Cargando…
The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: 187,000 hip and knee joint replacements are performed every year in the National Health Service (NHS). One of the commonest complications is surgical site infection (SSI), and this represents a significant burden in terms of patient morbidity, mortality and cost to health services around...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-237 |
_version_ | 1782327820232425472 |
---|---|
author | Sprowson, Andrew P Jensen, Cyrus D Parsons, Nick Partington, Paul Emmerson, Kevin Carluke, Ian Asaad, Seif Pratt, Roland Muller, Scott Reed, Mike R |
author_facet | Sprowson, Andrew P Jensen, Cyrus D Parsons, Nick Partington, Paul Emmerson, Kevin Carluke, Ian Asaad, Seif Pratt, Roland Muller, Scott Reed, Mike R |
author_sort | Sprowson, Andrew P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: 187,000 hip and knee joint replacements are performed every year in the National Health Service (NHS). One of the commonest complications is surgical site infection (SSI), and this represents a significant burden in terms of patient morbidity, mortality and cost to health services around the world. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to determine if the addition of triclosan coated sutures to a standard regimen can reduce the rate of SSI after total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR). METHODS: 2400 patients due to undergo a total hip or knee replacement are being recruited into this two-centre RCT. Participants are recruited before surgery and randomised to either standard care or intervention group. Participants, outcome assessors and statistician are blind to treatment allocation throughout the study. The intervention consists of triclosan coated sutures vs. standard non-coated sutures. The primary outcome is the Health protection Agency (HPA) defined superficial surgical site infection at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include HPA defined deep surgical site infection at 12 months, length of hospital stay, critical care stay, and payer costs. DISCUSSION: To date there are no orthopaedic randomised controlled trials on this scale assessing the effectiveness of a surgical intervention, particularly those that can be translated across the surgical specialities. The results from this trial will inform evidence-based recommendations for suture selection in the management of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. If triclosan coated sutures are found to be an effective intervention, implementation into clinical practice could improve long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 17807356. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4108972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41089722014-07-25 The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial Sprowson, Andrew P Jensen, Cyrus D Parsons, Nick Partington, Paul Emmerson, Kevin Carluke, Ian Asaad, Seif Pratt, Roland Muller, Scott Reed, Mike R BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: 187,000 hip and knee joint replacements are performed every year in the National Health Service (NHS). One of the commonest complications is surgical site infection (SSI), and this represents a significant burden in terms of patient morbidity, mortality and cost to health services around the world. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to determine if the addition of triclosan coated sutures to a standard regimen can reduce the rate of SSI after total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR). METHODS: 2400 patients due to undergo a total hip or knee replacement are being recruited into this two-centre RCT. Participants are recruited before surgery and randomised to either standard care or intervention group. Participants, outcome assessors and statistician are blind to treatment allocation throughout the study. The intervention consists of triclosan coated sutures vs. standard non-coated sutures. The primary outcome is the Health protection Agency (HPA) defined superficial surgical site infection at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include HPA defined deep surgical site infection at 12 months, length of hospital stay, critical care stay, and payer costs. DISCUSSION: To date there are no orthopaedic randomised controlled trials on this scale assessing the effectiveness of a surgical intervention, particularly those that can be translated across the surgical specialities. The results from this trial will inform evidence-based recommendations for suture selection in the management of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. If triclosan coated sutures are found to be an effective intervention, implementation into clinical practice could improve long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hip and knee replacement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 17807356. BioMed Central 2014-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4108972/ /pubmed/25027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-237 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sprowson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sprowson, Andrew P Jensen, Cyrus D Parsons, Nick Partington, Paul Emmerson, Kevin Carluke, Ian Asaad, Seif Pratt, Roland Muller, Scott Reed, Mike R The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title | The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of Surgical Site Infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of triclosan coated sutures on rate of surgical site infection after hip and knee replacement: a protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4108972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-237 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sprowsonandrewp theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jensencyrusd theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT parsonsnick theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT partingtonpaul theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT emmersonkevin theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carlukeian theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT asaadseif theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT prattroland theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mullerscott theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reedmiker theeffectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sprowsonandrewp effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jensencyrusd effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT parsonsnick effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT partingtonpaul effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT emmersonkevin effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carlukeian effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT asaadseif effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT prattroland effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mullerscott effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT reedmiker effectoftriclosancoatedsuturesonrateofsurgicalsiteinfectionafterhipandkneereplacementaprotocolforadoubleblindrandomisedcontrolledtrial |