Cargando…

National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease

Study Design Retrospective population-based observational study. Objective To assess the growth of cervical spine surgery performed in an outpatient setting. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using the United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient and Ambulat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baird, Evan O., Egorova, Natalia N., McAnany, Steven J., Qureshi, Sheeraz A., Hecht, Andrew C., Cho, Samuel K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25083354
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0034-1376917
_version_ 1782328146183323648
author Baird, Evan O.
Egorova, Natalia N.
McAnany, Steven J.
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
Hecht, Andrew C.
Cho, Samuel K.
author_facet Baird, Evan O.
Egorova, Natalia N.
McAnany, Steven J.
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
Hecht, Andrew C.
Cho, Samuel K.
author_sort Baird, Evan O.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Retrospective population-based observational study. Objective To assess the growth of cervical spine surgery performed in an outpatient setting. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using the United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Databases for California, New York, Florida, and Maryland from 2005 to 2009. Current Procedural Terminology, fourth revision (CPT-4) and International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify operations for degenerative cervical spine diseases in adults (age > 20 years). Disposition and complication rates were examined. Results There was an increase in cervical spine surgeries performed in an ambulatory setting during the study period. Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion accounted for 68% of outpatient procedures; posterior decompression made up 21%. Younger patients predominantly underwent anterior fusion procedures, and patients in the eighth and ninth decades of life had more posterior decompressions. Charlson comorbidity index and complication rates were substantially lower for ambulatory cases when compared with inpatients. The majority (>99%) of patients were discharged home following ambulatory surgery. Conclusions Recently, the number of cervical spine surgeries has increased in general, and more of these procedures are being performed in an ambulatory setting. The majority (>99%) of patients are discharged home but the nature of analyzing administrative data limits accurate assessment of postoperative complications and thus patient safety. This increase in outpatient cervical spine surgery necessitates further discussion of its safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4111949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41119492015-03-11 National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease Baird, Evan O. Egorova, Natalia N. McAnany, Steven J. Qureshi, Sheeraz A. Hecht, Andrew C. Cho, Samuel K. Global Spine J Article Study Design Retrospective population-based observational study. Objective To assess the growth of cervical spine surgery performed in an outpatient setting. Methods A retrospective study was conducted using the United States Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Databases for California, New York, Florida, and Maryland from 2005 to 2009. Current Procedural Terminology, fourth revision (CPT-4) and International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify operations for degenerative cervical spine diseases in adults (age > 20 years). Disposition and complication rates were examined. Results There was an increase in cervical spine surgeries performed in an ambulatory setting during the study period. Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion accounted for 68% of outpatient procedures; posterior decompression made up 21%. Younger patients predominantly underwent anterior fusion procedures, and patients in the eighth and ninth decades of life had more posterior decompressions. Charlson comorbidity index and complication rates were substantially lower for ambulatory cases when compared with inpatients. The majority (>99%) of patients were discharged home following ambulatory surgery. Conclusions Recently, the number of cervical spine surgeries has increased in general, and more of these procedures are being performed in an ambulatory setting. The majority (>99%) of patients are discharged home but the nature of analyzing administrative data limits accurate assessment of postoperative complications and thus patient safety. This increase in outpatient cervical spine surgery necessitates further discussion of its safety. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014-07-14 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4111949/ /pubmed/25083354 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0034-1376917 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Baird, Evan O.
Egorova, Natalia N.
McAnany, Steven J.
Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
Hecht, Andrew C.
Cho, Samuel K.
National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title_full National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title_fullStr National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title_full_unstemmed National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title_short National Trends in Outpatient Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease
title_sort national trends in outpatient surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4111949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25083354
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1055/s-0034-1376917
work_keys_str_mv AT bairdevano nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease
AT egorovanatalian nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease
AT mcananystevenj nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease
AT qureshisheeraza nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease
AT hechtandrewc nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease
AT chosamuelk nationaltrendsinoutpatientsurgicaltreatmentofdegenerativecervicalspinedisease