Cargando…
Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051 |
_version_ | 1782328779128963072 |
---|---|
author | Jolley, Suzanne Thompson, Claire Hurley, James Medin, Evelina Butler, Lucy Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Freeman, Daniel Fowler, David Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa |
author_facet | Jolley, Suzanne Thompson, Claire Hurley, James Medin, Evelina Butler, Lucy Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Freeman, Daniel Fowler, David Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa |
author_sort | Jolley, Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other processes. In this study, we investigated the correlates of reasoning errors under differing task conditions in 204 participants with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis who completed three probabilistic reasoning tasks. Psychotic symptoms, affect, and IQ were also evaluated. We found that hasty decision makers were more likely to draw false conclusions, but only 37% of their reasoning errors were consistent with the limited data they had gathered. The remainder directly contradicted all the presented evidence. Reasoning errors showed task-dependent associations with IQ, affect, and psychotic symptoms. We conclude that limited data-gathering contributes to false conclusions but is not the only mechanism involved. Delusions may also be maintained by a tendency to disregard evidence. Low IQ and emotional biases may contribute to reasoning errors in more complex situations. Cognitive strategies to reduce reasoning errors should therefore extend beyond encouragement to gather more data, and incorporate interventions focused directly on these difficulties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41180182014-10-30 Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions Jolley, Suzanne Thompson, Claire Hurley, James Medin, Evelina Butler, Lucy Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Freeman, Daniel Fowler, David Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa Psychiatry Res Article Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other processes. In this study, we investigated the correlates of reasoning errors under differing task conditions in 204 participants with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis who completed three probabilistic reasoning tasks. Psychotic symptoms, affect, and IQ were also evaluated. We found that hasty decision makers were more likely to draw false conclusions, but only 37% of their reasoning errors were consistent with the limited data they had gathered. The remainder directly contradicted all the presented evidence. Reasoning errors showed task-dependent associations with IQ, affect, and psychotic symptoms. We conclude that limited data-gathering contributes to false conclusions but is not the only mechanism involved. Delusions may also be maintained by a tendency to disregard evidence. Low IQ and emotional biases may contribute to reasoning errors in more complex situations. Cognitive strategies to reduce reasoning errors should therefore extend beyond encouragement to gather more data, and incorporate interventions focused directly on these difficulties. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4118018/ /pubmed/24958065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jolley, Suzanne Thompson, Claire Hurley, James Medin, Evelina Butler, Lucy Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Freeman, Daniel Fowler, David Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title | Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title_full | Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title_fullStr | Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title_full_unstemmed | Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title_short | Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
title_sort | jumping to the wrong conclusions? an investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jolleysuzanne jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT thompsonclaire jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT hurleyjames jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT medinevelina jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT butlerlucy jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT bebbingtonpaul jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT dunngraham jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT freemandaniel jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT fowlerdavid jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT kuiperselizabeth jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions AT garetyphilippa jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions |