Cargando…
Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Biomedical Informatics
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097377 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347 |
_version_ | 1782328001800699904 |
---|---|
author | Saeb, Amr TM David, Satish Kumar |
author_facet | Saeb, Amr TM David, Satish Kumar |
author_sort | Saeb, Amr TM |
collection | PubMed |
description | Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling method (TSM). The study was conducted at the Mohican Hills golf course at the state of Ohio where the EPN H. bacteriophora has been monitored for 18 years. The nematode population occupies an area of approximately 3700 m(2) with density range from 0.25-2 per gram soil. Genetic diversity of EPN was studied by molecular sampling method (MSM) and traditional sampling method (TSM) using the mitochondrial gene pcox1. The MSM picked 88% in compared to TSM with only 30% of sequenced cox 1 gene. All studied genetic polymorphism measures (sequence and haplotype) showed high levels of genetic diversity of MSM over TSM. MSM minimizes the chance of mitochondrial genes amplification from non target organisms (insect or other contaminating microorganisms). Moreover, it allows the sampling of more individuals with a reliable and credible representative sample size. Thus, we show that MSM supersedes TSM in labour intensity, time consumption and requirement of no special experience and efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4110425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Biomedical Informatics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41104252014-08-05 Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods Saeb, Amr TM David, Satish Kumar Bioinformation Hypothesis Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are efficient biological pest control agents. Population genetics studies on EPN are seldom known. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the significance of molecular sampling method (MSM) for accuracy, time needed, and cost effectiveness over traditional sampling method (TSM). The study was conducted at the Mohican Hills golf course at the state of Ohio where the EPN H. bacteriophora has been monitored for 18 years. The nematode population occupies an area of approximately 3700 m(2) with density range from 0.25-2 per gram soil. Genetic diversity of EPN was studied by molecular sampling method (MSM) and traditional sampling method (TSM) using the mitochondrial gene pcox1. The MSM picked 88% in compared to TSM with only 30% of sequenced cox 1 gene. All studied genetic polymorphism measures (sequence and haplotype) showed high levels of genetic diversity of MSM over TSM. MSM minimizes the chance of mitochondrial genes amplification from non target organisms (insect or other contaminating microorganisms). Moreover, it allows the sampling of more individuals with a reliable and credible representative sample size. Thus, we show that MSM supersedes TSM in labour intensity, time consumption and requirement of no special experience and efficiency. Biomedical Informatics 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4110425/ /pubmed/25097377 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347 Text en © 2014 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Hypothesis Saeb, Amr TM David, Satish Kumar Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title | Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title_full | Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title_fullStr | Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title_short | Comparative Estimation of Genetic Diversity in Population Studies using Molecular Sampling and Traditional Sampling Methods |
title_sort | comparative estimation of genetic diversity in population studies using molecular sampling and traditional sampling methods |
topic | Hypothesis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097377 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saebamrtm comparativeestimationofgeneticdiversityinpopulationstudiesusingmolecularsamplingandtraditionalsamplingmethods AT davidsatishkumar comparativeestimationofgeneticdiversityinpopulationstudiesusingmolecularsamplingandtraditionalsamplingmethods |