Cargando…

The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study

BACKGROUND: Musculus gastrocnemius tightness (MGT) can be diagnosed by comparing ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) with the knee extended and flexed. Although various measurement techniques exist, the degree of knee flexion needed to eliminate the effect of the gastrocnemius on ADF is still unknown. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumbach, Sebastian F, Brumann, Mareen, Binder, Jakob, Mutschler, Wolf, Regauer, Markus, Polzer, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25053374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-246
_version_ 1782328807477215232
author Baumbach, Sebastian F
Brumann, Mareen
Binder, Jakob
Mutschler, Wolf
Regauer, Markus
Polzer, Hans
author_facet Baumbach, Sebastian F
Brumann, Mareen
Binder, Jakob
Mutschler, Wolf
Regauer, Markus
Polzer, Hans
author_sort Baumbach, Sebastian F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Musculus gastrocnemius tightness (MGT) can be diagnosed by comparing ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) with the knee extended and flexed. Although various measurement techniques exist, the degree of knee flexion needed to eliminate the effect of the gastrocnemius on ADF is still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the minimal degree of knee flexion required to eliminate the restricting effect of the musculus gastrocnemius on ADF. METHODS: Bilateral ADF of 20 asymptomatic volunteers aged 18-40 years (50% female) was assessed prospectively at six different degrees of knee flexion (0°, 20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, Lunge). Tests were performed following a standardized protocol, non weightbearing and weightbearing, by two observers. Statistics comprised of descriptive statistics, t-tests, repeated measurement ANOVA and ICC. RESULTS: 20 individuals with a mean age of 27 ± 4 years were tested. No significant side to side differences were observed. The average ADF [95% confidence interval] for non weightbearing was 4° [1°-8°] with the knee extended and 20° [16°-24°] for the knee 75° flexed. Mean weightbearing ADF was 25° [22°-28°] for the knee extended and 39° [36°-42°] for the knee 75° flexed. The mean differences between 20° knee flexion and full extension were 15° [12°-18°] non weightbearing and 13° [11°-16°] weightbearing. Significant differences of ADF were only found between full extension and 20° of knee flexion. Further knee flexion did not increase ADF. CONCLUSION: Knee flexion of 20° fully eliminates the ADF restraining effect of the gastrocnemius. This knowledge is essential to design a standardized clinical examination assessing MGT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4118219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41182192014-08-02 The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study Baumbach, Sebastian F Brumann, Mareen Binder, Jakob Mutschler, Wolf Regauer, Markus Polzer, Hans BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Musculus gastrocnemius tightness (MGT) can be diagnosed by comparing ankle dorsiflexion (ADF) with the knee extended and flexed. Although various measurement techniques exist, the degree of knee flexion needed to eliminate the effect of the gastrocnemius on ADF is still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the minimal degree of knee flexion required to eliminate the restricting effect of the musculus gastrocnemius on ADF. METHODS: Bilateral ADF of 20 asymptomatic volunteers aged 18-40 years (50% female) was assessed prospectively at six different degrees of knee flexion (0°, 20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, Lunge). Tests were performed following a standardized protocol, non weightbearing and weightbearing, by two observers. Statistics comprised of descriptive statistics, t-tests, repeated measurement ANOVA and ICC. RESULTS: 20 individuals with a mean age of 27 ± 4 years were tested. No significant side to side differences were observed. The average ADF [95% confidence interval] for non weightbearing was 4° [1°-8°] with the knee extended and 20° [16°-24°] for the knee 75° flexed. Mean weightbearing ADF was 25° [22°-28°] for the knee extended and 39° [36°-42°] for the knee 75° flexed. The mean differences between 20° knee flexion and full extension were 15° [12°-18°] non weightbearing and 13° [11°-16°] weightbearing. Significant differences of ADF were only found between full extension and 20° of knee flexion. Further knee flexion did not increase ADF. CONCLUSION: Knee flexion of 20° fully eliminates the ADF restraining effect of the gastrocnemius. This knowledge is essential to design a standardized clinical examination assessing MGT. BioMed Central 2014-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4118219/ /pubmed/25053374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-246 Text en Copyright © 2014 Baumbach et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baumbach, Sebastian F
Brumann, Mareen
Binder, Jakob
Mutschler, Wolf
Regauer, Markus
Polzer, Hans
The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title_full The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title_fullStr The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title_full_unstemmed The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title_short The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
title_sort influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25053374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-246
work_keys_str_mv AT baumbachsebastianf theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT brumannmareen theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT binderjakob theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT mutschlerwolf theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT regauermarkus theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT polzerhans theinfluenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT baumbachsebastianf influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT brumannmareen influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT binderjakob influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT mutschlerwolf influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT regauermarkus influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy
AT polzerhans influenceofkneepositiononankledorsiflexionabiometricstudy