Cargando…
Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries
Active optical sensing (LIDAR and light curtain transmission) devices mounted on a mobile platform can correctly detect, localize, and classify trees. To conduct an evaluation and comparison of the different sensors, an optical encoder wheel was used for vehicle odometry and provided a measurement o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610783 |
_version_ | 1782328824354045952 |
---|---|
author | Garrido, Miguel Perez-Ruiz, Manuel Valero, Constantino Gliever, Chris J. Hanson, Bradley D. Slaughter, David C. |
author_facet | Garrido, Miguel Perez-Ruiz, Manuel Valero, Constantino Gliever, Chris J. Hanson, Bradley D. Slaughter, David C. |
author_sort | Garrido, Miguel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Active optical sensing (LIDAR and light curtain transmission) devices mounted on a mobile platform can correctly detect, localize, and classify trees. To conduct an evaluation and comparison of the different sensors, an optical encoder wheel was used for vehicle odometry and provided a measurement of the linear displacement of the prototype vehicle along a row of tree seedlings as a reference for each recorded sensor measurement. The field trials were conducted in a juvenile tree nursery with one-year-old grafted almond trees at Sierra Gold Nurseries, Yuba City, CA, United States. Through these tests and subsequent data processing, each sensor was individually evaluated to characterize their reliability, as well as their advantages and disadvantages for the proposed task. Test results indicated that 95.7% and 99.48% of the trees were successfully detected with the LIDAR and light curtain sensors, respectively. LIDAR correctly classified, between alive or dead tree states at a 93.75% success rate compared to 94.16% for the light curtain sensor. These results can help system designers select the most reliable sensor for the accurate detection and localization of each tree in a nursery, which might allow labor-intensive tasks, such as weeding, to be automated without damaging crops. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4118325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41183252014-08-01 Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries Garrido, Miguel Perez-Ruiz, Manuel Valero, Constantino Gliever, Chris J. Hanson, Bradley D. Slaughter, David C. Sensors (Basel) Article Active optical sensing (LIDAR and light curtain transmission) devices mounted on a mobile platform can correctly detect, localize, and classify trees. To conduct an evaluation and comparison of the different sensors, an optical encoder wheel was used for vehicle odometry and provided a measurement of the linear displacement of the prototype vehicle along a row of tree seedlings as a reference for each recorded sensor measurement. The field trials were conducted in a juvenile tree nursery with one-year-old grafted almond trees at Sierra Gold Nurseries, Yuba City, CA, United States. Through these tests and subsequent data processing, each sensor was individually evaluated to characterize their reliability, as well as their advantages and disadvantages for the proposed task. Test results indicated that 95.7% and 99.48% of the trees were successfully detected with the LIDAR and light curtain sensors, respectively. LIDAR correctly classified, between alive or dead tree states at a 93.75% success rate compared to 94.16% for the light curtain sensor. These results can help system designers select the most reliable sensor for the accurate detection and localization of each tree in a nursery, which might allow labor-intensive tasks, such as weeding, to be automated without damaging crops. MDPI 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4118325/ /pubmed/24949638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610783 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Garrido, Miguel Perez-Ruiz, Manuel Valero, Constantino Gliever, Chris J. Hanson, Bradley D. Slaughter, David C. Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title | Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title_full | Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title_fullStr | Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title_full_unstemmed | Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title_short | Active Optical Sensors for Tree Stem Detection and Classification in Nurseries |
title_sort | active optical sensors for tree stem detection and classification in nurseries |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24949638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garridomiguel activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries AT perezruizmanuel activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries AT valeroconstantino activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries AT glieverchrisj activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries AT hansonbradleyd activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries AT slaughterdavidc activeopticalsensorsfortreestemdetectionandclassificationinnurseries |