Cargando…

Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate safety and reliability of internal fixator for the treatment of intra-articular and periarticular distal femur fractures. METHODS: Retrospective data evaluation of 28 patients with 29 fractures fixed with internal fixator was performed. There was a predominance of male patients (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda, Salim, Rodrigo, Paccola, Cleber Antonio Jansen, Kfuri, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300509
_version_ 1782327768886804480
author Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda
Salim, Rodrigo
Paccola, Cleber Antonio Jansen
Kfuri, Mauricio
author_facet Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda
Salim, Rodrigo
Paccola, Cleber Antonio Jansen
Kfuri, Mauricio
author_sort Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate safety and reliability of internal fixator for the treatment of intra-articular and periarticular distal femur fractures. METHODS: Retrospective data evaluation of 28 patients with 29 fractures fixed with internal fixator was performed. There was a predominance of male patients (53.5%), with 52% of open wound fractures, 76% of AO33C type fractures, and a mean follow up of 21.3 months. Time of fracture healing, mechanical axis deviation, rate of infection and postoperative complications were registered. RESULTS: Healing rate was 93% in this sample, with an average time of 5.5 months. Twenty-seven percent of patients ended up with mechanical axis deviation, mostly resulting from poor primary intra-operative reduction. There were two cases of implant loosening; two implant breakage, and three patients presented stiff knee. No case of infection was observed. Healing rate in this study was comparable with current literature; there was a high degree of angular deviation, especially in the coronal plane. CONCLUSION: Internal fixators are a breakthrough in the treatment of knee fractures, but its use does not preclude application of principles of anatomical articular reduction and mechanical axis restoration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4108700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41087002014-07-24 Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures? Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda Salim, Rodrigo Paccola, Cleber Antonio Jansen Kfuri, Mauricio Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: Evaluate safety and reliability of internal fixator for the treatment of intra-articular and periarticular distal femur fractures. METHODS: Retrospective data evaluation of 28 patients with 29 fractures fixed with internal fixator was performed. There was a predominance of male patients (53.5%), with 52% of open wound fractures, 76% of AO33C type fractures, and a mean follow up of 21.3 months. Time of fracture healing, mechanical axis deviation, rate of infection and postoperative complications were registered. RESULTS: Healing rate was 93% in this sample, with an average time of 5.5 months. Twenty-seven percent of patients ended up with mechanical axis deviation, mostly resulting from poor primary intra-operative reduction. There were two cases of implant loosening; two implant breakage, and three patients presented stiff knee. No case of infection was observed. Healing rate in this study was comparable with current literature; there was a high degree of angular deviation, especially in the coronal plane. CONCLUSION: Internal fixators are a breakthrough in the treatment of knee fractures, but its use does not preclude application of principles of anatomical articular reduction and mechanical axis restoration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II, RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4108700/ /pubmed/25061424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300509 Text en
spellingShingle Original Article
Batista, Bruno Bellaguarda
Salim, Rodrigo
Paccola, Cleber Antonio Jansen
Kfuri, Mauricio
Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title_full Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title_fullStr Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title_full_unstemmed Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title_short Internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
title_sort internal fixators: a safe option for managing distal femur fractures?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220300509
work_keys_str_mv AT batistabrunobellaguarda internalfixatorsasafeoptionformanagingdistalfemurfractures
AT salimrodrigo internalfixatorsasafeoptionformanagingdistalfemurfractures
AT paccolacleberantoniojansen internalfixatorsasafeoptionformanagingdistalfemurfractures
AT kfurimauricio internalfixatorsasafeoptionformanagingdistalfemurfractures