Cargando…
Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses
Macrophages play a crucial role in all stages of cutaneous wound healing responses and dysregulation of macrophage function can result in derailed wound repair. The phenotype of macrophages is influenced by the wound microenvironment and evolves during healing from a more pro-inflammatory (M1) profi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25068282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102994 |
_version_ | 1782328282157416448 |
---|---|
author | Jetten, Nadine Roumans, Nadia Gijbels, Marion J. Romano, Andrea Post, Mark J. de Winther, Menno P. J. van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. Xanthoulea, Sofia |
author_facet | Jetten, Nadine Roumans, Nadia Gijbels, Marion J. Romano, Andrea Post, Mark J. de Winther, Menno P. J. van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. Xanthoulea, Sofia |
author_sort | Jetten, Nadine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Macrophages play a crucial role in all stages of cutaneous wound healing responses and dysregulation of macrophage function can result in derailed wound repair. The phenotype of macrophages is influenced by the wound microenvironment and evolves during healing from a more pro-inflammatory (M1) profile in early stages, to a less inflammatory pro-healing (M2) phenotype in later stages of repair. The aim of the current study was to investigate the potential of exogenous administration of M2 macrophages to promote wound healing in an experimental mouse model of cutaneous injury. Bone marrow derived macrophages were stimulated in-vitro with IL-4 or IL-10 to obtain two different subsets of M2-polarized cells, M2a or M2c respectively. Polarized macrophages were injected into full-thickness excisional skin wounds of either C57BL/6 or diabetic db/db mice. Control groups were injected with non-polarized (M0) macrophages or saline. Our data indicate that despite M2 macrophages exhibit an anti-inflammatory phenotype in-vitro, they do not improve wound closure in wild type mice while they delay healing in diabetic mice. Examination of wounds on day 15 post-injury indicated delayed re-epithelialization and persistence of neutrophils in M2 macrophage treated diabetic wounds. Therefore, topical application of ex-vivo generated M2 macrophages is not beneficial and contraindicated for cell therapy of skin wounds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4113363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41133632014-08-04 Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses Jetten, Nadine Roumans, Nadia Gijbels, Marion J. Romano, Andrea Post, Mark J. de Winther, Menno P. J. van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. Xanthoulea, Sofia PLoS One Research Article Macrophages play a crucial role in all stages of cutaneous wound healing responses and dysregulation of macrophage function can result in derailed wound repair. The phenotype of macrophages is influenced by the wound microenvironment and evolves during healing from a more pro-inflammatory (M1) profile in early stages, to a less inflammatory pro-healing (M2) phenotype in later stages of repair. The aim of the current study was to investigate the potential of exogenous administration of M2 macrophages to promote wound healing in an experimental mouse model of cutaneous injury. Bone marrow derived macrophages were stimulated in-vitro with IL-4 or IL-10 to obtain two different subsets of M2-polarized cells, M2a or M2c respectively. Polarized macrophages were injected into full-thickness excisional skin wounds of either C57BL/6 or diabetic db/db mice. Control groups were injected with non-polarized (M0) macrophages or saline. Our data indicate that despite M2 macrophages exhibit an anti-inflammatory phenotype in-vitro, they do not improve wound closure in wild type mice while they delay healing in diabetic mice. Examination of wounds on day 15 post-injury indicated delayed re-epithelialization and persistence of neutrophils in M2 macrophage treated diabetic wounds. Therefore, topical application of ex-vivo generated M2 macrophages is not beneficial and contraindicated for cell therapy of skin wounds. Public Library of Science 2014-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4113363/ /pubmed/25068282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102994 Text en © 2014 Jetten et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jetten, Nadine Roumans, Nadia Gijbels, Marion J. Romano, Andrea Post, Mark J. de Winther, Menno P. J. van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. Xanthoulea, Sofia Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title | Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title_full | Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title_fullStr | Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title_short | Wound Administration of M2-Polarized Macrophages Does Not Improve Murine Cutaneous Healing Responses |
title_sort | wound administration of m2-polarized macrophages does not improve murine cutaneous healing responses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25068282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jettennadine woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT roumansnadia woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT gijbelsmarionj woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT romanoandrea woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT postmarkj woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT dewinthermennopj woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT vanderhulstrenerwj woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses AT xanthouleasofia woundadministrationofm2polarizedmacrophagesdoesnotimprovemurinecutaneoushealingresponses |