Cargando…
Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914 |
_version_ | 1782327768662409216 |
---|---|
author | Freitas, Anderson Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues da Costa, Hélio Ismael Maciel, Rafael Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo |
author_facet | Freitas, Anderson Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues da Costa, Hélio Ismael Maciel, Rafael Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo |
author_sort | Freitas, Anderson |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixation of 70((o)) tilt femoral neck osteotomy was performed using three 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm of displacement, and rotational deviation (phase 1) and with 10 mm offset (phase 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: the values of the test group in phase 1, in sample 1-5 had a mean of 517N and SD = 96N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.79° e SD = 2. 03°. In phase 2, mean was 649N and SD = 94N. The values of the maximum load in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N; respectively. Statistical analysis between the groups showed a statistically significant lower value in the test group. CONCLUSION: the analysis of mechanical resistance between the groups has determined statistically significant value for the test group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, CASE-CONTROL STUDY. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4108699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41086992014-07-24 Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone Freitas, Anderson Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues da Costa, Hélio Ismael Maciel, Rafael Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixation of 70((o)) tilt femoral neck osteotomy was performed using three 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm of displacement, and rotational deviation (phase 1) and with 10 mm offset (phase 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: the values of the test group in phase 1, in sample 1-5 had a mean of 517N and SD = 96N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.79° e SD = 2. 03°. In phase 2, mean was 649N and SD = 94N. The values of the maximum load in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N; respectively. Statistical analysis between the groups showed a statistically significant lower value in the test group. CONCLUSION: the analysis of mechanical resistance between the groups has determined statistically significant value for the test group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, CASE-CONTROL STUDY. Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4108699/ /pubmed/25061423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914 Text en |
spellingShingle | Original Article Freitas, Anderson Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues da Costa, Hélio Ismael Maciel, Rafael Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title | Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title_full | Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title_fullStr | Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title_short | Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
title_sort | mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freitasanderson mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone AT azevedobrunaalvessoares mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone AT desouzarobertorodrigues mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone AT dacostahelioismael mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone AT macielrafaelalmeida mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone AT soutodiogoranierdemacedo mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone |