Cargando…

Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction

BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneko, Fuminari, Hayami, Tatsuya, Aoyama, Toshiyuki, Kizuka, Tomohiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94
_version_ 1782328236405948416
author Kaneko, Fuminari
Hayami, Tatsuya
Aoyama, Toshiyuki
Kizuka, Tomohiro
author_facet Kaneko, Fuminari
Hayami, Tatsuya
Aoyama, Toshiyuki
Kizuka, Tomohiro
author_sort Kaneko, Fuminari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. CONCLUSIONS: MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4113028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41130282014-07-29 Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction Kaneko, Fuminari Hayami, Tatsuya Aoyama, Toshiyuki Kizuka, Tomohiro J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS: Eight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition. RESULTS: MEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES. CONCLUSIONS: MEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction. BioMed Central 2014-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4113028/ /pubmed/24902891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kaneko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kaneko, Fuminari
Hayami, Tatsuya
Aoyama, Toshiyuki
Kizuka, Tomohiro
Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title_full Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title_fullStr Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title_full_unstemmed Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title_short Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
title_sort motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24902891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-94
work_keys_str_mv AT kanekofuminari motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction
AT hayamitatsuya motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction
AT aoyamatoshiyuki motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction
AT kizukatomohiro motorimageryandelectricalstimulationreproducecorticospinalexcitabilityatlevelssimilartovoluntarymusclecontraction