Cargando…

Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an emergency condition that requires immediate, accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. However, little is known about the level of knowledge of doctors and nurses treating these patients in the Emergency Department. OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge of doctors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Irwani, Chew, Bao Li, Zaw, Wai Wai, Van Bever, Hugo P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097852
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2014.4.3.164
_version_ 1782328567207559168
author Ibrahim, Irwani
Chew, Bao Li
Zaw, Wai Wai
Van Bever, Hugo P
author_facet Ibrahim, Irwani
Chew, Bao Li
Zaw, Wai Wai
Van Bever, Hugo P
author_sort Ibrahim, Irwani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an emergency condition that requires immediate, accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. However, little is known about the level of knowledge of doctors and nurses treating these patients in the Emergency Department. OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge of doctors and nurses in the Emergency Department on the recent definition and treatment recommendations of anaphylaxis. METHODS: We surveyed doctors and nurses of all grades in a tertiary Hospital Emergency Department using a standardized anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: We had a total of 190 respondents-47 doctors and 143 nurses. The response rate was 79.7% for doctors and 75.3% for nurses. Ninety-seven point eight percent of the doctors and 83.7% of the nurses chose the accepted definition of anaphylaxis. High proportions of doctors (89-94%) and nurses (65-72%) diagnose anaphylaxis in the three scenarios demonstrating anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. Forty-two point six percent of the doctors and 76.9% of the nurses incorrectly diagnosed single organ involvement without hypotension as anaphylaxis. As for treatment, 89.4% of the doctors indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 85.1% chose intramuscular route for adrenaline administration. Among the nurses, 40.3% indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 47.4% chose the intramuscular route for adrenaline. CONCLUSION: High proportion of doctors and nurses are able to recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, although there is a trend towards over diagnosis. There is good knowledge on drug of choice and the accepted route of adrenaline among the doctors. However, knowledge of treatment of anaphylaxis among nurses was moderate and can be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4116037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41160372014-08-05 Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff Ibrahim, Irwani Chew, Bao Li Zaw, Wai Wai Van Bever, Hugo P Asia Pac Allergy Original Article BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is an emergency condition that requires immediate, accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. However, little is known about the level of knowledge of doctors and nurses treating these patients in the Emergency Department. OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge of doctors and nurses in the Emergency Department on the recent definition and treatment recommendations of anaphylaxis. METHODS: We surveyed doctors and nurses of all grades in a tertiary Hospital Emergency Department using a standardized anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: We had a total of 190 respondents-47 doctors and 143 nurses. The response rate was 79.7% for doctors and 75.3% for nurses. Ninety-seven point eight percent of the doctors and 83.7% of the nurses chose the accepted definition of anaphylaxis. High proportions of doctors (89-94%) and nurses (65-72%) diagnose anaphylaxis in the three scenarios demonstrating anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock. Forty-two point six percent of the doctors and 76.9% of the nurses incorrectly diagnosed single organ involvement without hypotension as anaphylaxis. As for treatment, 89.4% of the doctors indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 85.1% chose intramuscular route for adrenaline administration. Among the nurses, 40.3% indicated adrenaline as the drug of choice and 47.4% chose the intramuscular route for adrenaline. CONCLUSION: High proportion of doctors and nurses are able to recognize the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis, although there is a trend towards over diagnosis. There is good knowledge on drug of choice and the accepted route of adrenaline among the doctors. However, knowledge of treatment of anaphylaxis among nurses was moderate and can be improved. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology 2014-07 2014-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4116037/ /pubmed/25097852 http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2014.4.3.164 Text en Copyright © 2014. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ibrahim, Irwani
Chew, Bao Li
Zaw, Wai Wai
Van Bever, Hugo P
Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title_full Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title_fullStr Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title_short Knowledge of anaphylaxis among Emergency Department staff
title_sort knowledge of anaphylaxis among emergency department staff
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25097852
http://dx.doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2014.4.3.164
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimirwani knowledgeofanaphylaxisamongemergencydepartmentstaff
AT chewbaoli knowledgeofanaphylaxisamongemergencydepartmentstaff
AT zawwaiwai knowledgeofanaphylaxisamongemergencydepartmentstaff
AT vanbeverhugop knowledgeofanaphylaxisamongemergencydepartmentstaff