Cargando…

Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND: Patients with lung or colorectal cancer often present late and have a poor prognosis. Identifying diagnostic indicators to optimally assess the risk of these cancers in primary care would support early identification and timely referral for patients at increased risk. AIM: To obtain cons...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansell, Gemma, Shapley, Mark, van der Windt, Danielle, Sanders, Tom, Little, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681001
_version_ 1782328088546246656
author Mansell, Gemma
Shapley, Mark
van der Windt, Danielle
Sanders, Tom
Little, Paul
author_facet Mansell, Gemma
Shapley, Mark
van der Windt, Danielle
Sanders, Tom
Little, Paul
author_sort Mansell, Gemma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with lung or colorectal cancer often present late and have a poor prognosis. Identifying diagnostic indicators to optimally assess the risk of these cancers in primary care would support early identification and timely referral for patients at increased risk. AIM: To obtain consensus regarding potential diagnostic indicators that are important for assessing the risk of lung or colorectal cancer in primary care consulters presenting with lung or abdominal symptoms. DESIGN AND SETTING: A Delphi study was conducted with 28 participants from primary and secondary care and academic settings in the UK and Europe. METHOD: Indicators were obtained from systematic reviews, recent primary studies and consultation with experts prior to the Delphi study being conducted. Over three rounds, participants rated each diagnostic indicator in terms of its importance, ranked them in order of importance, and rated each item as crucial or not crucial to assess during a GP consultation. RESULTS: The final round resulted in 25 items remaining for each type of cancer, including established cancer symptoms such as rectal bleeding for colorectal cancer and haemoptysis for lung cancer, but also less frequently used indicators such as patients’ concerns about cancer. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the items clinicians feel would be most crucial to include in the clinical assessment of primary care patients, a number of which have rarely been noted in the previous literature. Their importance in assessing the risk of lung or colorectal cancer will be tested as part of a large prospective cohort study (CANDID).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4111344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41113442014-08-05 Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study Mansell, Gemma Shapley, Mark van der Windt, Danielle Sanders, Tom Little, Paul Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Patients with lung or colorectal cancer often present late and have a poor prognosis. Identifying diagnostic indicators to optimally assess the risk of these cancers in primary care would support early identification and timely referral for patients at increased risk. AIM: To obtain consensus regarding potential diagnostic indicators that are important for assessing the risk of lung or colorectal cancer in primary care consulters presenting with lung or abdominal symptoms. DESIGN AND SETTING: A Delphi study was conducted with 28 participants from primary and secondary care and academic settings in the UK and Europe. METHOD: Indicators were obtained from systematic reviews, recent primary studies and consultation with experts prior to the Delphi study being conducted. Over three rounds, participants rated each diagnostic indicator in terms of its importance, ranked them in order of importance, and rated each item as crucial or not crucial to assess during a GP consultation. RESULTS: The final round resulted in 25 items remaining for each type of cancer, including established cancer symptoms such as rectal bleeding for colorectal cancer and haemoptysis for lung cancer, but also less frequently used indicators such as patients’ concerns about cancer. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the items clinicians feel would be most crucial to include in the clinical assessment of primary care patients, a number of which have rarely been noted in the previous literature. Their importance in assessing the risk of lung or colorectal cancer will be tested as part of a large prospective cohort study (CANDID). Royal College of General Practitioners 2014-08 2014-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4111344/ /pubmed/25071064 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681001 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Mansell, Gemma
Shapley, Mark
van der Windt, Danielle
Sanders, Tom
Little, Paul
Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title_full Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title_short Critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a Delphi study
title_sort critical items for assessing risk of lung and colorectal cancer in primary care: a delphi study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071064
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14X681001
work_keys_str_mv AT mansellgemma criticalitemsforassessingriskoflungandcolorectalcancerinprimarycareadelphistudy
AT shapleymark criticalitemsforassessingriskoflungandcolorectalcancerinprimarycareadelphistudy
AT vanderwindtdanielle criticalitemsforassessingriskoflungandcolorectalcancerinprimarycareadelphistudy
AT sanderstom criticalitemsforassessingriskoflungandcolorectalcancerinprimarycareadelphistudy
AT littlepaul criticalitemsforassessingriskoflungandcolorectalcancerinprimarycareadelphistudy