Cargando…

An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: All mothers in South Australia are offered a clinic or home-visit by a Child and Family Health community nurse in the initial postnatal weeks. Subsequent support is available on request from staff in community clinics and from a telephone helpline. The aim of the present study is to comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawyer, Alyssa CP, Lynch, John, Bowering, Kerrie, Jeffs, Debra, Clark, Jenny, Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine, Sawyer, Michael G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-119
_version_ 1782327692372213760
author Sawyer, Alyssa CP
Lynch, John
Bowering, Kerrie
Jeffs, Debra
Clark, Jenny
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Sawyer, Michael G
author_facet Sawyer, Alyssa CP
Lynch, John
Bowering, Kerrie
Jeffs, Debra
Clark, Jenny
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Sawyer, Michael G
author_sort Sawyer, Alyssa CP
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: All mothers in South Australia are offered a clinic or home-visit by a Child and Family Health community nurse in the initial postnatal weeks. Subsequent support is available on request from staff in community clinics and from a telephone helpline. The aim of the present study is to compare equivalence of a single clinic-based appointment plus a nurse-moderated group-based internet intervention when infants were aged 0–6 months versus a single home-visit together with subsequent standard services (the latter support was available to mothers in both study groups). METHODS/DESIGN: The evaluation utilised a pragmatic preference randomised trial comparing the equivalence of outcomes for mothers and infants across the two study groups. Eligible mothers were those whose services were provided by nurses working in one of six community clinics in the metropolitan region of Adelaide. Mothers were excluded if they did not have internet access, required an interpreter, or their nurse clinician recommended that they not participate due to issues such as domestic violence or substance abuse. Randomisation was based on the service identification number sequentially assigned to infants when referred to the Child and Family Health Services from birthing units (this was done by administrative staff who had no involvement in recruiting mothers, delivering the intervention, or analyzing results for the study). Consistent with design and power calculations, 819 mothers were recruited to the trial. The primary outcomes for the trial are parents’ sense of competence and self-efficacy measured using standard self-report questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include the quality of mother-infant relationships, maternal social support, role satisfaction and maternal mental health, infant social-emotional and language development, and patterns of service utilisation. Maternal and infant outcomes will be evaluated using age-appropriate questionnaires when infants are aged <2 months (pre-intervention), 9, 15, and 21 months. DISCUSSION: We know of no previous study that has evaluated an intervention that combines the capacity of nurse and internet-based services to improve outcomes for mothers and infants. The knowledge gained from this study will inform the design and conduct of community-based postnatal mother and child support programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000204741
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4108010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41080102014-07-24 An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial Sawyer, Alyssa CP Lynch, John Bowering, Kerrie Jeffs, Debra Clark, Jenny Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine Sawyer, Michael G BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: All mothers in South Australia are offered a clinic or home-visit by a Child and Family Health community nurse in the initial postnatal weeks. Subsequent support is available on request from staff in community clinics and from a telephone helpline. The aim of the present study is to compare equivalence of a single clinic-based appointment plus a nurse-moderated group-based internet intervention when infants were aged 0–6 months versus a single home-visit together with subsequent standard services (the latter support was available to mothers in both study groups). METHODS/DESIGN: The evaluation utilised a pragmatic preference randomised trial comparing the equivalence of outcomes for mothers and infants across the two study groups. Eligible mothers were those whose services were provided by nurses working in one of six community clinics in the metropolitan region of Adelaide. Mothers were excluded if they did not have internet access, required an interpreter, or their nurse clinician recommended that they not participate due to issues such as domestic violence or substance abuse. Randomisation was based on the service identification number sequentially assigned to infants when referred to the Child and Family Health Services from birthing units (this was done by administrative staff who had no involvement in recruiting mothers, delivering the intervention, or analyzing results for the study). Consistent with design and power calculations, 819 mothers were recruited to the trial. The primary outcomes for the trial are parents’ sense of competence and self-efficacy measured using standard self-report questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include the quality of mother-infant relationships, maternal social support, role satisfaction and maternal mental health, infant social-emotional and language development, and patterns of service utilisation. Maternal and infant outcomes will be evaluated using age-appropriate questionnaires when infants are aged <2 months (pre-intervention), 9, 15, and 21 months. DISCUSSION: We know of no previous study that has evaluated an intervention that combines the capacity of nurse and internet-based services to improve outcomes for mothers and infants. The knowledge gained from this study will inform the design and conduct of community-based postnatal mother and child support programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000204741 BioMed Central 2014-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4108010/ /pubmed/24886238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-119 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sawyer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sawyer, Alyssa CP
Lynch, John
Bowering, Kerrie
Jeffs, Debra
Clark, Jenny
Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine
Sawyer, Michael G
An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title_full An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title_short An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
title_sort equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-119
work_keys_str_mv AT sawyeralyssacp anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lynchjohn anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boweringkerrie anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jeffsdebra anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkjenny anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mpundukaambwachristine anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sawyermichaelg anequivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sawyeralyssacp equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lynchjohn equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boweringkerrie equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT jeffsdebra equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkjenny equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mpundukaambwachristine equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sawyermichaelg equivalenceevaluationofanursemoderatedgroupbasedinternetsupportprogramfornewmothersversusstandardcareapragmaticpreferencerandomisedcontrolledtrial