Cargando…

New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?

BACKGROUND: After an acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin is still a standard of care, but several new approaches have been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The present study re-examined the studies published thus far on this topic to evaluate the effectiveness o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messori, Andrea, Fadda, Valeria, Gatto, Roberta, Maratea, Dario, Trippoli, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Safnek 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177676
_version_ 1782327828443824128
author Messori, Andrea
Fadda, Valeria
Gatto, Roberta
Maratea, Dario
Trippoli, Sabrina
author_facet Messori, Andrea
Fadda, Valeria
Gatto, Roberta
Maratea, Dario
Trippoli, Sabrina
author_sort Messori, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After an acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin is still a standard of care, but several new approaches have been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The present study re-examined the studies published thus far on this topic to evaluate the effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy in comparison to some of these new approaches (mainly, ticagrelor + aspirin and dual therapy plus a new oral anticoagulant [NOAC]; i.e., “triple therapy”). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical material was directly derived from that reported in recent meta-analyses. Our re-analysis relied on standard equivalence methods in which interpretation is based on Relative Risks (RRs) along with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). The equivalence margins employed in our statistical testing were directly derived from those reported in randomized studies. RESULTS: The equivalence margins were initially set at RR ranging from 0.775 to 1.29. According to these margins, triple therapy based on any NOAC proved to be superior to dual therapy alone, but at the same time demonstrated its equivalence with dual therapy. The results for apixaban-based triple therapy were inconclusive (not superior, not not-inferior, not equivalent and, of course, not inferior to the controls). Those for rivaroxaban-based triple therapy showed that this combination treatment was superior to dual therapy alone and failed to meet the criterion of equivalence. In the comparison between rivaroxaban-based triple therapy and ticagrelor + aspirin, the RR was 1 and its 95% CI remained within a post-hoc margin of ± 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Even if one considers the most effective NOAC in combination with clopidogrel + ticagrelor, this triple therapy is not more effective than ticagrelor + aspirin. On the other hand, the increased risk of bleeding with triple regimens is well demonstrated. We therefore conclude that these triple regimens did not play any important roles in the patients experiencing an acute coronary syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4109037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Safnek
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41090372014-09-01 New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments? Messori, Andrea Fadda, Valeria Gatto, Roberta Maratea, Dario Trippoli, Sabrina Int Cardiovasc Res J Brief Report BACKGROUND: After an acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin is still a standard of care, but several new approaches have been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The present study re-examined the studies published thus far on this topic to evaluate the effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy in comparison to some of these new approaches (mainly, ticagrelor + aspirin and dual therapy plus a new oral anticoagulant [NOAC]; i.e., “triple therapy”). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical material was directly derived from that reported in recent meta-analyses. Our re-analysis relied on standard equivalence methods in which interpretation is based on Relative Risks (RRs) along with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). The equivalence margins employed in our statistical testing were directly derived from those reported in randomized studies. RESULTS: The equivalence margins were initially set at RR ranging from 0.775 to 1.29. According to these margins, triple therapy based on any NOAC proved to be superior to dual therapy alone, but at the same time demonstrated its equivalence with dual therapy. The results for apixaban-based triple therapy were inconclusive (not superior, not not-inferior, not equivalent and, of course, not inferior to the controls). Those for rivaroxaban-based triple therapy showed that this combination treatment was superior to dual therapy alone and failed to meet the criterion of equivalence. In the comparison between rivaroxaban-based triple therapy and ticagrelor + aspirin, the RR was 1 and its 95% CI remained within a post-hoc margin of ± 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Even if one considers the most effective NOAC in combination with clopidogrel + ticagrelor, this triple therapy is not more effective than ticagrelor + aspirin. On the other hand, the increased risk of bleeding with triple regimens is well demonstrated. We therefore conclude that these triple regimens did not play any important roles in the patients experiencing an acute coronary syndrome. Safnek 2014-09-01 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4109037/ /pubmed/25177676 Text en Copyright © 2014, International Cardivascular Research Journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Messori, Andrea
Fadda, Valeria
Gatto, Roberta
Maratea, Dario
Trippoli, Sabrina
New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title_full New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title_fullStr New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title_full_unstemmed New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title_short New Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is There Any Advantage Over Existing Treatments?
title_sort new oral anticoagulants in acute coronary syndrome: is there any advantage over existing treatments?
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177676
work_keys_str_mv AT messoriandrea neworalanticoagulantsinacutecoronarysyndromeisthereanyadvantageoverexistingtreatments
AT faddavaleria neworalanticoagulantsinacutecoronarysyndromeisthereanyadvantageoverexistingtreatments
AT gattoroberta neworalanticoagulantsinacutecoronarysyndromeisthereanyadvantageoverexistingtreatments
AT marateadario neworalanticoagulantsinacutecoronarysyndromeisthereanyadvantageoverexistingtreatments
AT trippolisabrina neworalanticoagulantsinacutecoronarysyndromeisthereanyadvantageoverexistingtreatments