Cargando…

Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND: Preventive measures are essential to limit the spread of new viruses; their uptake is key to their success. However, the vaccination uptake in pandemic outbreaks is often low. We aim to elicit how disease and vaccination characteristics determine preferences of the general public for new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Determann, Domino, Korfage, Ida J., Lambooij, Mattijs S., Bliemer, Michiel, Richardus, Jan Hendrik, Steyerberg, Ewout W., de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102505
_version_ 1782327931546107904
author Determann, Domino
Korfage, Ida J.
Lambooij, Mattijs S.
Bliemer, Michiel
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
author_facet Determann, Domino
Korfage, Ida J.
Lambooij, Mattijs S.
Bliemer, Michiel
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
author_sort Determann, Domino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preventive measures are essential to limit the spread of new viruses; their uptake is key to their success. However, the vaccination uptake in pandemic outbreaks is often low. We aim to elicit how disease and vaccination characteristics determine preferences of the general public for new pandemic vaccinations. METHODS: In an internet-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) a representative sample of 536 participants (49% participation rate) from the Dutch population was asked for their preference for vaccination programs in hypothetical communicable disease outbreaks. We used scenarios based on two disease characteristics (susceptibility to and severity of the disease) and five vaccination program characteristics (effectiveness, safety, advice regarding vaccination, media attention, and out-of-pocket costs). The DCE design was based on a literature review, expert interviews and focus group discussions. A panel latent class logit model was used to estimate which trade-offs individuals were willing to make. RESULTS: All above mentioned characteristics proved to influence respondents’ preferences for vaccination. Preference heterogeneity was substantial. Females who stated that they were never in favor of vaccination made different trade-offs than males who stated that they were (possibly) willing to get vaccinated. As expected, respondents preferred and were willing to pay more for more effective vaccines, especially if the outbreak was more serious (€6–€39 for a 10% more effective vaccine). Changes in effectiveness, out-of-pocket costs and in the body that advises the vaccine all substantially influenced the predicted uptake. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that various disease and vaccination program characteristics influence respondents’ preferences for pandemic vaccination programs. Agencies responsible for preventive measures during pandemics can use the knowledge that out-of-pocket costs and the way advice is given affect vaccination uptake to improve their plans for future pandemic outbreaks. The preference heterogeneity shows that information regarding vaccination needs to be targeted differently depending on gender and willingness to get vaccinated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4109921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41099212014-07-29 Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment Determann, Domino Korfage, Ida J. Lambooij, Mattijs S. Bliemer, Michiel Richardus, Jan Hendrik Steyerberg, Ewout W. de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Preventive measures are essential to limit the spread of new viruses; their uptake is key to their success. However, the vaccination uptake in pandemic outbreaks is often low. We aim to elicit how disease and vaccination characteristics determine preferences of the general public for new pandemic vaccinations. METHODS: In an internet-based discrete choice experiment (DCE) a representative sample of 536 participants (49% participation rate) from the Dutch population was asked for their preference for vaccination programs in hypothetical communicable disease outbreaks. We used scenarios based on two disease characteristics (susceptibility to and severity of the disease) and five vaccination program characteristics (effectiveness, safety, advice regarding vaccination, media attention, and out-of-pocket costs). The DCE design was based on a literature review, expert interviews and focus group discussions. A panel latent class logit model was used to estimate which trade-offs individuals were willing to make. RESULTS: All above mentioned characteristics proved to influence respondents’ preferences for vaccination. Preference heterogeneity was substantial. Females who stated that they were never in favor of vaccination made different trade-offs than males who stated that they were (possibly) willing to get vaccinated. As expected, respondents preferred and were willing to pay more for more effective vaccines, especially if the outbreak was more serious (€6–€39 for a 10% more effective vaccine). Changes in effectiveness, out-of-pocket costs and in the body that advises the vaccine all substantially influenced the predicted uptake. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that various disease and vaccination program characteristics influence respondents’ preferences for pandemic vaccination programs. Agencies responsible for preventive measures during pandemics can use the knowledge that out-of-pocket costs and the way advice is given affect vaccination uptake to improve their plans for future pandemic outbreaks. The preference heterogeneity shows that information regarding vaccination needs to be targeted differently depending on gender and willingness to get vaccinated. Public Library of Science 2014-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4109921/ /pubmed/25057914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102505 Text en © 2014 Determann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Determann, Domino
Korfage, Ida J.
Lambooij, Mattijs S.
Bliemer, Michiel
Richardus, Jan Hendrik
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_fullStr Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_short Acceptance of Vaccinations in Pandemic Outbreaks: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_sort acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102505
work_keys_str_mv AT determanndomino acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT korfageidaj acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT lambooijmattijss acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT bliemermichiel acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT richardusjanhendrik acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT steyerbergewoutw acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT debekkergrobestherw acceptanceofvaccinationsinpandemicoutbreaksadiscretechoiceexperiment