Cargando…

Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions

Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jolley, Suzanne, Thompson, Claire, Hurley, James, Medin, Evelina, Butler, Lucy, Bebbington, Paul, Dunn, Graham, Freeman, Daniel, Fowler, David, Kuipers, Elizabeth, Garety, Philippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051
_version_ 1782328779128963072
author Jolley, Suzanne
Thompson, Claire
Hurley, James
Medin, Evelina
Butler, Lucy
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Freeman, Daniel
Fowler, David
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
author_facet Jolley, Suzanne
Thompson, Claire
Hurley, James
Medin, Evelina
Butler, Lucy
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Freeman, Daniel
Fowler, David
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
author_sort Jolley, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other processes. In this study, we investigated the correlates of reasoning errors under differing task conditions in 204 participants with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis who completed three probabilistic reasoning tasks. Psychotic symptoms, affect, and IQ were also evaluated. We found that hasty decision makers were more likely to draw false conclusions, but only 37% of their reasoning errors were consistent with the limited data they had gathered. The remainder directly contradicted all the presented evidence. Reasoning errors showed task-dependent associations with IQ, affect, and psychotic symptoms. We conclude that limited data-gathering contributes to false conclusions but is not the only mechanism involved. Delusions may also be maintained by a tendency to disregard evidence. Low IQ and emotional biases may contribute to reasoning errors in more complex situations. Cognitive strategies to reduce reasoning errors should therefore extend beyond encouragement to gather more data, and incorporate interventions focused directly on these difficulties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4118018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41180182014-10-30 Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions Jolley, Suzanne Thompson, Claire Hurley, James Medin, Evelina Butler, Lucy Bebbington, Paul Dunn, Graham Freeman, Daniel Fowler, David Kuipers, Elizabeth Garety, Philippa Psychiatry Res Article Understanding how people with delusions arrive at false conclusions is central to the refinement of cognitive behavioural interventions. Making hasty decisions based on limited data (‘jumping to conclusions’, JTC) is one potential causal mechanism, but reasoning errors may also result from other processes. In this study, we investigated the correlates of reasoning errors under differing task conditions in 204 participants with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis who completed three probabilistic reasoning tasks. Psychotic symptoms, affect, and IQ were also evaluated. We found that hasty decision makers were more likely to draw false conclusions, but only 37% of their reasoning errors were consistent with the limited data they had gathered. The remainder directly contradicted all the presented evidence. Reasoning errors showed task-dependent associations with IQ, affect, and psychotic symptoms. We conclude that limited data-gathering contributes to false conclusions but is not the only mechanism involved. Delusions may also be maintained by a tendency to disregard evidence. Low IQ and emotional biases may contribute to reasoning errors in more complex situations. Cognitive strategies to reduce reasoning errors should therefore extend beyond encouragement to gather more data, and incorporate interventions focused directly on these difficulties. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4118018/ /pubmed/24958065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jolley, Suzanne
Thompson, Claire
Hurley, James
Medin, Evelina
Butler, Lucy
Bebbington, Paul
Dunn, Graham
Freeman, Daniel
Fowler, David
Kuipers, Elizabeth
Garety, Philippa
Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title_full Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title_fullStr Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title_full_unstemmed Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title_short Jumping to the wrong conclusions? An investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
title_sort jumping to the wrong conclusions? an investigation of the mechanisms of reasoning errors in delusions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24958065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.051
work_keys_str_mv AT jolleysuzanne jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT thompsonclaire jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT hurleyjames jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT medinevelina jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT butlerlucy jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT bebbingtonpaul jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT dunngraham jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT freemandaniel jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT fowlerdavid jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT kuiperselizabeth jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions
AT garetyphilippa jumpingtothewrongconclusionsaninvestigationofthemechanismsofreasoningerrorsindelusions