Cargando…
Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation thera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25110705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341 |
_version_ | 1782327852456214528 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Ming-Hung Wang, Ling-Wei Lu, Hsueh-Ju Chu, Pen-Yuan Tai, Shyh-Kuan Lee, Tsung-Lun Chen, Ming-Huang Yang, Muh-Hwa Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin |
author_facet | Hu, Ming-Hung Wang, Ling-Wei Lu, Hsueh-Ju Chu, Pen-Yuan Tai, Shyh-Kuan Lee, Tsung-Lun Chen, Ming-Huang Yang, Muh-Hwa Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin |
author_sort | Hu, Ming-Hung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation therapy (BioRT). Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 170 LAHNC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2012: 116 received CCRT and 54 received BioRT. Results. Complete response rates were similar in the SD-CCRT and BioRT groups (63.8% versus 59.3%; P = 0.807), and locoregional relapse rates were 18.1% and 13.0%, respectively (P = 0.400). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 65.8% in the SD-CCRT group and 65.5% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.647). The 3-year overall survival rate was 78.5% in the SD-CCRT group and 70.9% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.879). Hematologic side effects were significantly more frequent in the SD-CCRT than in the BioRT group. Mucositis frequency was similar. Conclusions. Primary SD-CCRT and BioRT both showed good clinical response and survival. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent, but tolerable, in the SD-CCRT group. Both groups showed good compliance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4109223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41092232014-08-10 Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Hu, Ming-Hung Wang, Ling-Wei Lu, Hsueh-Ju Chu, Pen-Yuan Tai, Shyh-Kuan Lee, Tsung-Lun Chen, Ming-Huang Yang, Muh-Hwa Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background and Purpose. This study aimed to analyze survival, clinical responses, compliance, and adverse effects in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) patients treated with split-dose cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation therapy (SD-CCRT) or cetuximab with concurrent radiation therapy (BioRT). Materials and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 170 LAHNC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2012: 116 received CCRT and 54 received BioRT. Results. Complete response rates were similar in the SD-CCRT and BioRT groups (63.8% versus 59.3%; P = 0.807), and locoregional relapse rates were 18.1% and 13.0%, respectively (P = 0.400). The 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 65.8% in the SD-CCRT group and 65.5% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.647). The 3-year overall survival rate was 78.5% in the SD-CCRT group and 70.9% in the BioRT group, respectively (P = 0.879). Hematologic side effects were significantly more frequent in the SD-CCRT than in the BioRT group. Mucositis frequency was similar. Conclusions. Primary SD-CCRT and BioRT both showed good clinical response and survival. Hematologic toxicities were more frequent, but tolerable, in the SD-CCRT group. Both groups showed good compliance. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4109223/ /pubmed/25110705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ming-Hung Hu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hu, Ming-Hung Wang, Ling-Wei Lu, Hsueh-Ju Chu, Pen-Yuan Tai, Shyh-Kuan Lee, Tsung-Lun Chen, Ming-Huang Yang, Muh-Hwa Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title | Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title_full | Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title_fullStr | Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title_short | Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy versus Cetuximab in Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Treatment |
title_sort | cisplatin-based chemotherapy versus cetuximab in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer treatment |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25110705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/904341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huminghung cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT wanglingwei cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT luhsuehju cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT chupenyuan cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT taishyhkuan cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT leetsunglun cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT chenminghuang cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT yangmuhhwa cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment AT changpetermuhsin cisplatinbasedchemotherapyversuscetuximabinconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertreatment |