Cargando…

Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Ming-Hung, Wang, Ling-Wei, Lu, Hsueh-Ju, Chu, Pen-Yuan, Tai, Shyh-Kuan, Lee, Tsung-Lun, Chen, Ming-Huang, Yang, Muh-Hwa, Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25110705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341
_version_ 1782327852456214528
author Hu, Ming-Hung
Wang, Ling-Wei
Lu, Hsueh-Ju
Chu, Pen-Yuan
Tai, Shyh-Kuan
Lee, Tsung-Lun
Chen, Ming-Huang
Yang, Muh-Hwa
Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin
author_facet Hu, Ming-Hung
Wang, Ling-Wei
Lu, Hsueh-Ju
Chu, Pen-Yuan
Tai, Shyh-Kuan
Lee, Tsung-Lun
Chen, Ming-Huang
Yang, Muh-Hwa
Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin
author_sort Hu, Ming-Hung
collection PubMed
description Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation therapy (BioRT). Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 170 LAHNC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2012: 116 received CCRT and 54 received BioRT. Results. Complete response rates were similar in the SD-CCRT and BioRT groups (63.8% versus 59.3%; P = 0.807), and locoregional relapse rates were 18.1% and 13.0%, respectively (P = 0.400). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 65.8% in the SD-CCRT group and 65.5% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.647). The 3-year overall survival rate was 78.5% in the SD-CCRT group and 70.9% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.879). Hematologic side effects were significantly more frequent in the SD-CCRT than in the BioRT group. Mucositis frequency was similar. Conclusions. Primary SD-CCRT and BioRT both showed good clinical response and survival. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent, but tolerable, in the SD-CCRT group. Both groups showed good compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4109223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41092232014-08-10 Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Hu, Ming-Hung Wang, Ling-Wei Lu, Hsueh-Ju Chu, Pen-Yuan Tai, Shyh-Kuan Lee, Tsung-Lun Chen, Ming-Huang Yang, Muh-Hwa Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation therapy (BioRT). Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 170 LAHNC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2012: 116 received CCRT and 54 received BioRT. Results. Complete response rates were similar in the SD-CCRT and BioRT groups (63.8% versus 59.3%; P = 0.807), and locoregional relapse rates were 18.1% and 13.0%, respectively (P = 0.400). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 65.8% in the SD-CCRT group and 65.5% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.647). The 3-year overall survival rate was 78.5% in the SD-CCRT group and 70.9% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.879). Hematologic side effects were significantly more frequent in the SD-CCRT than in the BioRT group. Mucositis frequency was similar. Conclusions. Primary SD-CCRT and BioRT both showed good clinical response and survival. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent, but tolerable, in the SD-CCRT group. Both groups showed good compliance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4109223/ /pubmed/25110705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ming-Hung Hu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hu, Ming-Hung
Wang, Ling-Wei
Lu, Hsueh-Ju
Chu, Pen-Yuan
Tai, Shyh-Kuan
Lee, Tsung-Lun
Chen, Ming-Huang
Yang, Muh-Hwa
Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin
Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title_full Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title_fullStr Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title_short Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
title_sort cisplatin-based chemotherapy versus cetuximab in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer treatment
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25110705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341
work_keys_str_mv AT huminghung cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT wanglingwei cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT luhsuehju cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT chupenyuan cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT taishyhkuan cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT leetsunglun cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT chenminghuang cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT yangmuhhwa cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment
AT changpetermuhsin cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment