Cargando…

The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments

There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flórez-Vargas, Oscar, Bramhall, Michael, Noyes, Harry, Cruickshank, Sheena, Stevens, Robert, Brass, Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25076044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131
_version_ 1782328594467389440
author Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Bramhall, Michael
Noyes, Harry
Cruickshank, Sheena
Stevens, Robert
Brass, Andy
author_facet Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Bramhall, Michael
Noyes, Harry
Cruickshank, Sheena
Stevens, Robert
Brass, Andy
author_sort Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
collection PubMed
description There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies. In this study, we evaluated in detail the methods reporting in a comprehensive set of trypanosomiasis experiments that should enable valid reproduction, integration and comparison of research findings. We evaluated a subset of other parasitic (Leishmania, Toxoplasma, Plasmodium, Trichuris and Schistosoma) and non-parasitic (Mycobacterium) experimental infections in order to compare the quality of method reporting more generally. A systematic review using PubMed (2000–2012) of all publications describing gene expression in cells and animals infected with Trypanosoma spp was undertaken based on PRISMA guidelines; 23 papers were identified and included. We defined a checklist of essential parameters that should be reported and have scored the number of those parameters that are reported for each publication. Bibliometric parameters (impact factor, citations and h-index) were used to look for association between Journal and Author status and the quality of method reporting. Trichuriasis experiments achieved the highest scores and included the only paper to score 100% in all criteria. The mean of scores achieved by Trypanosoma articles through the checklist was 65.5% (range 32–90%). Bibliometric parameters were not correlated with the quality of method reporting (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient <−0.5; p>0.05). Our results indicate that the quality of methods reporting in experimental parasitology is a cause for concern and it has not improved over time, despite there being evidence that most of the assessed parameters do influence the results. We propose that our set of parameters be used as guidelines to improve the quality of the reporting of experimental infection models as a pre-requisite for integrating and comparing sets of data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4116335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41163352014-08-04 The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments Flórez-Vargas, Oscar Bramhall, Michael Noyes, Harry Cruickshank, Sheena Stevens, Robert Brass, Andy PLoS One Research Article There is a growing concern both inside and outside the scientific community over the lack of reproducibility of experiments. The depth and detail of reported methods are critical to the reproducibility of findings, but also for making it possible to compare and integrate data from different studies. In this study, we evaluated in detail the methods reporting in a comprehensive set of trypanosomiasis experiments that should enable valid reproduction, integration and comparison of research findings. We evaluated a subset of other parasitic (Leishmania, Toxoplasma, Plasmodium, Trichuris and Schistosoma) and non-parasitic (Mycobacterium) experimental infections in order to compare the quality of method reporting more generally. A systematic review using PubMed (2000–2012) of all publications describing gene expression in cells and animals infected with Trypanosoma spp was undertaken based on PRISMA guidelines; 23 papers were identified and included. We defined a checklist of essential parameters that should be reported and have scored the number of those parameters that are reported for each publication. Bibliometric parameters (impact factor, citations and h-index) were used to look for association between Journal and Author status and the quality of method reporting. Trichuriasis experiments achieved the highest scores and included the only paper to score 100% in all criteria. The mean of scores achieved by Trypanosoma articles through the checklist was 65.5% (range 32–90%). Bibliometric parameters were not correlated with the quality of method reporting (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient <−0.5; p>0.05). Our results indicate that the quality of methods reporting in experimental parasitology is a cause for concern and it has not improved over time, despite there being evidence that most of the assessed parameters do influence the results. We propose that our set of parameters be used as guidelines to improve the quality of the reporting of experimental infection models as a pre-requisite for integrating and comparing sets of data. Public Library of Science 2014-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4116335/ /pubmed/25076044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131 Text en © 2014 Flórez-Vargas et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flórez-Vargas, Oscar
Bramhall, Michael
Noyes, Harry
Cruickshank, Sheena
Stevens, Robert
Brass, Andy
The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title_full The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title_fullStr The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title_full_unstemmed The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title_short The Quality of Methods Reporting in Parasitology Experiments
title_sort quality of methods reporting in parasitology experiments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25076044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101131
work_keys_str_mv AT florezvargasoscar thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT bramhallmichael thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT noyesharry thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT cruickshanksheena thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT stevensrobert thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT brassandy thequalityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT florezvargasoscar qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT bramhallmichael qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT noyesharry qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT cruickshanksheena qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT stevensrobert qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments
AT brassandy qualityofmethodsreportinginparasitologyexperiments