Cargando…

Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?

This study describes the characteristics of extramural and transmural telemonitoring projects on chronic heart failure in Belgium. It describes to what extent these telemonitoring projects coincide with the Chronic Care Model of Wagner. BACKGROUND: The Chronic Care Model describes essential componen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willemse, Evi, Adriaenssens, Jef, Dilles, Tinne, Remmen, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Igitur publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114664
_version_ 1782327887075999744
author Willemse, Evi
Adriaenssens, Jef
Dilles, Tinne
Remmen, Roy
author_facet Willemse, Evi
Adriaenssens, Jef
Dilles, Tinne
Remmen, Roy
author_sort Willemse, Evi
collection PubMed
description This study describes the characteristics of extramural and transmural telemonitoring projects on chronic heart failure in Belgium. It describes to what extent these telemonitoring projects coincide with the Chronic Care Model of Wagner. BACKGROUND: The Chronic Care Model describes essential components for high-quality health care. Telemonitoring can be used to optimise home care for chronic heart failure. It provides a potential prospective to change the current care organisation. METHODS: This qualitative study describes seven non-invasive home-care telemonitoring projects in patients with heart failure in Belgium. A qualitative design, including interviews and literature review, was used to describe the correspondence of these home-care telemonitoring projects with the dimensions of the Chronic Care Model. RESULTS: The projects were situated in primary and secondary health care. Their primary goal was to reduce the number of readmissions for chronic heart failure. None of these projects succeeded in a final implementation of telemonitoring in home care after the pilot phase. Not all the projects were initiated to accomplish all of the dimensions of the Chronic Care Model. A central role for the patient was sparse. CONCLUSION: Limited financial resources hampered continuation after the pilot phase. Cooperation and coordination in telemonitoring appears to be major barriers but are, within primary care as well as between the lines of care, important links in follow-up. This discrepancy can be prohibitive for deployment of good chronic care. Chronic Care Model is recommended as basis for future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4109584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Igitur publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41095842014-08-11 Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model? Willemse, Evi Adriaenssens, Jef Dilles, Tinne Remmen, Roy Int J Integr Care Research and Theory This study describes the characteristics of extramural and transmural telemonitoring projects on chronic heart failure in Belgium. It describes to what extent these telemonitoring projects coincide with the Chronic Care Model of Wagner. BACKGROUND: The Chronic Care Model describes essential components for high-quality health care. Telemonitoring can be used to optimise home care for chronic heart failure. It provides a potential prospective to change the current care organisation. METHODS: This qualitative study describes seven non-invasive home-care telemonitoring projects in patients with heart failure in Belgium. A qualitative design, including interviews and literature review, was used to describe the correspondence of these home-care telemonitoring projects with the dimensions of the Chronic Care Model. RESULTS: The projects were situated in primary and secondary health care. Their primary goal was to reduce the number of readmissions for chronic heart failure. None of these projects succeeded in a final implementation of telemonitoring in home care after the pilot phase. Not all the projects were initiated to accomplish all of the dimensions of the Chronic Care Model. A central role for the patient was sparse. CONCLUSION: Limited financial resources hampered continuation after the pilot phase. Cooperation and coordination in telemonitoring appears to be major barriers but are, within primary care as well as between the lines of care, important links in follow-up. This discrepancy can be prohibitive for deployment of good chronic care. Chronic Care Model is recommended as basis for future. Igitur publishing 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4109584/ /pubmed/25114664 Text en Copyright 2014, Authors retain the copyright of their article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0) Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Research and Theory
Willemse, Evi
Adriaenssens, Jef
Dilles, Tinne
Remmen, Roy
Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title_full Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title_fullStr Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title_full_unstemmed Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title_short Do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the Chronic Care Model?
title_sort do telemonitoring projects of heart failure fit the chronic care model?
topic Research and Theory
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114664
work_keys_str_mv AT willemseevi dotelemonitoringprojectsofheartfailurefitthechroniccaremodel
AT adriaenssensjef dotelemonitoringprojectsofheartfailurefitthechroniccaremodel
AT dillestinne dotelemonitoringprojectsofheartfailurefitthechroniccaremodel
AT remmenroy dotelemonitoringprojectsofheartfailurefitthechroniccaremodel