Cargando…

Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murdoch, Maureen, Simon, Alisha Baines, Polusny, Melissa Anderson, Bangerter, Ann Kay, Grill, Joseph Patrick, Noorbaloochi, Siamak, Partin, Melissa Ruth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90
_version_ 1782328228929601536
author Murdoch, Maureen
Simon, Alisha Baines
Polusny, Melissa Anderson
Bangerter, Ann Kay
Grill, Joseph Patrick
Noorbaloochi, Siamak
Partin, Melissa Ruth
author_facet Murdoch, Maureen
Simon, Alisha Baines
Polusny, Melissa Anderson
Bangerter, Ann Kay
Grill, Joseph Patrick
Noorbaloochi, Siamak
Partin, Melissa Ruth
author_sort Murdoch, Maureen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions—ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous—on survey response and on respondents’ representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. METHODS: A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. RESULTS: Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents’ characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants’ “honesty” or “accuracy” than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4112969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41129692014-07-29 Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial Murdoch, Maureen Simon, Alisha Baines Polusny, Melissa Anderson Bangerter, Ann Kay Grill, Joseph Patrick Noorbaloochi, Siamak Partin, Melissa Ruth BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Anonymous survey methods appear to promote greater disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information compared to non-anonymous methods. Higher disclosure rates have traditionally been interpreted as being more accurate than lower rates. We examined the impact of 3 increasingly private mailed survey conditions—ranging from potentially identifiable to completely anonymous—on survey response and on respondents’ representativeness of the underlying sampling frame, completeness in answering sensitive survey items, and disclosure of sensitive information. We also examined the impact of 2 incentives ($10 versus $20) on these outcomes. METHODS: A 3X2 factorial, randomized controlled trial of 324 representatively selected, male Gulf War I era veterans who had applied for United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits. Men were asked about past sexual assault experiences, childhood abuse, combat, other traumas, mental health symptoms, and sexual orientation. We used a novel technique, the pre-merged questionnaire, to link anonymous responses to administrative data. RESULTS: Response rates ranged from 56.0% to 63.3% across privacy conditions (p = 0.49) and from 52.8% to 68.1% across incentives (p = 0.007). Respondents’ characteristics differed by privacy and by incentive assignments, with completely anonymous respondents and $20 respondents appearing least different from their non-respondent counterparts. Survey completeness did not differ by privacy or by incentive. No clear pattern of disclosing sensitive information by privacy condition or by incentive emerged. For example, although all respondents came from the same sampling frame, estimates of sexual abuse ranged from 13.6% to 33.3% across privacy conditions, with the highest estimate coming from the intermediate privacy condition (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Greater privacy and larger incentives do not necessarily result in higher disclosure rates of sensitive information than lesser privacy and lower incentives. Furthermore, disclosure of sensitive or stigmatizing information under differing privacy conditions may have less to do with promoting or impeding participants’ “honesty” or “accuracy” than with selectively recruiting or attracting subpopulations that are higher or lower in such experiences. Pre-merged questionnaires bypassed many historical limitations of anonymous surveys and hold promise for exploring non-response issues in future research. BioMed Central 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4112969/ /pubmed/25027174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90 Text en Copyright © 2014 Murdoch et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murdoch, Maureen
Simon, Alisha Baines
Polusny, Melissa Anderson
Bangerter, Ann Kay
Grill, Joseph Patrick
Noorbaloochi, Siamak
Partin, Melissa Ruth
Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of different privacy conditions and incentives on survey response rate, participant representativeness, and disclosure of sensitive information: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25027174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-90
work_keys_str_mv AT murdochmaureen impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simonalishabaines impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT polusnymelissaanderson impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bangerterannkay impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grilljosephpatrick impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT noorbaloochisiamak impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT partinmelissaruth impactofdifferentprivacyconditionsandincentivesonsurveyresponserateparticipantrepresentativenessanddisclosureofsensitiveinformationarandomizedcontrolledtrial