Cargando…
Psychiatric diagnosis: the indispensability of ambivalence
The author analyses how debate over the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has tended to privilege certain conceptions of psychiatric diagnosis over others, as well as to polarise positions regarding psychiatric diagnosis. The article aims to muddy the black a...
Autor principal: | Callard, Felicity |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24515564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2013-101763 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Debating DSM-5: diagnosis and the sociology of critique
por: Pickersgill, Martyn D
Publicado: (2014) -
Future developments in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19
por: Coltart, Cordelia E.M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Shrug Ambivalence and Disagreement; Search Commonalities in Psychiatric Phenomena(**)
por: Singh, Ajai R.
Publicado: (2014) -
Age at Diagnosis and the Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy in Young Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes Metab J 2021;45:46-54)
por: Baek, Jong Ha, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Fibrosis in Autoimmune and Cholestatic Liver Disease
por: Penz-Österreicher, Melitta, et al.
Publicado: (2011)