Cargando…
Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90 |
_version_ | 1782328228929601536 |
---|---|
author | Murdoch, Maureen Simon, Alisha Baines Polusny, Melissa Anderson Bangerter, Ann Kay Grill, Joseph Patrick Noorbaloochi, Siamak Partin, Melissa Ruth |
author_facet | Murdoch, Maureen Simon, Alisha Baines Polusny, Melissa Anderson Bangerter, Ann Kay Grill, Joseph Patrick Noorbaloochi, Siamak Partin, Melissa Ruth |
author_sort | Murdoch, Maureen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions—ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous—on survey response and on respondents’ representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. METHODS: A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. RESULTS: Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents’ characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants’ “honesty” or “accuracy” than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4112969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41129692014-07-29 Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial Murdoch, Maureen Simon, Alisha Baines Polusny, Melissa Anderson Bangerter, Ann Kay Grill, Joseph Patrick Noorbaloochi, Siamak Partin, Melissa Ruth BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions—ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous—on survey response and on respondents’ representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. METHODS: A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. RESULTS: Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents’ characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants’ “honesty” or “accuracy” than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research. BioMed Central 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4112969/ /pubmed/25027174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90 Text en Copyright © 2014 Murdoch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Murdoch, Maureen Simon, Alisha Baines Polusny, Melissa Anderson Bangerter, Ann Kay Grill, Joseph Patrick Noorbaloochi, Siamak Partin, Melissa Ruth Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murdochmaureen impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT simonalishabaines impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polusnymelissaanderson impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bangerterannkay impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grilljosephpatrick impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT noorbaloochisiamak impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT partinmelissaruth impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial |