Cargando…
Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example
BACKGROUND: Insight into local health service provision in rural communities is limited in the literature. The dominant workforce focus in the rural health literature, while revealing issues of shortage of maldistribution, does not describe service provision in rural towns. Similarly aggregation of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-94 |
_version_ | 1782328806338461696 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Robyn Jones, Anne Lefmann, Sophie Sheppard, Lorraine |
author_facet | Adams, Robyn Jones, Anne Lefmann, Sophie Sheppard, Lorraine |
author_sort | Adams, Robyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Insight into local health service provision in rural communities is limited in the literature. The dominant workforce focus in the rural health literature, while revealing issues of shortage of maldistribution, does not describe service provision in rural towns. Similarly aggregation of data tends to render local health service provision virtually invisible. This paper describes a methodology to explore specific aspects of rural health service provision with an initial focus on understanding rurality as it pertains to rural physiotherapy service provision. METHOD: A system theory-case study heuristic combined with a sequential mixed methods approach to provide a framework for both quantitative and qualitative exploration across sites. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through surveys and in depth interviews. The investigation site was a large area of one Australian state with a mix of rural, regional and remote communities. RESULTS: 39 surveys were received from 11 locations within the investigation site and 19 in depth interviews were conducted. Stakeholder perspectives of rurality and workforce numbers informed the development of six case types relevant to the exploration of rural physiotherapy service provision. Participant perspective of rurality often differed with the geographical classification of their location. The numbers of onsite colleagues and local access to health services contributed to participant perceptions of rurality. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of understanding the concept of rurality was revealed by interview participants when providing their perspectives about rural physiotherapy service provision. Dual measures, such as rurality and workforce numbers, provide more relevant differentiation of sites to explore specific services, such rural physiotherapy service provision, than single measure of rurality as defined by geographic classification. The system theory-case study heuristic supports both qualitative and quantitative exploration in rural health services research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41182072014-08-02 Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example Adams, Robyn Jones, Anne Lefmann, Sophie Sheppard, Lorraine BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Insight into local health service provision in rural communities is limited in the literature. The dominant workforce focus in the rural health literature, while revealing issues of shortage of maldistribution, does not describe service provision in rural towns. Similarly aggregation of data tends to render local health service provision virtually invisible. This paper describes a methodology to explore specific aspects of rural health service provision with an initial focus on understanding rurality as it pertains to rural physiotherapy service provision. METHOD: A system theory-case study heuristic combined with a sequential mixed methods approach to provide a framework for both quantitative and qualitative exploration across sites. Stakeholder perspectives were obtained through surveys and in depth interviews. The investigation site was a large area of one Australian state with a mix of rural, regional and remote communities. RESULTS: 39 surveys were received from 11 locations within the investigation site and 19 in depth interviews were conducted. Stakeholder perspectives of rurality and workforce numbers informed the development of six case types relevant to the exploration of rural physiotherapy service provision. Participant perspective of rurality often differed with the geographical classification of their location. The numbers of onsite colleagues and local access to health services contributed to participant perceptions of rurality. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of understanding the concept of rurality was revealed by interview participants when providing their perspectives about rural physiotherapy service provision. Dual measures, such as rurality and workforce numbers, provide more relevant differentiation of sites to explore specific services, such rural physiotherapy service provision, than single measure of rurality as defined by geographic classification. The system theory-case study heuristic supports both qualitative and quantitative exploration in rural health services research. BioMed Central 2014-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4118207/ /pubmed/25066241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-94 Text en Copyright © 2014 Adams et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adams, Robyn Jones, Anne Lefmann, Sophie Sheppard, Lorraine Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title | Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title_full | Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title_fullStr | Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title_short | Utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
title_sort | utilising a collective case study system theory mixed methods approach: a rural health example |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25066241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsrobyn utilisingacollectivecasestudysystemtheorymixedmethodsapproacharuralhealthexample AT jonesanne utilisingacollectivecasestudysystemtheorymixedmethodsapproacharuralhealthexample AT lefmannsophie utilisingacollectivecasestudysystemtheorymixedmethodsapproacharuralhealthexample AT sheppardlorraine utilisingacollectivecasestudysystemtheorymixedmethodsapproacharuralhealthexample |