Cargando…
Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7 |
_version_ | 1782328136147402752 |
---|---|
author | Zolzaya, Baljinnyam Selenge, Tsend Narangarav, Tsegeen Gantsetseg, Dorj Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge Zinsstag, Jakob Schelling, Esther |
author_facet | Zolzaya, Baljinnyam Selenge, Tsend Narangarav, Tsegeen Gantsetseg, Dorj Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge Zinsstag, Jakob Schelling, Esther |
author_sort | Zolzaya, Baljinnyam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences of humans and livestock in two provinces in view of their comparison with officially reported data. A representative cross-sectional study using cluster sampling proportional to size in humans, sheep, goats, cattle, yaks, horses, camels and dogs was undertaken to assess the apparent seroprevalence in humans and animals. A total of 8054 livestock and dog sera and 574 human sera were collected in Sukhbaatar and Zavkhan provinces. Human and animal sera were tested with the Rose Bengal and ELISA tests. The overall apparent seroprevalence of brucellosis was 27.3% in humans (95% CI 23.7–31.2%), 6.2% (95% CI 5.5–7.1%) in sheep, 5.2% (95% CI 4.4–5.9%) in goats, 16.0% (95% CI 13.7–18.7%) in cattle, 2.5% (95% CI 0.8–7.6%) in camels, 8.3 (95% CI 6.0–11.6%) in horses and 36.4% (95% CI 26.3–48.0%) in dogs. More women than men were seropositive (OR = 1.7; P < 0.0014). Human seroprevalence was not associated with small ruminant and cattle seroprevalence at the nomadic camp (hot ail) level. Annual incidence of clinical brucellosis, inferred from the seroprevalence using a catalytic model, was by a factor of 4.6 (1307/280) in Sukhbaatar and by a factor of 59 (1188/20) in Zavkhan. This represents a 15-fold underreporting of human brucellosis in Mongolia. The lack of access to brucellosis diagnostic testing at the village level hinders rural people from receiving appropriate treatment. In conclusion, this study confirms the high seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis in Mongolia. Stringent monitoring and quality control of operational management of a nationwide mass vaccination of small and large ruminants is warranted to assure its effectiveness. More research is needed to understand the complex animal–human interface of brucellosis transmission at different scales from farm to provincial level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4111879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41118792014-07-30 Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces Zolzaya, Baljinnyam Selenge, Tsend Narangarav, Tsegeen Gantsetseg, Dorj Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge Zinsstag, Jakob Schelling, Esther Ecohealth Original Contribution Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences of humans and livestock in two provinces in view of their comparison with officially reported data. A representative cross-sectional study using cluster sampling proportional to size in humans, sheep, goats, cattle, yaks, horses, camels and dogs was undertaken to assess the apparent seroprevalence in humans and animals. A total of 8054 livestock and dog sera and 574 human sera were collected in Sukhbaatar and Zavkhan provinces. Human and animal sera were tested with the Rose Bengal and ELISA tests. The overall apparent seroprevalence of brucellosis was 27.3% in humans (95% CI 23.7–31.2%), 6.2% (95% CI 5.5–7.1%) in sheep, 5.2% (95% CI 4.4–5.9%) in goats, 16.0% (95% CI 13.7–18.7%) in cattle, 2.5% (95% CI 0.8–7.6%) in camels, 8.3 (95% CI 6.0–11.6%) in horses and 36.4% (95% CI 26.3–48.0%) in dogs. More women than men were seropositive (OR = 1.7; P < 0.0014). Human seroprevalence was not associated with small ruminant and cattle seroprevalence at the nomadic camp (hot ail) level. Annual incidence of clinical brucellosis, inferred from the seroprevalence using a catalytic model, was by a factor of 4.6 (1307/280) in Sukhbaatar and by a factor of 59 (1188/20) in Zavkhan. This represents a 15-fold underreporting of human brucellosis in Mongolia. The lack of access to brucellosis diagnostic testing at the village level hinders rural people from receiving appropriate treatment. In conclusion, this study confirms the high seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis in Mongolia. Stringent monitoring and quality control of operational management of a nationwide mass vaccination of small and large ruminants is warranted to assure its effectiveness. More research is needed to understand the complex animal–human interface of brucellosis transmission at different scales from farm to provincial level. Springer US 2014-07-11 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4111879/ /pubmed/25012215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Contribution Zolzaya, Baljinnyam Selenge, Tsend Narangarav, Tsegeen Gantsetseg, Dorj Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge Zinsstag, Jakob Schelling, Esther Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title | Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title_full | Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title_fullStr | Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title_full_unstemmed | Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title_short | Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces |
title_sort | representative seroprevalences of human and livestock brucellosis in two mongolian provinces |
topic | Original Contribution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zolzayabaljinnyam representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT selengetsend representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT narangaravtsegeen representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT gantsetsegdorj representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT erdenechimegdashzevge representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT zinsstagjakob representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces AT schellingesther representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces |