Cargando…

Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons

Motoneurons provide the only conduit for motor commands to reach muscles. For many years, motoneurons were in fact considered to be little more than passive “wires”. Systematic studies in the past 25 years however have clearly demonstrated that the intrinsic electrical properties of motoneurons are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Michael D., Heckman, Charles J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00081
_version_ 1782328405269676032
author Johnson, Michael D.
Heckman, Charles J.
author_facet Johnson, Michael D.
Heckman, Charles J.
author_sort Johnson, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description Motoneurons provide the only conduit for motor commands to reach muscles. For many years, motoneurons were in fact considered to be little more than passive “wires”. Systematic studies in the past 25 years however have clearly demonstrated that the intrinsic electrical properties of motoneurons are under strong neuromodulatory control via multiple sources. The discovery of potent neuromodulation from the brainstem and its ability to change the gain of motoneurons shows that the “passive” view of the motor output stage is no longer tenable. A mechanism for gain control at the motor output stage makes good functional sense considering our capability of generating an enormous range of forces, from very delicate (e.g., putting in a contact lens) to highly forceful (emergency reactions). Just as sensory systems need gain control to deal with a wide dynamic range of inputs, so to might motor output need gain control to deal with the wide dynamic range of the normal movement repertoire. Two problems emerge from the potential use of the brainstem monoaminergic projection to motoneurons for gain control. First, the projection is highly diffuse anatomically, so that independent control of the gains of different motor pools is not feasible. In fact, the system is so diffuse that gain for all the motor pools in a limb likely increases in concert. Second, if there is a system that increases gain, probably a system to reduce gain is also needed. In this review, we summarize recent studies that show local inhibitory circuits within the spinal cord, especially reciprocal and recurrent inhibition, have the potential to solve both of these problems as well as constitute another source of gain modulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4114207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41142072014-08-12 Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons Johnson, Michael D. Heckman, Charles J. Front Neural Circuits Neuroscience Motoneurons provide the only conduit for motor commands to reach muscles. For many years, motoneurons were in fact considered to be little more than passive “wires”. Systematic studies in the past 25 years however have clearly demonstrated that the intrinsic electrical properties of motoneurons are under strong neuromodulatory control via multiple sources. The discovery of potent neuromodulation from the brainstem and its ability to change the gain of motoneurons shows that the “passive” view of the motor output stage is no longer tenable. A mechanism for gain control at the motor output stage makes good functional sense considering our capability of generating an enormous range of forces, from very delicate (e.g., putting in a contact lens) to highly forceful (emergency reactions). Just as sensory systems need gain control to deal with a wide dynamic range of inputs, so to might motor output need gain control to deal with the wide dynamic range of the normal movement repertoire. Two problems emerge from the potential use of the brainstem monoaminergic projection to motoneurons for gain control. First, the projection is highly diffuse anatomically, so that independent control of the gains of different motor pools is not feasible. In fact, the system is so diffuse that gain for all the motor pools in a limb likely increases in concert. Second, if there is a system that increases gain, probably a system to reduce gain is also needed. In this review, we summarize recent studies that show local inhibitory circuits within the spinal cord, especially reciprocal and recurrent inhibition, have the potential to solve both of these problems as well as constitute another source of gain modulation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4114207/ /pubmed/25120435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00081 Text en Copyright © 2014 Johnson and Heckman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Johnson, Michael D.
Heckman, Charles J.
Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title_full Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title_fullStr Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title_full_unstemmed Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title_short Gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
title_sort gain control mechanisms in spinal motoneurons
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00081
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmichaeld gaincontrolmechanismsinspinalmotoneurons
AT heckmancharlesj gaincontrolmechanismsinspinalmotoneurons