Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sethi, Ankur, Bajaj, Anurag, Malhotra, Gurveen, Arora, Rohit R, Khosla, Sandeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092986
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416
_version_ 1782328554275471360
author Sethi, Ankur
Bajaj, Anurag
Malhotra, Gurveen
Arora, Rohit R
Khosla, Sandeep
author_facet Sethi, Ankur
Bajaj, Anurag
Malhotra, Gurveen
Arora, Rohit R
Khosla, Sandeep
author_sort Sethi, Ankur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Random effect meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Primary and secondary analyses were restricted to studies using conventional Trop and hsTrop in the reference standard, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 8,628 patients met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) and hsTrop I (Siemens) had sensitivities of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92) and specificities of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77–0.80) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve between hsTrop (95% CI: 0.920) and conventional Trop (95% CI: 0.929) at the 99th percentile (P=0.62). hsTrop at the level of detection had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and a specificity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.40–0.42). The studies using a cut-off at coefficient of variance <10% as opposed to the 99th percentile for the conventional assay used for diagnosis reported higher diagnostic accuracy (relative diagnostic odds ratio =2.13, P=0.02). Five studies were included in the secondary analysis; hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.93) and a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.63–0.70). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: hsTrop have excellent diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction on presentation, but may not outperform conventional Trop assays. The variation among the studies can be explained, in part, by the cut-off used for conventional Trop assays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4115590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41155902014-08-04 Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review Sethi, Ankur Bajaj, Anurag Malhotra, Gurveen Arora, Rohit R Khosla, Sandeep Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: Recently, high-sensitive troponin (hsTrop) assays consistent with professional societies’ recommendations became available. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop on presentation. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of hsTrop in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Random effect meta-analyses and meta-regression were performed. Primary and secondary analyses were restricted to studies using conventional Trop and hsTrop in the reference standard, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with a total of 8,628 patients met the inclusion criteria for the primary analysis. hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) and hsTrop I (Siemens) had sensitivities of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86–0.91) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87–0.92) and specificities of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77–0.80) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87–0.90), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the area under the curve between hsTrop (95% CI: 0.920) and conventional Trop (95% CI: 0.929) at the 99th percentile (P=0.62). hsTrop at the level of detection had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96–0.98) and a specificity of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.40–0.42). The studies using a cut-off at coefficient of variance <10% as opposed to the 99th percentile for the conventional assay used for diagnosis reported higher diagnostic accuracy (relative diagnostic odds ratio =2.13, P=0.02). Five studies were included in the secondary analysis; hsTrop T (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd) had a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89–0.93) and a specificity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.63–0.70). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: hsTrop have excellent diagnostic accuracy for myocardial infarction on presentation, but may not outperform conventional Trop assays. The variation among the studies can be explained, in part, by the cut-off used for conventional Trop assays. Dove Medical Press 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4115590/ /pubmed/25092986 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416 Text en © 2014 Sethi et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sethi, Ankur
Bajaj, Anurag
Malhotra, Gurveen
Arora, Rohit R
Khosla, Sandeep
Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of sensitive or high-sensitive troponin on presentation for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4115590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092986
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S63416
work_keys_str_mv AT sethiankur diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT bajajanurag diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT malhotragurveen diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT arorarohitr diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT khoslasandeep diagnosticaccuracyofsensitiveorhighsensitivetroponinonpresentationformyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisandsystematicreview