Cargando…

Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces

Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zolzaya, Baljinnyam, Selenge, Tsend, Narangarav, Tsegeen, Gantsetseg, Dorj, Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge, Zinsstag, Jakob, Schelling, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7
_version_ 1782328136147402752
author Zolzaya, Baljinnyam
Selenge, Tsend
Narangarav, Tsegeen
Gantsetseg, Dorj
Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge
Zinsstag, Jakob
Schelling, Esther
author_facet Zolzaya, Baljinnyam
Selenge, Tsend
Narangarav, Tsegeen
Gantsetseg, Dorj
Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge
Zinsstag, Jakob
Schelling, Esther
author_sort Zolzaya, Baljinnyam
collection PubMed
description Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences of humans and livestock in two provinces in view of their comparison with officially reported data. A representative cross-sectional study using cluster sampling proportional to size in humans, sheep, goats, cattle, yaks, horses, camels and dogs was undertaken to assess the apparent seroprevalence in humans and animals. A total of 8054 livestock and dog sera and 574 human sera were collected in Sukhbaatar and Zavkhan provinces. Human and animal sera were tested with the Rose Bengal and ELISA tests. The overall apparent seroprevalence of brucellosis was 27.3% in humans (95% CI 23.7–31.2%), 6.2% (95% CI 5.5–7.1%) in sheep, 5.2% (95% CI 4.4–5.9%) in goats, 16.0% (95% CI 13.7–18.7%) in cattle, 2.5% (95% CI 0.8–7.6%) in camels, 8.3 (95% CI 6.0–11.6%) in horses and 36.4% (95% CI 26.3–48.0%) in dogs. More women than men were seropositive (OR = 1.7; P < 0.0014). Human seroprevalence was not associated with small ruminant and cattle seroprevalence at the nomadic camp (hot ail) level. Annual incidence of clinical brucellosis, inferred from the seroprevalence using a catalytic model, was by a factor of 4.6 (1307/280) in Sukhbaatar and by a factor of 59 (1188/20) in Zavkhan. This represents a 15-fold underreporting of human brucellosis in Mongolia. The lack of access to brucellosis diagnostic testing at the village level hinders rural people from receiving appropriate treatment. In conclusion, this study confirms the high seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis in Mongolia. Stringent monitoring and quality control of operational management of a nationwide mass vaccination of small and large ruminants is warranted to assure its effectiveness. More research is needed to understand the complex animal–human interface of brucellosis transmission at different scales from farm to provincial level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4111879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41118792014-07-30 Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces Zolzaya, Baljinnyam Selenge, Tsend Narangarav, Tsegeen Gantsetseg, Dorj Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge Zinsstag, Jakob Schelling, Esther Ecohealth Original Contribution Mongolia implemented a brucellosis livestock mass vaccination campaign from 2000 to 2009. However, the number of human cases did not decline since 2004 and the current epidemiological situation in Mongolia was uncertain. The objective of this study was to estimate the representative seroprevalences of humans and livestock in two provinces in view of their comparison with officially reported data. A representative cross-sectional study using cluster sampling proportional to size in humans, sheep, goats, cattle, yaks, horses, camels and dogs was undertaken to assess the apparent seroprevalence in humans and animals. A total of 8054 livestock and dog sera and 574 human sera were collected in Sukhbaatar and Zavkhan provinces. Human and animal sera were tested with the Rose Bengal and ELISA tests. The overall apparent seroprevalence of brucellosis was 27.3% in humans (95% CI 23.7–31.2%), 6.2% (95% CI 5.5–7.1%) in sheep, 5.2% (95% CI 4.4–5.9%) in goats, 16.0% (95% CI 13.7–18.7%) in cattle, 2.5% (95% CI 0.8–7.6%) in camels, 8.3 (95% CI 6.0–11.6%) in horses and 36.4% (95% CI 26.3–48.0%) in dogs. More women than men were seropositive (OR = 1.7; P < 0.0014). Human seroprevalence was not associated with small ruminant and cattle seroprevalence at the nomadic camp (hot ail) level. Annual incidence of clinical brucellosis, inferred from the seroprevalence using a catalytic model, was by a factor of 4.6 (1307/280) in Sukhbaatar and by a factor of 59 (1188/20) in Zavkhan. This represents a 15-fold underreporting of human brucellosis in Mongolia. The lack of access to brucellosis diagnostic testing at the village level hinders rural people from receiving appropriate treatment. In conclusion, this study confirms the high seroprevalence of human and livestock brucellosis in Mongolia. Stringent monitoring and quality control of operational management of a nationwide mass vaccination of small and large ruminants is warranted to assure its effectiveness. More research is needed to understand the complex animal–human interface of brucellosis transmission at different scales from farm to provincial level. Springer US 2014-07-11 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4111879/ /pubmed/25012215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Zolzaya, Baljinnyam
Selenge, Tsend
Narangarav, Tsegeen
Gantsetseg, Dorj
Erdenechimeg, Dashzevge
Zinsstag, Jakob
Schelling, Esther
Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title_full Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title_fullStr Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title_full_unstemmed Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title_short Representative Seroprevalences of Human and Livestock Brucellosis in Two Mongolian Provinces
title_sort representative seroprevalences of human and livestock brucellosis in two mongolian provinces
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10393-014-0962-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zolzayabaljinnyam representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT selengetsend representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT narangaravtsegeen representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT gantsetsegdorj representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT erdenechimegdashzevge representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT zinsstagjakob representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces
AT schellingesther representativeseroprevalencesofhumanandlivestockbrucellosisintwomongolianprovinces