Cargando…

Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition

For physical activity recognition, smartphone sensors, such as an accelerometer and a gyroscope, are being utilized in many research studies. So far, particularly, the accelerometer has been extensively studied. In a few recent studies, a combination of a gyroscope, a magnetometer (in a supporting r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoaib, Muhammad, Bosch, Stephan, Incel, Ozlem Durmaz, Scholten, Hans, Havinga, Paul J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610146
_version_ 1782328830389649408
author Shoaib, Muhammad
Bosch, Stephan
Incel, Ozlem Durmaz
Scholten, Hans
Havinga, Paul J. M.
author_facet Shoaib, Muhammad
Bosch, Stephan
Incel, Ozlem Durmaz
Scholten, Hans
Havinga, Paul J. M.
author_sort Shoaib, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description For physical activity recognition, smartphone sensors, such as an accelerometer and a gyroscope, are being utilized in many research studies. So far, particularly, the accelerometer has been extensively studied. In a few recent studies, a combination of a gyroscope, a magnetometer (in a supporting role) and an accelerometer (in a lead role) has been used with the aim to improve the recognition performance. How and when are various motion sensors, which are available on a smartphone, best used for better recognition performance, either individually or in combination? This is yet to be explored. In order to investigate this question, in this paper, we explore how these various motion sensors behave in different situations in the activity recognition process. For this purpose, we designed a data collection experiment where ten participants performed seven different activities carrying smart phones at different positions. Based on the analysis of this data set, we show that these sensors, except the magnetometer, are each capable of taking the lead roles individually, depending on the type of activity being recognized, the body position, the used data features and the classification method employed (personalized or generalized). We also show that their combination only improves the overall recognition performance when their individual performances are not very high, so that there is room for performance improvement. We have made our data set and our data collection application publicly available, thereby making our experiments reproducible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4118351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41183512014-08-01 Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition Shoaib, Muhammad Bosch, Stephan Incel, Ozlem Durmaz Scholten, Hans Havinga, Paul J. M. Sensors (Basel) Article For physical activity recognition, smartphone sensors, such as an accelerometer and a gyroscope, are being utilized in many research studies. So far, particularly, the accelerometer has been extensively studied. In a few recent studies, a combination of a gyroscope, a magnetometer (in a supporting role) and an accelerometer (in a lead role) has been used with the aim to improve the recognition performance. How and when are various motion sensors, which are available on a smartphone, best used for better recognition performance, either individually or in combination? This is yet to be explored. In order to investigate this question, in this paper, we explore how these various motion sensors behave in different situations in the activity recognition process. For this purpose, we designed a data collection experiment where ten participants performed seven different activities carrying smart phones at different positions. Based on the analysis of this data set, we show that these sensors, except the magnetometer, are each capable of taking the lead roles individually, depending on the type of activity being recognized, the body position, the used data features and the classification method employed (personalized or generalized). We also show that their combination only improves the overall recognition performance when their individual performances are not very high, so that there is room for performance improvement. We have made our data set and our data collection application publicly available, thereby making our experiments reproducible. MDPI 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4118351/ /pubmed/24919015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610146 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shoaib, Muhammad
Bosch, Stephan
Incel, Ozlem Durmaz
Scholten, Hans
Havinga, Paul J. M.
Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title_full Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title_fullStr Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title_short Fusion of Smartphone Motion Sensors for Physical Activity Recognition
title_sort fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919015
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140610146
work_keys_str_mv AT shoaibmuhammad fusionofsmartphonemotionsensorsforphysicalactivityrecognition
AT boschstephan fusionofsmartphonemotionsensorsforphysicalactivityrecognition
AT incelozlemdurmaz fusionofsmartphonemotionsensorsforphysicalactivityrecognition
AT scholtenhans fusionofsmartphonemotionsensorsforphysicalactivityrecognition
AT havingapauljm fusionofsmartphonemotionsensorsforphysicalactivityrecognition