Cargando…

A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors

Research suggests that the presence of a non-referent from the same category as the referent interferes with anaphor resolution. In five experiments, the hypothesis that multiple non-referents would produce a cumulative interference effect (i.e., a fan effect) was examined. This hypothesis was suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Autry, Kevin S., Levine, William H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00818
_version_ 1782328419140239360
author Autry, Kevin S.
Levine, William H.
author_facet Autry, Kevin S.
Levine, William H.
author_sort Autry, Kevin S.
collection PubMed
description Research suggests that the presence of a non-referent from the same category as the referent interferes with anaphor resolution. In five experiments, the hypothesis that multiple non-referents would produce a cumulative interference effect (i.e., a fan effect) was examined. This hypothesis was supported in Experiments 1A and 1B, with subjects being less accurate and slower to recognize referents (1A) and non-referents (1B) as the number of potential referents increased from two to five. Surprisingly, the number of potential referents led to a decrease in anaphor reading times. The results of Experiments 2A and 2B replicated the probe-recognition results in a completely within-subjects design and ruled out the possibility that a speeded-reading strategy led to the fan-effect findings. The results of Experiment 3 provided evidence that subjects were resolving the anaphors. These results suggest that multiple non-referents do produce a cumulative interference effect; however, additional research is necessary to explore the effect on anaphor reading times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4114326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41143262014-08-12 A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors Autry, Kevin S. Levine, William H. Front Psychol Psychology Research suggests that the presence of a non-referent from the same category as the referent interferes with anaphor resolution. In five experiments, the hypothesis that multiple non-referents would produce a cumulative interference effect (i.e., a fan effect) was examined. This hypothesis was supported in Experiments 1A and 1B, with subjects being less accurate and slower to recognize referents (1A) and non-referents (1B) as the number of potential referents increased from two to five. Surprisingly, the number of potential referents led to a decrease in anaphor reading times. The results of Experiments 2A and 2B replicated the probe-recognition results in a completely within-subjects design and ruled out the possibility that a speeded-reading strategy led to the fan-effect findings. The results of Experiment 3 provided evidence that subjects were resolving the anaphors. These results suggest that multiple non-referents do produce a cumulative interference effect; however, additional research is necessary to explore the effect on anaphor reading times. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4114326/ /pubmed/25120519 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00818 Text en Copyright © 2014 Autry and Levine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Autry, Kevin S.
Levine, William H.
A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title_full A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title_fullStr A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title_full_unstemmed A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title_short A fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
title_sort fan effect in anaphor processing: effects of multiple distractors
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25120519
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00818
work_keys_str_mv AT autrykevins afaneffectinanaphorprocessingeffectsofmultipledistractors
AT levinewilliamh afaneffectinanaphorprocessingeffectsofmultipledistractors
AT autrykevins faneffectinanaphorprocessingeffectsofmultipledistractors
AT levinewilliamh faneffectinanaphorprocessingeffectsofmultipledistractors