Cargando…
Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats
OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporoti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221 |
_version_ | 1782328209173381120 |
---|---|
author | van der Jagt, O. P. van der Linden, J. C. Waarsing, J. H. Verhaar, J. A. N. Weinans, H. |
author_facet | van der Jagt, O. P. van der Linden, J. C. Waarsing, J. H. Verhaar, J. A. N. Weinans, H. |
author_sort | van der Jagt, O. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporotic and healthy rats. Moreover, we tested the effects of EMF on fracture healing. METHODS: EMF (20 Gauss) was examined in rats (aged 20 weeks), which underwent an ovariectomy (OVX; n = 8) or sham-ovariectomy (sham-OVX; n = 8). As a putative positive control, all rats received bilateral fibular osteotomies to examine the effects on fracture healing. Treatment was applied to one proximal lower leg (three hours a day, five days a week); the lower leg was not treated and served as a control. Bone architectural changes of the proximal tibia and bone formation around the osteotomy were evaluated using in vivo microCT scans at start of treatment and after three and six weeks. RESULTS: In both OVX and sham-OVX groups, EMF did not result in cancellous or cortical bone changes during follow-up. Moreover, EMF did not affect the amount of mineralised callus volume around the fibular osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we were unable to reproduce the strong beneficial findings reported by others. This might indicate that EMF treatment is very sensitive to the specific set-up, which would be a serious hindrance for clinical use. No evidence was found that EMF treatment can influence bone mass for the benefit of osteoporotic patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:230–5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4112789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41127892014-08-06 Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats van der Jagt, O. P. van der Linden, J. C. Waarsing, J. H. Verhaar, J. A. N. Weinans, H. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: Electromagnetic fields (EMF) are widely used in musculoskeletal disorders. There are indications that EMF might also be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis. To justify clinical follow-up experiments, we examined the effects of EMF on bone micro-architectural changes in osteoporotic and healthy rats. Moreover, we tested the effects of EMF on fracture healing. METHODS: EMF (20 Gauss) was examined in rats (aged 20 weeks), which underwent an ovariectomy (OVX; n = 8) or sham-ovariectomy (sham-OVX; n = 8). As a putative positive control, all rats received bilateral fibular osteotomies to examine the effects on fracture healing. Treatment was applied to one proximal lower leg (three hours a day, five days a week); the lower leg was not treated and served as a control. Bone architectural changes of the proximal tibia and bone formation around the osteotomy were evaluated using in vivo microCT scans at start of treatment and after three and six weeks. RESULTS: In both OVX and sham-OVX groups, EMF did not result in cancellous or cortical bone changes during follow-up. Moreover, EMF did not affect the amount of mineralised callus volume around the fibular osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we were unable to reproduce the strong beneficial findings reported by others. This might indicate that EMF treatment is very sensitive to the specific set-up, which would be a serious hindrance for clinical use. No evidence was found that EMF treatment can influence bone mass for the benefit of osteoporotic patients. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:230–5. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2014-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4112789/ /pubmed/25015993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221 Text en ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research van der Jagt, O. P. van der Linden, J. C. Waarsing, J. H. Verhaar, J. A. N. Weinans, H. Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title | Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title_full | Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title_fullStr | Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title_short | Electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
title_sort | electromagnetic fields do not affect bone micro-architecture in osteoporotic rats |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25015993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.37.2000221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderjagtop electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats AT vanderlindenjc electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats AT waarsingjh electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats AT verhaarjan electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats AT weinansh electromagneticfieldsdonotaffectbonemicroarchitectureinosteoporoticrats |