Cargando…

Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone

OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Anderson, Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares, de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues, da Costa, Hélio Ismael, Maciel, Rafael Almeida, Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914
_version_ 1782327768662409216
author Freitas, Anderson
Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares
de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues
da Costa, Hélio Ismael
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo
author_facet Freitas, Anderson
Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares
de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues
da Costa, Hélio Ismael
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo
author_sort Freitas, Anderson
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixation of 70((o)) tilt femoral neck osteotomy was performed using three 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm of displacement, and rotational deviation (phase 1) and with 10 mm offset (phase 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: the values of the test group in phase 1, in sample 1-5 had a mean of 517N and SD = 96N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.79° e SD = 2. 03°. In phase 2, mean was 649N and SD = 94N. The values of the maximum load in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N; respectively. Statistical analysis between the groups showed a statistically significant lower value in the test group. CONCLUSION: the analysis of mechanical resistance between the groups has determined statistically significant value for the test group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, CASE-CONTROL STUDY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4108699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41086992014-07-24 Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone Freitas, Anderson Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues da Costa, Hélio Ismael Maciel, Rafael Almeida Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze statistically results obtained between biomechanical assays on fixation of femoral neck fracture type Pauwels III, on synthetic bone, using 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws and control group. METHODS: Ten synthetic bones from a national brand were used. Test group: fixation of 70((o)) tilt femoral neck osteotomy was performed using three 7.5 mm non parallel cannulated screws. We analyzed the resistance of this fixation with 5 mm of displacement, and rotational deviation (phase 1) and with 10 mm offset (phase 2). Control group: the models were tested in their integrity until the femoral neck fracture occurred. RESULTS: the values of the test group in phase 1, in sample 1-5 had a mean of 517N and SD = 96N. Rotational deviations showed a mean of 3.79° e SD = 2. 03°. In phase 2, mean was 649N and SD = 94N. The values of the maximum load in the control group were: 1544N, 1110N, 1359N, 1194N, 1437N; respectively. Statistical analysis between the groups showed a statistically significant lower value in the test group. CONCLUSION: the analysis of mechanical resistance between the groups has determined statistically significant value for the test group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, CASE-CONTROL STUDY. Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4108699/ /pubmed/25061423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914 Text en
spellingShingle Original Article
Freitas, Anderson
Azevedo, Bruna Alves Soares
de Souza, Roberto Rodrigues
da Costa, Hélio Ismael
Maciel, Rafael Almeida
Souto, Diogo Ranier de Macedo
Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title_full Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title_fullStr Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title_short Mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
title_sort mechanical analysis of femoral neck fracture fixation in synthetic bone
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300914
work_keys_str_mv AT freitasanderson mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone
AT azevedobrunaalvessoares mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone
AT desouzarobertorodrigues mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone
AT dacostahelioismael mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone
AT macielrafaelalmeida mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone
AT soutodiogoranierdemacedo mechanicalanalysisoffemoralneckfracturefixationinsyntheticbone