Cargando…

Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture

BACKGROUND: The authors sought to compare the use of the nonabsorbable polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVA, Merocel) and absorbable synthetic polyurethane foam (SPF, Nasopore Forte plus) as intranasal splints after closed reduction of fractured nasal bones during the hospitalization period. METHODS: The m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yi, Chang Ryul, Kim, Young Joon, Kim, Hoon, Nam, Sang Hyun, Choi, Young Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075356
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.350
_version_ 1782328323381133312
author Yi, Chang Ryul
Kim, Young Joon
Kim, Hoon
Nam, Sang Hyun
Choi, Young Woong
author_facet Yi, Chang Ryul
Kim, Young Joon
Kim, Hoon
Nam, Sang Hyun
Choi, Young Woong
author_sort Yi, Chang Ryul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The authors sought to compare the use of the nonabsorbable polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVA, Merocel) and absorbable synthetic polyurethane foam (SPF, Nasopore Forte plus) as intranasal splints after closed reduction of fractured nasal bones during the hospitalization period. METHODS: The medical records of 111 patients who underwent closed reduction for nasal bone fracture at Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, from 2012 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. PVA (group A) or SPF (group B) was packed as an internal splint after closed reduction. The efficacy of the materials was compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: PVA was used in 82 patients, and SPF was used in 29 patients. The patients in group B complained significantly more of nasal pain on the first day after operation than the patients in group A. Headaches on the operation day were significantly more painful in group B than in group A. Bleeding on the fourth postoperative day was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A. The patients in group B exhibited significantly more intensive nasal obstruction on the operation day and the following day than the patients in group A. However, on the third and fourth postoperative days, the nasal obstruction in group B was less than that in group A. The pain and bleeding related to the packing material was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SPF as an absorbable packing material is a reasonable substitute for the traditional nonabsorbable material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4113693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41136932014-07-29 Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture Yi, Chang Ryul Kim, Young Joon Kim, Hoon Nam, Sang Hyun Choi, Young Woong Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The authors sought to compare the use of the nonabsorbable polyvinyl alcohol sponge (PVA, Merocel) and absorbable synthetic polyurethane foam (SPF, Nasopore Forte plus) as intranasal splints after closed reduction of fractured nasal bones during the hospitalization period. METHODS: The medical records of 111 patients who underwent closed reduction for nasal bone fracture at Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, from 2012 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. PVA (group A) or SPF (group B) was packed as an internal splint after closed reduction. The efficacy of the materials was compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: PVA was used in 82 patients, and SPF was used in 29 patients. The patients in group B complained significantly more of nasal pain on the first day after operation than the patients in group A. Headaches on the operation day were significantly more painful in group B than in group A. Bleeding on the fourth postoperative day was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A. The patients in group B exhibited significantly more intensive nasal obstruction on the operation day and the following day than the patients in group A. However, on the third and fourth postoperative days, the nasal obstruction in group B was less than that in group A. The pain and bleeding related to the packing material was significantly reduced in group B as compared to group A. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SPF as an absorbable packing material is a reasonable substitute for the traditional nonabsorbable material. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-07 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4113693/ /pubmed/25075356 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.350 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yi, Chang Ryul
Kim, Young Joon
Kim, Hoon
Nam, Sang Hyun
Choi, Young Woong
Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title_full Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title_fullStr Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title_short Comparison Study of the Use of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Materials as Internal Splints after Closed Reduction for Nasal Bone Fracture
title_sort comparison study of the use of absorbable and nonabsorbable materials as internal splints after closed reduction for nasal bone fracture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4113693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075356
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.4.350
work_keys_str_mv AT yichangryul comparisonstudyoftheuseofabsorbableandnonabsorbablematerialsasinternalsplintsafterclosedreductionfornasalbonefracture
AT kimyoungjoon comparisonstudyoftheuseofabsorbableandnonabsorbablematerialsasinternalsplintsafterclosedreductionfornasalbonefracture
AT kimhoon comparisonstudyoftheuseofabsorbableandnonabsorbablematerialsasinternalsplintsafterclosedreductionfornasalbonefracture
AT namsanghyun comparisonstudyoftheuseofabsorbableandnonabsorbablematerialsasinternalsplintsafterclosedreductionfornasalbonefracture
AT choiyoungwoong comparisonstudyoftheuseofabsorbableandnonabsorbablematerialsasinternalsplintsafterclosedreductionfornasalbonefracture