Cargando…

Topical Isopropyl Unoprostone for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Microperimetric Results of the Phase 2 Clinical Study

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether topical 0.15% isopropyl unoprostone (IU), a BK-channel activator, could improve or maintain the central retinal sensitivity in patients with middle- to late-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). IU was approved for glaucoma and ocular hyper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamamoto, Shuichi, Sugawara, Takeshi, Murakami, Akira, Nakazawa, Mitsuru, Nao-i, Nobuhisa, Machida, Shigeki, Wada, Yuko, Mashima, Yukihiko, Myake, Yozo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare Communications 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25135585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-012-0005-9
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether topical 0.15% isopropyl unoprostone (IU), a BK-channel activator, could improve or maintain the central retinal sensitivity in patients with middle- to late-stage retinitis pigmentosa (RP). IU was approved for glaucoma and ocular hypertension in 1994. The drug re-profiling strategy is one of the effective ways to develop safe drugs for patients with RP. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled phase II safety/efficacy trial was conducted. One hundred and nine patients with middle- to late-stage RP having a visual acuity of ≥0.5 were studied at six ophthalmological centers in Japan. The treatments of IU/day were divided into three groups: placebo group; two-drop group; and four-drop group for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure was changes in the retinal sensitivity from baseline in the central 2° determined by MP-1 microperimetry (MP-1, Nidek, Japan). The secondary outcomes were changes in best-correct visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, retinal sensitivity of the central 10° by MP-1, mean deviation (MD) by a Humphrey field analyzer (HFA; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA) 10-2, and the Visual Functioning Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25) questionnaire scores. RESULTS: There was a tendency for a dose-dependent responsiveness in retinal sensitivity in the central 2°, MD, and total VFQ-25 score after 24 weeks of IU instillation by a simple linear regression analysis. A stratified analysis showed a significant dose-dependent responsiveness of the 2° central retinal sensitivity in more advanced patients (P = 0.028). The number of patients having a ≥4 dB decrease in the primary outcome measure was significantly fewer in the four-drop group than in the placebo group (P = 0.02). No adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A higher dose of IU can delay progression of the central retinal sensitivity decrease through an improvement of retinal sensitivity.