Cargando…
Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review
BACKGROUND: Ototoxicity is a known side effect of combined radiation therapy and cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of medulloblastoma. The delivery of an involved field boost by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce the dose to the inner ear when compared with conventional r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25041714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-158 |
_version_ | 1782328794951974912 |
---|---|
author | Vieira, Wilson Albieri Weltman, Eduardo Chen, Michael Jenwei da Silva, Nasjla Saba Cappellano, Andrea Maria Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo Gonçalves, Maria Ines Rabelo Ferrigno, Robson Hanriot, Rodrigo Morais Nadalin, Wladimir Odone Filho, Vicente Petrilli, Antonio Sergio |
author_facet | Vieira, Wilson Albieri Weltman, Eduardo Chen, Michael Jenwei da Silva, Nasjla Saba Cappellano, Andrea Maria Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo Gonçalves, Maria Ines Rabelo Ferrigno, Robson Hanriot, Rodrigo Morais Nadalin, Wladimir Odone Filho, Vicente Petrilli, Antonio Sergio |
author_sort | Vieira, Wilson Albieri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ototoxicity is a known side effect of combined radiation therapy and cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of medulloblastoma. The delivery of an involved field boost by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce the dose to the inner ear when compared with conventional radiotherapy. The dose of cisplatin may also affect the risk of ototoxicity. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the impact of involved field boost using IMRT and cisplatin dose on the rate of ototoxicity. METHODS: Data from 41 medulloblastoma patients treated with IMRT were collected. Overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method Hearing function was graded according to toxicity criteria of Pediatric Oncology Group (POG). Doses to inner ear and total cisplatin dose were correlated with hearing function by univariate and multivariate data analysis. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 44 months (range: 14 to 72 months), 37 patients remained alive, with two recurrences, both in spine with CSF involvement, resulting in a disease free-survival and overall survival of 85.2% and 90.2%, respectively. Seven patients (17%) experienced POG Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Cisplatin dose was a significant factor for hearing loss in univariate analysis (p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, median dose to inner ear was significantly associated with hearing loss (p < 0.01). POG grade 3 and 4 toxicity were uncommon with median doses to the inner ear bellow 42 Gy (p < 0.05) and total cisplatin dose of less than 375 mg/m(2) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT leads to a low rate of severe ototoxicity. Median radiation dose to auditory apparatus should be kept below 42 Gy. Cisplatin doses should not exceed 375 mg/m(2). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118158 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41181582014-08-02 Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review Vieira, Wilson Albieri Weltman, Eduardo Chen, Michael Jenwei da Silva, Nasjla Saba Cappellano, Andrea Maria Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo Gonçalves, Maria Ines Rabelo Ferrigno, Robson Hanriot, Rodrigo Morais Nadalin, Wladimir Odone Filho, Vicente Petrilli, Antonio Sergio Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Ototoxicity is a known side effect of combined radiation therapy and cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of medulloblastoma. The delivery of an involved field boost by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may reduce the dose to the inner ear when compared with conventional radiotherapy. The dose of cisplatin may also affect the risk of ototoxicity. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the impact of involved field boost using IMRT and cisplatin dose on the rate of ototoxicity. METHODS: Data from 41 medulloblastoma patients treated with IMRT were collected. Overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method Hearing function was graded according to toxicity criteria of Pediatric Oncology Group (POG). Doses to inner ear and total cisplatin dose were correlated with hearing function by univariate and multivariate data analysis. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 44 months (range: 14 to 72 months), 37 patients remained alive, with two recurrences, both in spine with CSF involvement, resulting in a disease free-survival and overall survival of 85.2% and 90.2%, respectively. Seven patients (17%) experienced POG Grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Cisplatin dose was a significant factor for hearing loss in univariate analysis (p < 0.03). In multivariate analysis, median dose to inner ear was significantly associated with hearing loss (p < 0.01). POG grade 3 and 4 toxicity were uncommon with median doses to the inner ear bellow 42 Gy (p < 0.05) and total cisplatin dose of less than 375 mg/m(2) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT leads to a low rate of severe ototoxicity. Median radiation dose to auditory apparatus should be kept below 42 Gy. Cisplatin doses should not exceed 375 mg/m(2). BioMed Central 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4118158/ /pubmed/25041714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-158 Text en Copyright © 2014 Vieira et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Vieira, Wilson Albieri Weltman, Eduardo Chen, Michael Jenwei da Silva, Nasjla Saba Cappellano, Andrea Maria Pereira, Liliane Desgualdo Gonçalves, Maria Ines Rabelo Ferrigno, Robson Hanriot, Rodrigo Morais Nadalin, Wladimir Odone Filho, Vicente Petrilli, Antonio Sergio Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title | Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title_full | Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title_fullStr | Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title_short | Ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a retrospective review |
title_sort | ototoxicity evaluation in medulloblastoma patients treated with involved field boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (imrt): a retrospective review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118158/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25041714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieirawilsonalbieri ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT weltmaneduardo ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT chenmichaeljenwei ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT dasilvanasjlasaba ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT cappellanoandreamaria ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT pereiralilianedesgualdo ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT goncalvesmariainesrabelo ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT ferrignorobson ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT hanriotrodrigomorais ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT nadalinwladimir ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT odonefilhovicente ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview AT petrilliantoniosergio ototoxicityevaluationinmedulloblastomapatientstreatedwithinvolvedfieldboostusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyimrtaretrospectivereview |