Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagno...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092986 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416 |
_version_ | 1782328554275471360 |
---|---|
author | Sethi, Ankur Bajaj, Anurag Malhotra, Gurveen Arora, Rohit R Khosla, Sandeep |
author_facet | Sethi, Ankur Bajaj, Anurag Malhotra, Gurveen Arora, Rohit R Khosla, Sandeep |
author_sort | Sethi, Ankur |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Random effect meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Primary and secondary analyses were restricted to studies using conventional Trop and hsTrop in the reference standard, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 8,628 patients met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) and hsTrop I (Siemens) had sensitivities of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92) and specificities of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77–0.80) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve between hsTrop (95% CI: 0.920) and conventional Trop (95% CI: 0.929) at the 99th percentile (P=0.62). hsTrop at the level of detection had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and a specificity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.40–0.42). The studies using a cut-off at coefficient of variance <10% as opposed to the 99th percentile for the conventional assay used for diagnosis reported higher diagnostic accuracy (relative diagnostic odds ratio =2.13, P=0.02). Five studies were included in the secondary analysis; hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.93) and a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.63–0.70). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: hsTrop have excellent diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction on presentation, but may not outperform conventional Trop assays. The variation among the studies can be explained, in part, by the cut-off used for conventional Trop assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4115590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41155902014-08-04 Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review Sethi, Ankur Bajaj, Anurag Malhotra, Gurveen Arora, Rohit R Khosla, Sandeep Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Random effect meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Primary and secondary analyses were restricted to studies using conventional Trop and hsTrop in the reference standard, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 8,628 patients met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) and hsTrop I (Siemens) had sensitivities of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92) and specificities of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77–0.80) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve between hsTrop (95% CI: 0.920) and conventional Trop (95% CI: 0.929) at the 99th percentile (P=0.62). hsTrop at the level of detection had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and a specificity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.40–0.42). The studies using a cut-off at coefficient of variance <10% as opposed to the 99th percentile for the conventional assay used for diagnosis reported higher diagnostic accuracy (relative diagnostic odds ratio =2.13, P=0.02). Five studies were included in the secondary analysis; hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.93) and a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.63–0.70). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: hsTrop have excellent diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction on presentation, but may not outperform conventional Trop assays. The variation among the studies can be explained, in part, by the cut-off used for conventional Trop assays. Dove Medical Press 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4115590/ /pubmed/25092986 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416 Text en © 2014 Sethi et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sethi, Ankur Bajaj, Anurag Malhotra, Gurveen Arora, Rohit R Khosla, Sandeep Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092986 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sethiankur diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT bajajanurag diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT malhotragurveen diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT arorarohitr diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview AT khoslasandeep diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview |