Cargando…
The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25076044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131 |
_version_ | 1782328594467389440 |
---|---|
author | Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Bramhall, Michael Noyes, Harry Cruickshank, Sheena Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy |
author_facet | Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Bramhall, Michael Noyes, Harry Cruickshank, Sheena Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy |
author_sort | Flórez-Vargas, Oscar |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies. In this study, we evaluated in detail the methods reporting in a comprehensive set of trypanosomiasis experiments that should enable valid reproduction, integration and comparison of research findings. We evaluated a subset of other parasitic (Leishmania, Toxoplasma, Plasmodium, Trichuris and Schistosoma) and non-parasitic (Mycobacterium) experimental infections in order to compare the quality of method reporting more generally. A systematic review using PubMed (2000–2012) of all publications describing gene expression in cells and animals infected with Trypanosoma spp was undertaken based on PRISMA guidelines; 23 papers were identified and included. We defined a checklist of essential parameters that should be reported and have scored the number of those parameters that are reported for each publication. Bibliometric parameters (impact factor, citations and h-index) were used to look for association between Journal and Author status and the quality of method reporting. Trichuriasis experiments achieved the highest scores and included the only paper to score 100% in all criteria. The mean of scores achieved by Trypanosoma articles through the checklist was 65.5% (range 32–90%). Bibliometric parameters were not correlated with the quality of method reporting (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient <−0.5; p>0.05). Our results indicate that the quality of methods reporting in experimental parasitology is a cause for concern and it has not improved over time, despite there being evidence that most of the assessed parameters do influence the results. We propose that our set of parameters be used as guidelines to improve the quality of the reporting of experimental infection models as a pre-requisite for integrating and comparing sets of data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4116335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41163352014-08-04 The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Bramhall, Michael Noyes, Harry Cruickshank, Sheena Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy PLoS One Research Article There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies. In this study, we evaluated in detail the methods reporting in a comprehensive set of trypanosomiasis experiments that should enable valid reproduction, integration and comparison of research findings. We evaluated a subset of other parasitic (Leishmania, Toxoplasma, Plasmodium, Trichuris and Schistosoma) and non-parasitic (Mycobacterium) experimental infections in order to compare the quality of method reporting more generally. A systematic review using PubMed (2000–2012) of all publications describing gene expression in cells and animals infected with Trypanosoma spp was undertaken based on PRISMA guidelines; 23 papers were identified and included. We defined a checklist of essential parameters that should be reported and have scored the number of those parameters that are reported for each publication. Bibliometric parameters (impact factor, citations and h-index) were used to look for association between Journal and Author status and the quality of method reporting. Trichuriasis experiments achieved the highest scores and included the only paper to score 100% in all criteria. The mean of scores achieved by Trypanosoma articles through the checklist was 65.5% (range 32–90%). Bibliometric parameters were not correlated with the quality of method reporting (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient <−0.5; p>0.05). Our results indicate that the quality of methods reporting in experimental parasitology is a cause for concern and it has not improved over time, despite there being evidence that most of the assessed parameters do influence the results. We propose that our set of parameters be used as guidelines to improve the quality of the reporting of experimental infection models as a pre-requisite for integrating and comparing sets of data. Public Library of Science 2014-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4116335/ /pubmed/25076044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131 Text en © 2014 Flórez-Vargas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Bramhall, Michael Noyes, Harry Cruickshank, Sheena Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title | The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title_full | The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title_fullStr | The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title_short | The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments |
title_sort | quality of methods reporting in parasitology experiments |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25076044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT florezvargasoscar thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT bramhallmichael thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT noyesharry thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT cruickshanksheena thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT stevensrobert thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT brassandy thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT florezvargasoscar qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT bramhallmichael qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT noyesharry qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT cruickshanksheena qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT stevensrobert qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments AT brassandy qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments |