi Zhou, Yanyan BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope is taught to medical students as it is a lifesaving procedure. However, it is a difficult technique to learn and the consequences of intubation failure are potentially serious. The Airtraq optical laryngoscope is a relatively novel intubation device, which allows visualization of the glottic plane without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal, and tracheal axes, possessing advantages over Macintosh for novice personnel. We introduced a teaching mode featured with a progressive evaluation scheme for preparation and performance of tracheal intubation with medical students in this prospective randomized crossover trial who had no prior airway management experience to find the superior one. METHODS: Twenty-six medical students of the 8-year programme in the 6th year participated in this trial, when they did their one-week rotation in the department of anaesthesiology. Each of the students intubated 6 patients, who were scheduled for surgeries under general anaesthesia, each laryngoscope for 3 patients respectively. One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients scheduled for surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo tracheal intubation using Macintosh (n = 75) or Airtraq (n =74) laryngoscope. The progressive evaluation scheme was applied to each intubation attempt. RESULTS: Intubation success rate was significantly higher in Airtraq group than Macintosh group (87.8% vs. 66.7%, P < 0.05). Duration of glottis exposure was significantly shorter in Airtraq group compared to Macintosh group (50 ± 19 s vs. 81 ± 27 s, P < 0.001). A grade I Cormack and Lehane glottic view was obtained in 94.6% of patients in the Airtraq group versus 32% of patients in the Macintosh group (P <0.001). Duration of intubation in Airtraq group was significantly shorter (68 ± 21 s vs. 96 ± 22 s, P < 0.05) compared to Macintosh group. CONCLUSIONS: Airtraq laryngoscope is easier to master for novice personnel with a higher intubation success rate and shorter intubation duration compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number is ChiCTR-TRC-13003987, approval date Dec 12, 2013. BioMed Central 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4107482/ /pubmed/25027257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-144 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zhao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Hong
Feng, Yi
Zhou, Yanyan
Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title_full Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title_fullStr Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title_full_unstemmed Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title_short Teaching tracheal intubation: Airtraq is superior to Macintosh laryngoscope
title_sort teaching tracheal intubation: airtraq is superior to macintosh laryngoscope
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4107482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-144
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaohong teachingtrachealintubationairtraqissuperiortomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT fengyi teachingtrachealintubationairtraqissuperiortomacintoshlaryngoscope
AT zhouyanyan teachingtrachealintubationairtraqissuperiortomacintoshlaryngoscope