Cargando…

Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pham, Ba’, Tu, Hong Anh Thi, Han, Dolly, Pechlivanoglou, Petros, Miller, Fiona, Rac, Valeria, Chin, Warren, Tricco, Andrea C, Paulden, Mike, Bielecki, Joanna, Krahn, Murray
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81
_version_ 1782328489502834688
author Pham, Ba’
Tu, Hong Anh Thi
Han, Dolly
Pechlivanoglou, Petros
Miller, Fiona
Rac, Valeria
Chin, Warren
Tricco, Andrea C
Paulden, Mike
Bielecki, Joanna
Krahn, Murray
author_facet Pham, Ba’
Tu, Hong Anh Thi
Han, Dolly
Pechlivanoglou, Petros
Miller, Fiona
Rac, Valeria
Chin, Warren
Tricco, Andrea C
Paulden, Mike
Bielecki, Joanna
Krahn, Murray
author_sort Pham, Ba’
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early economic evaluation is essential to assess the value of emerging technologies, but empirical data to inform the current practice of early evaluation is limited. We propose a systematic review of early economic evaluation studies in order to better understand the current practice. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol describes a systematic review of economic evaluation studies of regulated health technologies in which the evaluation is conducted prior to regulatory approval and when the technology effectiveness is not well established. Included studies must report an economic evaluation, defined as the comparative analysis of alternatives with respect to their associated costs and health consequences, and must evaluate some regulated health technology such as pharmaceuticals, biologics, high-risk medical devices, or biomarkers. We will conduct the literature search on multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and EconLit. Additional citations will be identified via scanning reference lists and author searching. We suspect that many early economic evaluation studies are unpublished, especially those conducted for internal use only. Additionally, we use a chain-referral sampling approach to identify authors of unpublished studies who work in technology discovery and development, starting out with our contact lists and authors who published relevant studies. Citation screening and full-text review will be conducted by pairs of reviewers. Abstracted data will include those related to the decision context and decision problem of the early evaluation, evaluation methods (e.g., data sources, methods, and assumptions used to identify, measure, and value the likely effectiveness and the costs and consequences of the new technology, handling of uncertainty), and whether the study results adequately address the main study question or objective. Data will be summarized overall and stratified by publication status. DISCUSSION: This study is timely to inform early economic evaluation practice, given the international trend in early health technology assessment initiatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4114797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41147972014-07-30 Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review Pham, Ba’ Tu, Hong Anh Thi Han, Dolly Pechlivanoglou, Petros Miller, Fiona Rac, Valeria Chin, Warren Tricco, Andrea C Paulden, Mike Bielecki, Joanna Krahn, Murray Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: The concept of early health technology assessment, discussed well over a decade, has now been collaboratively implemented by industry, government, and academia to select and expedite the development of emerging technologies that may address the needs of patients and health systems. Early economic evaluation is essential to assess the value of emerging technologies, but empirical data to inform the current practice of early evaluation is limited. We propose a systematic review of early economic evaluation studies in order to better understand the current practice. METHODS/DESIGN: This protocol describes a systematic review of economic evaluation studies of regulated health technologies in which the evaluation is conducted prior to regulatory approval and when the technology effectiveness is not well established. Included studies must report an economic evaluation, defined as the comparative analysis of alternatives with respect to their associated costs and health consequences, and must evaluate some regulated health technology such as pharmaceuticals, biologics, high-risk medical devices, or biomarkers. We will conduct the literature search on multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Databases, and EconLit. Additional citations will be identified via scanning reference lists and author searching. We suspect that many early economic evaluation studies are unpublished, especially those conducted for internal use only. Additionally, we use a chain-referral sampling approach to identify authors of unpublished studies who work in technology discovery and development, starting out with our contact lists and authors who published relevant studies. Citation screening and full-text review will be conducted by pairs of reviewers. Abstracted data will include those related to the decision context and decision problem of the early evaluation, evaluation methods (e.g., data sources, methods, and assumptions used to identify, measure, and value the likely effectiveness and the costs and consequences of the new technology, handling of uncertainty), and whether the study results adequately address the main study question or objective. Data will be summarized overall and stratified by publication status. DISCUSSION: This study is timely to inform early economic evaluation practice, given the international trend in early health technology assessment initiatives. BioMed Central 2014-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4114797/ /pubmed/25055987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81 Text en Copyright © 2014 Pham et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Protocol
Pham, Ba’
Tu, Hong Anh Thi
Han, Dolly
Pechlivanoglou, Petros
Miller, Fiona
Rac, Valeria
Chin, Warren
Tricco, Andrea C
Paulden, Mike
Bielecki, Joanna
Krahn, Murray
Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title_full Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title_fullStr Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title_short Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
title_sort early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4114797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25055987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-81
work_keys_str_mv AT phamba earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT tuhonganhthi earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT handolly earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT pechlivanogloupetros earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT millerfiona earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT racvaleria earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT chinwarren earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT triccoandreac earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT pauldenmike earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT bieleckijoanna earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview
AT krahnmurray earlyeconomicevaluationofemerginghealthtechnologiesprotocolofasystematicreview