Cargando…

Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences

Semantic ambiguity resolution is an essential and frequent part of speech comprehension because many words map onto multiple meanings (e.g., “bark,” “bank”). Neuroimaging research highlights the importance of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior temporal cortex in this proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitello, Sylvia, Warren, Jane E., Devlin, Joseph T., Rodd, Jennifer M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530
_version_ 1782328400040427520
author Vitello, Sylvia
Warren, Jane E.
Devlin, Joseph T.
Rodd, Jennifer M.
author_facet Vitello, Sylvia
Warren, Jane E.
Devlin, Joseph T.
Rodd, Jennifer M.
author_sort Vitello, Sylvia
collection PubMed
description Semantic ambiguity resolution is an essential and frequent part of speech comprehension because many words map onto multiple meanings (e.g., “bark,” “bank”). Neuroimaging research highlights the importance of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior temporal cortex in this process but the roles they serve in ambiguity resolution are uncertain. One possibility is that both regions are engaged in the processes of semantic reinterpretation that follows incorrect interpretation of an ambiguous word. Here we used fMRI to investigate this hypothesis. 20 native British English monolinguals were scanned whilst listening to sentences that contained an ambiguous word. To induce semantic reinterpretation, the disambiguating information was presented after the ambiguous word and delayed until the end of the sentence (e.g., “the teacher explained that the BARK was going to be very damp”). These sentences were compared to well-matched unambiguous sentences. Supporting the reinterpretation hypothesis, these ambiguous sentences produced more activation in both the LIFG and the left posterior inferior temporal cortex. Importantly, all but one subject showed ambiguity-related peaks within both regions, demonstrating that the group-level results were driven by high inter-subject consistency. Further support came from the finding that activation in both regions was modulated by meaning dominance. Specifically, sentences containing biased ambiguous words, which have one more dominant meaning, produced greater activation than those with balanced ambiguous words, which have two equally frequent meanings. Because the context always supported the less frequent meaning, the biased words require reinterpretation more often than balanced words. This is the first evidence of dominance effects in the spoken modality and provides strong support that frontal and temporal regions support the updating of semantic representations during speech comprehension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4114184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41141842014-08-12 Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences Vitello, Sylvia Warren, Jane E. Devlin, Joseph T. Rodd, Jennifer M. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Semantic ambiguity resolution is an essential and frequent part of speech comprehension because many words map onto multiple meanings (e.g., “bark,” “bank”). Neuroimaging research highlights the importance of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and the left posterior temporal cortex in this process but the roles they serve in ambiguity resolution are uncertain. One possibility is that both regions are engaged in the processes of semantic reinterpretation that follows incorrect interpretation of an ambiguous word. Here we used fMRI to investigate this hypothesis. 20 native British English monolinguals were scanned whilst listening to sentences that contained an ambiguous word. To induce semantic reinterpretation, the disambiguating information was presented after the ambiguous word and delayed until the end of the sentence (e.g., “the teacher explained that the BARK was going to be very damp”). These sentences were compared to well-matched unambiguous sentences. Supporting the reinterpretation hypothesis, these ambiguous sentences produced more activation in both the LIFG and the left posterior inferior temporal cortex. Importantly, all but one subject showed ambiguity-related peaks within both regions, demonstrating that the group-level results were driven by high inter-subject consistency. Further support came from the finding that activation in both regions was modulated by meaning dominance. Specifically, sentences containing biased ambiguous words, which have one more dominant meaning, produced greater activation than those with balanced ambiguous words, which have two equally frequent meanings. Because the context always supported the less frequent meaning, the biased words require reinterpretation more often than balanced words. This is the first evidence of dominance effects in the spoken modality and provides strong support that frontal and temporal regions support the updating of semantic representations during speech comprehension. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4114184/ /pubmed/25120445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vitello, Warren, Devlin and Rodd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Vitello, Sylvia
Warren, Jane E.
Devlin, Joseph T.
Rodd, Jennifer M.
Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title_full Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title_fullStr Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title_full_unstemmed Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title_short Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
title_sort roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530
work_keys_str_mv AT vitellosylvia rolesoffrontalandtemporalregionsinreinterpretingsemanticallyambiguoussentences
AT warrenjanee rolesoffrontalandtemporalregionsinreinterpretingsemanticallyambiguoussentences
AT devlinjosepht rolesoffrontalandtemporalregionsinreinterpretingsemanticallyambiguoussentences
AT roddjenniferm rolesoffrontalandtemporalregionsinreinterpretingsemanticallyambiguoussentences