Cargando…

Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats

OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporoti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Jagt, O. P., van der Linden, J. C., Waarsing, J. H., Verhaar, J. A. N., Weinans, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221
_version_ 1782328209173381120
author van der Jagt, O. P.
van der Linden, J. C.
Waarsing, J. H.
Verhaar, J. A. N.
Weinans, H.
author_facet van der Jagt, O. P.
van der Linden, J. C.
Waarsing, J. H.
Verhaar, J. A. N.
Weinans, H.
author_sort van der Jagt, O. P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporotic and healthy rats. Moreover, we tested the effects of EMF on fracture healing. METHODS: EMF (20 Gauss) was examined in rats (aged 20 weeks), which underwent an ovariectomy (OVX; n = 8) or sham-ovariectomy (sham-OVX; n = 8). As a putative positive control, all rats received bilateral fibular osteotomies to examine the effects on fracture healing. Treatment was applied to one proximal lower leg (three hours a day, five days a week); the lower leg was not treated and served as a control. Bone architectural changes of the proximal tibia and bone formation around the osteotomy were evaluated using in vivo microCT scans at start of treatment and after three and six weeks. RESULTS: In both OVX and sham-OVX groups, EMF did not result in cancellous or cortical bone changes during follow-up. Moreover, EMF did not affect the amount of mineralised callus volume around the fibular osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we were unable to reproduce the strong beneficial findings reported by others. This might indicate that EMF treatment is very sensitive to the specific set-up, which would be a serious hindrance for clinical use. No evidence was found that EMF treatment can influence bone mass for the benefit of osteoporotic patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:230–5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4112789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41127892014-08-06 Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats van der Jagt, O. P. van der Linden, J. C. Waarsing, J. H. Verhaar, J. A. N. Weinans, H. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporotic and healthy rats. Moreover, we tested the effects of EMF on fracture healing. METHODS: EMF (20 Gauss) was examined in rats (aged 20 weeks), which underwent an ovariectomy (OVX; n = 8) or sham-ovariectomy (sham-OVX; n = 8). As a putative positive control, all rats received bilateral fibular osteotomies to examine the effects on fracture healing. Treatment was applied to one proximal lower leg (three hours a day, five days a week); the lower leg was not treated and served as a control. Bone architectural changes of the proximal tibia and bone formation around the osteotomy were evaluated using in vivo microCT scans at start of treatment and after three and six weeks. RESULTS: In both OVX and sham-OVX groups, EMF did not result in cancellous or cortical bone changes during follow-up. Moreover, EMF did not affect the amount of mineralised callus volume around the fibular osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we were unable to reproduce the strong beneficial findings reported by others. This might indicate that EMF treatment is very sensitive to the specific set-up, which would be a serious hindrance for clinical use. No evidence was found that EMF treatment can influence bone mass for the benefit of osteoporotic patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:230–5. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4112789/ /pubmed/25015993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221 Text en ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
van der Jagt, O. P.
van der Linden, J. C.
Waarsing, J. H.
Verhaar, J. A. N.
Weinans, H.
Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title_full Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title_fullStr Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title_full_unstemmed Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title_short Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
title_sort electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderjagtop electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats
AT vanderlindenjc electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats
AT waarsingjh electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats
AT verhaarjan electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats
AT weinansh electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats