Cargando…
Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study
According to the crowd within effect, the average of two estimates from one person tends to be more accurate than a single estimate of that person. The effect implies that the well documented wisdom of the crowd effect—the crowd's average estimate tends to be more accurate than the individual e...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00786 |
_version_ | 1782328224889438208 |
---|---|
author | Steegen, Sara Dewitte, Laura Tuerlinckx, Francis Vanpaemel, Wolf |
author_facet | Steegen, Sara Dewitte, Laura Tuerlinckx, Francis Vanpaemel, Wolf |
author_sort | Steegen, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the crowd within effect, the average of two estimates from one person tends to be more accurate than a single estimate of that person. The effect implies that the well documented wisdom of the crowd effect—the crowd's average estimate tends to be more accurate than the individual estimates—can be obtained within a single individual. In this paper, we performed a high-powered, pre-registered replication study of the original experiment. Our replication results are evaluated with the traditional null hypothesis significance testing approach, as well as with effect sizes and their confidence intervals. We adopted a co-pilot approach, in the sense that all analyses were performed independently by two researchers using different analysis software. Moreover, we report Bayes factors for all tests. We successfully replicated the crowd within effect, both when the second guess was made immediately after the first guess, as well as when it was made 3 weeks later. The experimental protocol, the raw data, the post-processed data and the analysis code are available online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4112915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41129152014-08-12 Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study Steegen, Sara Dewitte, Laura Tuerlinckx, Francis Vanpaemel, Wolf Front Psychol Psychology According to the crowd within effect, the average of two estimates from one person tends to be more accurate than a single estimate of that person. The effect implies that the well documented wisdom of the crowd effect—the crowd's average estimate tends to be more accurate than the individual estimates—can be obtained within a single individual. In this paper, we performed a high-powered, pre-registered replication study of the original experiment. Our replication results are evaluated with the traditional null hypothesis significance testing approach, as well as with effect sizes and their confidence intervals. We adopted a co-pilot approach, in the sense that all analyses were performed independently by two researchers using different analysis software. Moreover, we report Bayes factors for all tests. We successfully replicated the crowd within effect, both when the second guess was made immediately after the first guess, as well as when it was made 3 weeks later. The experimental protocol, the raw data, the post-processed data and the analysis code are available online. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4112915/ /pubmed/25120505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00786 Text en Copyright © 2014 Steegen, Dewitte, Tuerlinckx and Vanpaemel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Steegen, Sara Dewitte, Laura Tuerlinckx, Francis Vanpaemel, Wolf Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title | Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title_full | Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title_fullStr | Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title_short | Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
title_sort | measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steegensara measuringthecrowdwithinagainapreregisteredreplicationstudy AT dewittelaura measuringthecrowdwithinagainapreregisteredreplicationstudy AT tuerlinckxfrancis measuringthecrowdwithinagainapreregisteredreplicationstudy AT vanpaemelwolf measuringthecrowdwithinagainapreregisteredreplicationstudy |