Cargando…

A Progress Report of the IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests

BACKGROUND: The IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests aims at equivalence of laboratory test results for free thyroxine (FT4) and thyrotropin (TSH). OBJECTIVES: This report describes the phase III method comparison study with clinical samples representing a broad spectrum of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thienpont, Linda M., Van Uytfanghe, Katleen, Van Houcke, Sofie, Das, Barnali, Faix, James D., MacKenzie, Finlay, Quinn, Frank A., Rottmann, Michael, Van den Bruel, Annick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000358270
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests aims at equivalence of laboratory test results for free thyroxine (FT4) and thyrotropin (TSH). OBJECTIVES: This report describes the phase III method comparison study with clinical samples representing a broad spectrum of thyroid disease. The objective was to expand the feasibility work and explore the impact of standardization/harmonization in the clinically relevant concentration range. METHODS: Two sets of serum samples (74 for FT4, 94 for TSH) were obtained in a clinical setting. Eight manufacturers participated in the study (with 13 FT4 and 14 TSH assays). Targets for FT4 were set by the international conventional reference measurement procedure of the IFCC; those for TSH were based on the all-procedure trimmed mean. The manufacturers recalibrated their assays against these targets. RESULTS: All FT4 assays were negatively biased in the mid- to high concentration range, with a maximum interassay discrepancy of approximately 30%. However, in the low range, the maximum deviation was approximately 90%. For TSH, interassay comparability was reasonable in the mid-concentration range, but worse in the pathophysiological ranges. Recalibration was able to eliminate the interassay differences, so that the remaining dispersion of the data was nearly entirely due to within-assay random error components. The impact of recalibration on the numerical results was particularly high for FT4. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization and harmonization of FT4 and TSH measurements is feasible from a technical point of view. Because of the impact on the numerical values, the implementation needs careful preparation with the stakeholders.