Cargando…
Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94 |
_version_ | 1782328236405948416 |
---|---|
author | Kaneko, Fuminari Hayami, Tatsuya Aoyama, Toshiyuki Kizuka, Tomohiro |
author_facet | Kaneko, Fuminari Hayami, Tatsuya Aoyama, Toshiyuki Kizuka, Tomohiro |
author_sort | Kaneko, Fuminari |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. CONCLUSIONS: MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4113028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41130282014-07-29 Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction Kaneko, Fuminari Hayami, Tatsuya Aoyama, Toshiyuki Kizuka, Tomohiro J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. CONCLUSIONS: MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction. BioMed Central 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4113028/ /pubmed/24902891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kaneko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaneko, Fuminari Hayami, Tatsuya Aoyama, Toshiyuki Kizuka, Tomohiro Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title | Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title_full | Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title_fullStr | Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title_short | Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
title_sort | motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanekofuminari motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction AT hayamitatsuya motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction AT aoyamatoshiyuki motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction AT kizukatomohiro motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction |