Cargando…

Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saeb, Amr TM, David, Satish Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097377
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347
_version_ 1782328001800699904
author Saeb, Amr TM
David, Satish Kumar
author_facet Saeb, Amr TM
David, Satish Kumar
author_sort Saeb, Amr TM
collection PubMed
description Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling method (TSM). The study was conducted at the Mohican Hills golf course at the state of Ohio where the EPN H. bacteriophora has been monitored for 18 years. The nematode population occupies an area of approximately 3700 m(2) with density range from 0.25-2 per gram soil. Genetic diversity of EPN was studied by molecular sampling method (MSM) and traditional sampling method (TSM) using the mitochondrial gene pcox1. The MSM picked 88% in compared to TSM with only 30% of sequenced cox 1 gene. All studied genetic polymorphism measures (sequence and haplotype) showed high levels of genetic diversity of MSM over TSM. MSM minimizes the chance of mitochondrial genes amplification from non target organisms (insect or other contaminating microorganisms). Moreover, it allows the sampling of more individuals with a reliable and credible representative sample size. Thus, we show that MSM supersedes TSM in labour intensity, time consumption and requirement of no special experience and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4110425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41104252014-08-05 Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods Saeb, Amr TM David, Satish Kumar Bioinformation Hypothesis Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling method (TSM). The study was conducted at the Mohican Hills golf course at the state of Ohio where the EPN H. bacteriophora has been monitored for 18 years. The nematode population occupies an area of approximately 3700 m(2) with density range from 0.25-2 per gram soil. Genetic diversity of EPN was studied by molecular sampling method (MSM) and traditional sampling method (TSM) using the mitochondrial gene pcox1. The MSM picked 88% in compared to TSM with only 30% of sequenced cox 1 gene. All studied genetic polymorphism measures (sequence and haplotype) showed high levels of genetic diversity of MSM over TSM. MSM minimizes the chance of mitochondrial genes amplification from non target organisms (insect or other contaminating microorganisms). Moreover, it allows the sampling of more individuals with a reliable and credible representative sample size. Thus, we show that MSM supersedes TSM in labour intensity, time consumption and requirement of no special experience and efficiency. Biomedical Informatics 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4110425/ /pubmed/25097377 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347 Text en © 2014 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Saeb, Amr TM
David, Satish Kumar
Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title_full Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title_fullStr Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title_short Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
title_sort comparative estimation of genetic diversity in population studies using molecular sampling and traditional sampling methods
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097377
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347
work_keys_str_mv AT saebamrtm comparativeestimationofgeneticdiversityinpopulationstudiesusingmolecularsamplingandtraditionalsamplingmethods
AT davidsatishkumar comparativeestimationofgeneticdiversityinpopulationstudiesusingmolecularsamplingandtraditionalsamplingmethods