Cargando…
Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81 |
_version_ | 1782328489502834688 |
---|---|
author | Pham, Ba’ Tu, Hong Anh Thi Han, Dolly Pechlivanoglou, Petros Miller, Fiona Rac, Valeria Chin, Warren Tricco, Andrea C Paulden, Mike Bielecki, Joanna Krahn, Murray |
author_facet | Pham, Ba’ Tu, Hong Anh Thi Han, Dolly Pechlivanoglou, Petros Miller, Fiona Rac, Valeria Chin, Warren Tricco, Andrea C Paulden, Mike Bielecki, Joanna Krahn, Murray |
author_sort | Pham, Ba’ |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early economic evaluation is essential to assess the value of emerging technologies, but empirical data to inform the current practice of early evaluation is limited. We propose a systematic review of early economic evaluation studies in order to better understand the current practice. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol describes a systematic review of economic evaluation studies of regulated health technologies in which the evaluation is conducted prior to regulatory approval and when the technology effectiveness is not well established. Included studies must report an economic evaluation, defined as the comparative analysis of alternatives with respect to their associated costs and health consequences, and must evaluate some regulated health technology such as pharmaceuticals, biologics, high-risk medical devices, or biomarkers. We will conduct the literature search on multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and EconLit. Additional citations will be identified via scanning reference lists and author searching. We suspect that many early economic evaluation studies are unpublished, especially those conducted for internal use only. Additionally, we use a chain-referral sampling approach to identify authors of unpublished studies who work in technology discovery and development, starting out with our contact lists and authors who published relevant studies. Citation screening and full-text review will be conducted by pairs of reviewers. Abstracted data will include those related to the decision context and decision problem of the early evaluation, evaluation methods (e.g., data sources, methods, and assumptions used to identify, measure, and value the likely effectiveness and the costs and consequences of the new technology, handling of uncertainty), and whether the study results adequately address the main study question or objective. Data will be summarized overall and stratified by publication status. DISCUSSION: This study is timely to inform early economic evaluation practice, given the international trend in early health technology assessment initiatives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4114797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41147972014-07-30 Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review Pham, Ba’ Tu, Hong Anh Thi Han, Dolly Pechlivanoglou, Petros Miller, Fiona Rac, Valeria Chin, Warren Tricco, Andrea C Paulden, Mike Bielecki, Joanna Krahn, Murray Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early economic evaluation is essential to assess the value of emerging technologies, but empirical data to inform the current practice of early evaluation is limited. We propose a systematic review of early economic evaluation studies in order to better understand the current practice. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol describes a systematic review of economic evaluation studies of regulated health technologies in which the evaluation is conducted prior to regulatory approval and when the technology effectiveness is not well established. Included studies must report an economic evaluation, defined as the comparative analysis of alternatives with respect to their associated costs and health consequences, and must evaluate some regulated health technology such as pharmaceuticals, biologics, high-risk medical devices, or biomarkers. We will conduct the literature search on multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and EconLit. Additional citations will be identified via scanning reference lists and author searching. We suspect that many early economic evaluation studies are unpublished, especially those conducted for internal use only. Additionally, we use a chain-referral sampling approach to identify authors of unpublished studies who work in technology discovery and development, starting out with our contact lists and authors who published relevant studies. Citation screening and full-text review will be conducted by pairs of reviewers. Abstracted data will include those related to the decision context and decision problem of the early evaluation, evaluation methods (e.g., data sources, methods, and assumptions used to identify, measure, and value the likely effectiveness and the costs and consequences of the new technology, handling of uncertainty), and whether the study results adequately address the main study question or objective. Data will be summarized overall and stratified by publication status. DISCUSSION: This study is timely to inform early economic evaluation practice, given the international trend in early health technology assessment initiatives. BioMed Central 2014-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4114797/ /pubmed/25055987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Pham, Ba’ Tu, Hong Anh Thi Han, Dolly Pechlivanoglou, Petros Miller, Fiona Rac, Valeria Chin, Warren Tricco, Andrea C Paulden, Mike Bielecki, Joanna Krahn, Murray Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title | Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title_full | Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title_short | Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
title_sort | early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phamba earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT tuhonganhthi earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT handolly earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT pechlivanogloupetros earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT millerfiona earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT racvaleria earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT chinwarren earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT triccoandreac earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT pauldenmike earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT bieleckijoanna earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview AT krahnmurray earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview |